Suppr超能文献

应对预期和残疾在新的 ICD-11 慢性疼痛类别中:一项大规模登记研究。

Coping expectancies and disability across the new ICD-11 chronic pain categories: A large-scale registry study.

机构信息

The Mind-Body Lab, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2022 Aug;26(7):1510-1522. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1979. Epub 2022 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, a new classification system for chronic pain was included in the 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This study aims to investigate how expectancies of coping, that is pain catastrophizing and general self-efficacy, are associated with ICD-11 chronic pain categories in a large pain clinic population. Furthermore, we investigate how coping expectancies are associated with pain-related disability, cross-sectionally and longitudinally across the novel pain classifications.

METHODS

The sample was retrieved from the Oslo University Hospital Pain Registry and included baseline data from 2875 chronic pain patients and 12-month follow-up data for 920 patients. Demographic and clinical variables were compared across the ICD-11 chronic pain categories through ANOVA. Multiple regression models were carried out to investigate cross-sectional and longitudinal associations.

RESULTS

With the exception of age, our data showed no significant differences across the ICD-11 chronic pain categories. Coping expectancies were associated with disability at baseline. At 12-month follow-up, coping expectancies did not predict pain-related disability when controlling for baseline levels of disability, pain intensity and pain duration. Pain classification (primary vs secondary) did not contribute significantly to the models. Helplessness had the strongest simple relationship to disability, compared with global pain catastrophizing and its additional subscales, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally.

CONCLUSION

Coping expectancies, pain intensity and pain-related disability appear similar across the novel chronic pain classifications, indicating that all pain patients may benefit from targeting these variables. Consistent with recent developments in stress theory, helplessness and self-efficacy were cross-sectionally associated with negative pain outcomes.

SIGNIFICANCE

Levels of coping expectancies, demographic characteristics, pain-related disability and pain intensity are similar across all ICD-11 chronic pain diagnostic categories. Thus, chronic primary pain is not stronger associated with psychosocial factors such as catastrophizing and self-efficacy than chronic secondary pain. Therefore, chronic pain patients, independent of diagnosis, may benefit from the assessment of these psychosocial factors and targeted interventions such as CBT should be considered.

摘要

背景

最近,一种新的慢性疼痛分类系统被纳入了第 11 版《国际疾病分类》(ICD-11)。本研究旨在调查在一个大型疼痛诊所人群中,应对期望(即疼痛灾难化和一般自我效能感)与 ICD-11 慢性疼痛分类之间的关系。此外,我们还调查了应对期望与疼痛相关残疾的横断面和纵向关系,跨越新的疼痛分类。

方法

该样本取自奥斯陆大学医院疼痛登记处,包括 2875 名慢性疼痛患者的基线数据和 920 名患者的 12 个月随访数据。通过方差分析比较了 ICD-11 慢性疼痛分类中的人口统计学和临床变量。进行了多元回归模型,以调查横断面和纵向关联。

结果

除了年龄之外,我们的数据在 ICD-11 慢性疼痛分类中没有显示出显著差异。应对期望与基线时的残疾有关。在 12 个月的随访中,当控制基线残疾水平、疼痛强度和疼痛持续时间时,应对期望并不能预测与疼痛相关的残疾。疼痛分类(原发性与继发性)对模型没有显著贡献。无助感与残疾的关系最强,无论是在横断面还是纵向,都强于总体疼痛灾难化及其附加子量表。

结论

应对期望、疼痛强度和与疼痛相关的残疾在新的慢性疼痛分类中似乎相似,这表明所有疼痛患者都可能受益于针对这些变量的治疗。与应激理论的最新进展一致,无助感和自我效能感与负面的疼痛结果在横断面上相关。

意义

应对期望、人口统计学特征、与疼痛相关的残疾和疼痛强度在所有 ICD-11 慢性疼痛诊断类别中相似。因此,慢性原发性疼痛与灾难化和自我效能等心理社会因素的相关性并不比慢性继发性疼痛更强。因此,无论诊断如何,慢性疼痛患者都可能受益于这些心理社会因素的评估,并应考虑采用认知行为疗法等有针对性的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32f6/9543422/46faf5cfba73/EJP-26-1510-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验