• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院医师在主治医生监督下进行单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的可行性与安全性

Feasibility and Safety of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy by a Surgical Resident under Supervision of a Staff Surgeon.

作者信息

Joo Jung Il, Park Jung Ho, Kim Dong Hyun, Lim Sang Woo

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019 Jun;22(2):55-60. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2019.22.2.55. Epub 2019 Jun 15.

DOI:10.7602/jmis.2019.22.2.55
PMID:35602765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8980146/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was aimed at reporting our experience with single-incision laparoscopic appendectomies (SILA) performed by a surgical resident, and to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the procedure, together with a comparison of the outcomes of the same procedure performed by a staff surgeon.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case series analysis of 60 consecutive patients who underwent SILA. Two surgeons, an attending staff surgeon and a second-year surgical resident, performed the SILA procedures. SILA procedures performed by the resident were intraoperatively guided and supervised by the staff surgeon.

RESULTS

A total of 60 case-matched patients with acute appendicitis underwent a SILA performed by either the resident or attending staff. There was no difference in patient demographics between the two groups of patients. The mean operation time was longer in the resident group than in the staff group (43.2±6.0 minutes vs. 32.9±10.5 minutes, <0.001). There was no significant difference in the operative data between the two groups. No conversion to an open procedure occurred in either group. Postoperative pain, time to onset of oral intake, and number of days of postoperative hospital stay were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

SILA procedures performed by a resident are safe and feasible despite longer operation times. Perioperative supervision and guidance by an attending staff surgeon may facilitate surgical outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在报告外科住院医师进行单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SILA)的经验,并评估该手术的安全性和可行性,同时比较由主治医师进行相同手术的结果。

方法

我们对连续60例行SILA的患者进行了回顾性病例系列分析。两名外科医生,一名主治医师和一名二年级外科住院医师,进行了SILA手术。住院医师进行的SILA手术在术中由主治医师指导和监督。

结果

共有60例急性阑尾炎患者进行了由住院医师或主治医师实施的SILA手术。两组患者的人口统计学特征无差异。住院医师组的平均手术时间比主治医师组长(43.2±6.0分钟对32.9±10.5分钟,<0.001)。两组之间的手术数据无显著差异。两组均未发生转为开放手术的情况。两组术后疼痛、开始经口进食时间和术后住院天数相似。

结论

住院医师进行的SILA手术尽管手术时间较长,但安全可行。主治医师在围手术期的监督和指导可能有助于手术结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a456/8980146/735b0e3c5672/jmis-22-2-055f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a456/8980146/735b0e3c5672/jmis-22-2-055f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a456/8980146/735b0e3c5672/jmis-22-2-055f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility and Safety of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy by a Surgical Resident under Supervision of a Staff Surgeon.住院医师在主治医生监督下进行单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的可行性与安全性
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019 Jun;22(2):55-60. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2019.22.2.55. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
2
Single-incision laparoscopically assisted appendectomy performed by residents is safe and feasible: A single institution, retrospective case series.住院医师实施的单孔腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术是安全可行的:一项单机构回顾性病例系列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Feb 10;15:43-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.02.002. eCollection 2017 Mar.
3
Single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic appendectomy: a case-matched comparative analysis.单孔与多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:病例匹配的对比分析
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1530-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3837-7. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
4
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy by Surgical Trainees.外科实习生的单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Dec;26(6):470-472. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000340.
5
Is single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy suitable for complicated appendicitis? A comparative analysis with standard multiport laparoscopic appendectomy.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术适用于复杂性阑尾炎吗?与标准多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的对比分析。
Asian J Surg. 2020 Jan;43(1):282-289. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 May 23.
6
Feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in a small hospital.小型医院单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的可行性
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Aug;91(2):74-9. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.91.2.74. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
7
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using the Surgical-Glove Port Through an Umbilical Incision: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.经脐部切口使用手术手套端口行腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项单中心回顾性研究
Cureus. 2022 Apr 26;14(4):e24512. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24512. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
A prospective randomized comparison of single-port laparoscopic procedure with open and standard 3-port laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of acute appendicitis.单孔腹腔镜手术与开放手术及标准三孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Feb;23(1):74-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182754543.
9
Impact of Resident-Performed Laparoscopic Appendectomy on Patient Outcomes and Safety.住院医师实施的腹腔镜阑尾切除术对患者预后和安全性的影响。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):41-46. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0357. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
10
Evaluating the Feasibility of Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by a Resident Based on Propensity Score Matching.基于倾向得分匹配评估住院医师实施单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的可行性。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Oct;27(10):1031-1037. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0016. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Resident-Performed Laparoscopic Appendectomy on Patient Outcomes and Safety.住院医师实施的腹腔镜阑尾切除术对患者预后和安全性的影响。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):41-46. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0357. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
2
Single-incision laparoscopically assisted appendectomy performed by residents is safe and feasible: A single institution, retrospective case series.住院医师实施的单孔腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术是安全可行的:一项单机构回顾性病例系列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Feb 10;15:43-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.02.002. eCollection 2017 Mar.
3
Can laparoscopic appendectomy be safely performed by surgical residents without prior experience of open appendectomy?
没有开腹阑尾切除术经验的外科住院医师是否可以安全地进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术?
Asian J Surg. 2018 May;41(3):270-273. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
4
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy by Surgical Trainees.外科实习生的单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Dec;26(6):470-472. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000340.
5
Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy with the help of a needle grasper: better cosmetic results and fewer trocars than conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.借助持针器的两孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术相比,美容效果更佳且穿刺孔更少。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2016;11(2):105-10. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2016.60504. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
6
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery as a teaching procedure: a single-center experience of more than 2100 procedures.单孔腹腔镜手术作为一种教学术式:单中心超2100例手术的经验
Surg Today. 2016 Nov;46(11):1318-24. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1315-7. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
7
Resident involvement in laparoscopic procedures does not worsen clinical outcomes but may increase operative times and length of hospital stay.住院医师参与腹腔镜手术不会使临床结果恶化,但可能会增加手术时间和住院时间。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3783-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4674-z. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
8
Acute appendicitis can be treated with single-incision laparoscopy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.急性阑尾炎可采用单孔腹腔镜手术治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Apr;17(4):281-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12839.
9
Single-incision versus three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单切口与三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):822-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3735-z. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing single incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.比较单切口与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2014 Aug;38(8):1937-46. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2535-x.