Suppr超能文献

慢性下腰痛患者残疾的心理风险与保护因素——一项初级保健中的纵向分析

Psychological risk and protective factors for disability in chronic low back pain - a longitudinal analysis in primary care.

作者信息

Jegan Nikita Roman A, Brugger Markus, Viniol Annika, Strauch Konstantin, Barth Jürgen, Baum Erika, Leonhardt Corinna, Becker Annette

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Philipps-University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4, 35032, Marburg, Germany.

Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Chair of Genetic Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Mar 20;18(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1482-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Utilizing psychological resources when dealing with chronic low back pain might aid the prevention of disability. The observational study at hand examined the longitudinal impact of resilience and coping resources on disability in addition to established risk factors.

METHODS

Four hundred eighty four patients with chronic low back pain (>3 months) were recruited in primary care practices and followed up for one year. Resilience, coping, depression, somatization, pain and demographic variables were measured at baseline. At follow-up (participation rate 89%), data on disability was collected. We first calculated bivariate correlations of all the predictors with each other and with follow-up disability. We then used a multiple regression to evaluate the impact of all the predictors on disability together.

RESULTS

More than half of the followed up sample showed a high degree of disability at baseline (53.7%) and had suffered for more than 10 years from pain (50.4%). Besides gender all of the predictors were bivariately associated with follow-up disability. However in the main analysis (multiple regression), disability at follow up was only predicted by baseline disability, age and somatization. There was no relationship between resilience and disability, nor between coping resources and disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it is known that there are cross-sectional relationships between resilience/coping resources and disability we were not able to replicate it in the multiple regression. This can have several reasons: a) the majority of patients in our sample were much more disabled and suffered for a longer time than in other studies. Therefore our results might be limited to this specific population and resilience and coping resources might still have a protective influence in acute or subacute populations. b) We used a rather broad operationalization of resilience. There is emerging evidence that focusing on more concrete sub facets like (pain) self-efficacy and acceptance might be more beneficial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trial Register, DRKS00003123 (June 28th 2011).

摘要

背景

应对慢性下腰痛时利用心理资源可能有助于预防残疾。本观察性研究除了考察已确定的风险因素外,还研究了心理韧性和应对资源对残疾的纵向影响。

方法

在初级医疗保健机构招募了484例慢性下腰痛(>3个月)患者,并对其进行了为期一年的随访。在基线时测量心理韧性、应对方式、抑郁、躯体化、疼痛及人口统计学变量。在随访时(参与率89%),收集残疾数据。我们首先计算了所有预测因素之间以及它们与随访时残疾之间的双变量相关性。然后使用多元回归来评估所有预测因素对残疾的综合影响。

结果

超过一半的随访样本在基线时显示出高度残疾(53.7%),且疼痛持续时间超过10年(50.4%)。除性别外,所有预测因素与随访时的残疾均存在双变量关联。然而,在主要分析(多元回归)中,随访时的残疾仅由基线残疾、年龄和躯体化预测。心理韧性与残疾之间、应对资源与残疾之间均无关联。

结论

尽管已知心理韧性/应对资源与残疾之间存在横断面关系,但我们在多元回归中未能重现这一关系。这可能有几个原因:a)我们样本中的大多数患者比其他研究中的患者残疾程度更高、患病时间更长。因此,我们的结果可能仅限于这一特定人群,而心理韧性和应对资源在急性或亚急性人群中可能仍具有保护作用。b)我们对心理韧性的操作定义较为宽泛。越来越多的证据表明,关注更具体的子方面,如(疼痛)自我效能感和接纳,可能更有益。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册中心,DRKS00003123(2011年6月28日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58e0/5360090/e87aab938b32/12891_2017_1482_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验