Research, Australian Institute of Business Pty Ltd, Adelaide, Australia.
CHL, Centre for Health Leadership, Surry Hills, Australia.
J Health Organ Manag. 2022 May 24;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2021-0318.
The study aims to assess medical engagement levels at two teaching hospitals and a 500 bed private hospital in two states operated by the same health care provider and to describe individual and organisational factors that influence and change medical engagement.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A survey was emailed to all junior and senior medical staff, seeking responses to 30 pre-determined items. The survey used a valid and reliable instrument which provided an overall index of medical engagement. Qualitative data were also collected by including an open ended question.
Doctors ( = 810) working at all sites are in the top 20-40 percentile when compared to Australia and the United Kingdom. Two sites in one state were in the highest relative engagement band with the other being in the high relative range when compared to the (UK) and the medium relative band when compared to sites in Australia. Senior doctors working at all three were less engaged on feeling valued and empowered, when compared to having purpose and direction or working in a collaborative culture. This appears to be related to work satisfaction and whether they feel encouraged to develop their skills and progress their careers. Junior doctors at 1 site are much less engaged than colleagues working at another. Since their formal training pathways are identical the informal training experience appears to be an engagement factor.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Despite medical engagement being recognised as crucial, little is known about individual and organisational factors that support doctors to be engaged, particularly for juniors and in the private sector.
本研究旨在评估在由同一医疗服务提供者运营的两个州的两所教学医院和一家 500 张床位的私立医院的医疗参与度,并描述影响和改变医疗参与度的个人和组织因素。
设计/方法/方法:向所有初级和高级医务人员发送电子邮件调查,要求他们对 30 个预先确定的项目做出回应。该调查使用了一种有效且可靠的工具,提供了医疗参与度的总体指数。还通过包括一个开放式问题收集了定性数据。
与澳大利亚和英国相比,在所有地点工作的医生(=810 名)处于前 20-40%的百分位。一个州的两个地点处于最高相对参与带,另一个地点则处于与(英国)相比的高相对范围和与澳大利亚相比的中相对带。与拥有目标和方向或在协作文化中工作相比,在所有三个地点工作的高级医生在感到被重视和授权方面的参与度较低。这似乎与工作满意度以及他们是否感到受到鼓励发展自己的技能和推进自己的职业生涯有关。一个地点的初级医生的参与度远低于另一个地点的同事。由于他们的正式培训途径相同,非正式的培训经验似乎是一个参与因素。
原创性/价值:尽管医疗参与度被认为至关重要,但对于支持医生参与的个人和组织因素知之甚少,尤其是对于初级医生和私营部门。