• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在适应变化时,变革沟通和状态激励的重要性。

The importance of change communication and state motivation when adapting to changes.

作者信息

Stasielowicz Lukasz

机构信息

Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.

出版信息

Scand J Psychol. 2025 Feb;66(1):59-75. doi: 10.1111/sjop.13066. Epub 2024 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1111/sjop.13066
PMID:39161126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11735255/
Abstract

Employees often work in dynamic environments requiring adaptive performance (e.g., emergencies, clients from other cultures). To optimize change management, employee training, and personnel selection in organizations, researchers have focused on trait-like predictors of adaption to change, such as personality traits or cognitive ability. The study (N = 300) shifts the focus to more proximal performance predictors - change communication and task-related state motivation. Adaptive performance was modeled using latent growth models. Providing two change-related hints, one at the beginning of the task and another directly after the change, mitigated performance impairment observed directly after the change. Moreover, this advantage largely persisted throughout the later stages of the task. In contrast, a single hint at the beginning of the task did not substantially facilitate adaption. Finally, task-related state motivation was linked to better performance on the subsequent measurement occasion. Organizations might minimize change-induced losses by deploying adequate change communication and maintaining employee motivation.

摘要

员工经常在需要适应性绩效的动态环境中工作(例如,紧急情况、来自其他文化背景的客户)。为了优化组织中的变革管理、员工培训和人员选拔,研究人员将重点放在了适应变革的特质类预测指标上,如人格特质或认知能力。这项研究(N = 300)将重点转移到了更直接的绩效预测指标——变革沟通和与任务相关的状态动机上。使用潜在增长模型对适应性绩效进行建模。在任务开始时和变革之后直接提供两条与变革相关的提示,减轻了变革后立即观察到的绩效损害。此外,这一优势在任务的后期阶段基本持续存在。相比之下,在任务开始时提供一条提示并没有实质性地促进适应。最后,与任务相关的状态动机与后续测量时更好的绩效相关。组织可以通过进行充分的变革沟通和维持员工动机来尽量减少变革带来的损失。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/8bf6a68df7f3/SJOP-66-59-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/c5c951cf41ea/SJOP-66-59-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/1b31636784e2/SJOP-66-59-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/68d5262f1621/SJOP-66-59-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/6b98634473c3/SJOP-66-59-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/a5e226c3060f/SJOP-66-59-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/43d024fe458a/SJOP-66-59-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/8bf6a68df7f3/SJOP-66-59-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/c5c951cf41ea/SJOP-66-59-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/1b31636784e2/SJOP-66-59-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/68d5262f1621/SJOP-66-59-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/6b98634473c3/SJOP-66-59-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/a5e226c3060f/SJOP-66-59-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/43d024fe458a/SJOP-66-59-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fef/11735255/8bf6a68df7f3/SJOP-66-59-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The importance of change communication and state motivation when adapting to changes.在适应变化时,变革沟通和状态激励的重要性。
Scand J Psychol. 2025 Feb;66(1):59-75. doi: 10.1111/sjop.13066. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
How do Employees Adapt to Organizational Change? The Role of Meaning-making and Work Engagement.员工如何适应组织变革?意义建构和工作投入的作用。
Span J Psychol. 2020 Dec 21;23:e56. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2020.55.
3
Personality and adaptive performance at work: a meta-analytic investigation.人格与工作中的适应绩效:元分析研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Jan;99(1):162-79. doi: 10.1037/a0034285. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
4
Implicit motives, explicit traits, and task and contextual performance at work.内隐动机、外显特质与工作中的任务和情境绩效。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Nov;97(6):1201-17. doi: 10.1037/a0029556. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
5
Critical reflections on the currently leading definition of sustainable employability.对当前可持续就业能力主导定义的批判性反思。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 Jun 1;42(6):557-560. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3585. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
6
Perceived importance of employees' traits in the service industry.员工特质在服务业中的感知重要性。
Psychol Rep. 2009 Apr;104(2):567-78. doi: 10.2466/pr0.104.2.567-578.
7
Putting workers' safety front and center: Employee-organization exchange and employee safety performance.将员工安全置于首位:员工与组织的交换关系及员工安全绩效。
J Safety Res. 2024 Dec;91:85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.007. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
8
Describing motivation for health and treatment decisions and communication choices of calf-care workers on western United States dairies.描述美国西部奶牛场小牛护理人员的健康和治疗决策以及沟通选择的动机。
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Mar;104(3):3197-3209. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18669. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
9
Exploring performance predictors among employees in a pharmacist-led medication management center.探讨药剂师主导的药物管理中心员工的绩效预测因素。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Nov-Dec;60(6):809-817. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 May 7.
10
An exploratory study of gender and motivation to lead in millennials.千禧一代中性别与领导动机的探索性研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(2):138-152. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1570902.

本文引用的文献

1
Metacognition, public health compliance, and vaccination willingness.元认知、公共卫生合规性和疫苗接种意愿。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 24;120(43):e2105425120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105425120. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
2
Cross-level covariance approach to the disaggregation of between-person effect and within-person effect.用于分解个体间效应和个体内效应的跨层次协方差方法。
Psychol Methods. 2025 Apr;30(2):340-373. doi: 10.1037/met0000548. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
3
Developing adaptive performance: A conceptual model to guide simulation-based training design.
培养适应性绩效:一个指导基于模拟训练设计的概念模型。
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Jun 1;6(3):e10762. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10762. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Choice adaptation to changing environments: trends, feedback, and observability of change.选择适应不断变化的环境:变化的趋势、反馈和可观察性。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1486-1512. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01313-2. Epub 2022 May 23.
5
Patterns of choice adaptation in dynamic risky environments.动态风险环境中的选择适应模式。
Mem Cognit. 2022 May;50(4):864-881. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01244-4. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
6
A scoping review of adaptive expertise in education.教育领域中的适应专长的范围综述。
Med Teach. 2021 Mar;43(3):347-355. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1851020. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
7
Cognitive control strategies and adaptive performance in a complex work task.认知控制策略与复杂工作任务中的适应性能。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Oct;106(10):1586-1599. doi: 10.1037/apl0000830. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
8
Keeping Calm and Carrying On: Relating Affect Spin and Pulse to Complex Skill Acquisition and Adaptive Performance.保持冷静,继续前行:将情感波动和脉搏与复杂技能习得及适应性表现联系起来。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 10;11:377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00377. eCollection 2020.
9
General mental ability and goal type as antecedents of recurrent adaptive task performance.一般心理能力和目标类型对反复适应任务表现的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jun;104(6):796-813. doi: 10.1037/apl0000379. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
10
Individual Differences in Adaptability to Isolated, Confined, and Extreme Environments.个体对孤立、受限和极端环境的适应能力差异。
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018 Jun 1;89(6):536-546. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4951.2018.