• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Diabetes-Related Complications and Costs in Medicare Beneficiaries with Comorbid Rheumatoid Arthritis and Diabetes Treated with Abatacept Versus Other Targeted DMARDs.使用阿巴西普与其他靶向性改善病情抗风湿药治疗的合并类风湿性关节炎和糖尿病的医疗保险受益人的糖尿病相关并发症及费用
Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Aug;9(4):1091-1107. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00453-w. Epub 2022 May 23.
2
Risk and cost of infection-related hospitalizations in medicare beneficiaries with comorbid rheumatoid arthritis treated with abatacept versus other targeted disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.类风湿关节炎合并症患者接受阿巴西普与其他靶向疾病修正抗风湿药物治疗后的感染相关住院的风险和成本。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):299-307. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1881525.
3
The economic burden of switching targeted disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs among rheumatoid arthritis patients.类风湿关节炎患者更换靶向改善病情抗风湿药物的经济负担。
J Med Econ. 2019 Apr;22(4):350-358. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1571498. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
4
Comparison of infection-related hospitalization risk and costs in tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-experienced patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with abatacept or other targeted disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (tDMARDs).比较肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)经验患者接受阿巴西普或其他靶向治疗药物(tDMARDs)与感染相关的住院风险和费用。
J Med Econ. 2020 Sep;23(9):1025-1031. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1772271. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
5
Real-world evaluation of TNF-inhibitor utilization in rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎中肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂使用情况的真实世界评估
J Med Econ. 2016;19(2):91-102. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1099538. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
6
Treatment Persistence and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Changing Biologics in the USA.美国改变生物制剂治疗的类风湿关节炎患者的治疗持久性和医疗保健费用。
Adv Ther. 2017 Nov;34(11):2422-2435. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0617-5. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
7
Economic Burden of Switching to a Non-Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Versus a Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Biologic Therapy among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者从肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂转换为非肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂生物治疗的经济负担
Adv Ther. 2016 May;33(5):807-23. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0318-5. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
8
Risk of Hospitalized Infection and Initiation of Abatacept Versus Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.类风湿关节炎患者住院感染风险和阿巴西普与肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂起始治疗的比较:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Jan;72(1):9-17. doi: 10.1002/acr.23824. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
9
Comparative risk of osteoporotic fracture among patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving TNF inhibitors versus other biologics: a cohort study.类风湿关节炎患者接受 TNF 抑制剂与其他生物制剂治疗后的骨质疏松性骨折风险比较:一项队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Nov;31(11):2131-2139. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05488-9. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
10
Real-world Comparative Effectiveness of Methotrexate-based Combinations for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.基于甲氨蝶呤的联合疗法治疗类风湿关节炎的真实世界疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2023 Sep;45(9):e177-e186. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.024. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical costs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have comorbid diabetes mellitus.患有合并症糖尿病的类风湿性关节炎患者的医疗费用。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 1;20(8):e0328094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328094. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of Biologic Drugs on Comorbidity Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.生物制剂对类风湿关节炎合并症结局的影响:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 26;14(13):4547. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134547.
3
Insights and implications of sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis.骨质疏松症中性别二态性的见解与意义。
Bone Res. 2024 Feb 18;12(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00306-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Risk of Diabetes Mellitus in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic or Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Drugs: A Cohort Study.使用生物制剂或靶向合成改善病情药物治疗的类风湿关节炎患者患糖尿病的比较风险:一项队列研究
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 Apr;2(4):222-231. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11124. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
2
Risk of serious infections in tocilizumab versus other biologic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multidatabase cohort study.托珠单抗与其他生物制剂治疗类风湿关节炎患者的严重感染风险:多数据库队列研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Apr;78(4):456-464. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214367. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
3
Effects of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and tocilizumab on the glycosylated hemoglobin levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; an observational study.肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂和托珠单抗对类风湿关节炎患者糖化血红蛋白水平的影响:一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 25;13(4):e0196368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196368. eCollection 2018.
4
Comparative Cardiovascular Risk of Abatacept and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis With and Without Diabetes Mellitus: A Multidatabase Cohort Study.比较伴有和不伴有糖尿病的类风湿关节炎患者使用阿巴西普和肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂的心血管风险:一项多数据库队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jan 24;7(3):e007393. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007393.
5
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, tocilizumab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and after the failure of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs only: systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗、戈利木单抗、托珠单抗和阿巴西普用于治疗既往未使用改善病情抗风湿药物治疗且仅在传统改善病情抗风湿药物治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(35):1-610. doi: 10.3310/hta20350.
6
Comorbid conditions are associated with healthcare utilization, medical charges and mortality of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.合并症与类风湿关节炎患者的医疗服务利用、医疗费用及死亡率相关。
Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Jun;35(6):1483-92. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3277-y. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
7
2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.2015年美国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎治疗指南
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Jan;68(1):1-25. doi: 10.1002/acr.22783. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
8
Comparative Risk of Hospitalized Infection Associated With Biologic Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Enrolled in Medicare.医疗保险中类风湿关节炎患者使用生物制剂与住院感染相关的比较风险。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):56-66. doi: 10.1002/art.39399.
9
Abatacept improves whole-body insulin sensitivity in rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study.阿巴西普改善类风湿关节炎患者的全身胰岛素敏感性:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(21):e888. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000888.
10
Relationship of diabetes complications severity to healthcare utilization and costs among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.医疗保险优势受益人群中糖尿病并发症严重程度与医疗服务利用及费用的关系。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Jan 1;21(1):e62-70.

使用阿巴西普与其他靶向性改善病情抗风湿药治疗的合并类风湿性关节炎和糖尿病的医疗保险受益人的糖尿病相关并发症及费用

Diabetes-Related Complications and Costs in Medicare Beneficiaries with Comorbid Rheumatoid Arthritis and Diabetes Treated with Abatacept Versus Other Targeted DMARDs.

作者信息

Patel Vardhaman, Pulungan Zulkarnain, Shah Anne, Jones Barton, Petrilla Allison, Ferri Leticia, Han Xue, Michaud Kaleb

机构信息

Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrence Township, NJ, USA.

Avalere Health, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Aug;9(4):1091-1107. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00453-w. Epub 2022 May 23.

DOI:10.1007/s40744-022-00453-w
PMID:35604547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9314491/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Targeted DMARD (tDMARD) use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may increase whole-body insulin sensitivity. Evidence comparing the T2DM-related clinical and economic impact of abatacept versus other tDMARDs is limited. This study compared differences in T2DM-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with RA and T2DM.

METHODS

This retrospective study used 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service claims (parts A/B/D) to identify patients ≥ 65 age, diagnosed with RA and T2DM, and were either TNFi-experienced (switched from a TNFi to another tDMARD) or tDMARD-naïve, initiating their first tDMARD (abatacept, TNFi, or non-TNFi) between 2010 and 2017. Abatacept users were propensity-score (PS) matched to TNFi and other non-TNFi users separately on baseline demographics, comorbidities, medications, T2DM-related HCRU, and costs. Post-index follow-up: until discontinuation of index treatment, disenrollment, death, or end of study period, whichever occurred first. T2DM-related complications and HCRU were assessed. Costs were normalized to per-patient-per-month (PPPM) and inflated to 2019 US$.

RESULTS

The TNFi-experienced group included 2169 abatacept/TNFi and 2118 abatacept/other non-TNFi PS-matched pairs; the tDMARD-naïve group included 2667 abatacept/TNFi and 2247 abatacept/other non-TNFi PS-matched pairs. For TNFi-experienced patients, T2DM-related complication rates for inpatient settings PPPM trended lower for abatacept than TNFi (21 vs. 24, p = 0.046) and other non-TNFi groups (21 vs. 26; p < 0.0001). T2DM-related total costs PPPM for TNFi-experienced patients demonstrated lower trends for abatacept than TNFi ($489 vs. $594, p = 0.016) and other non-TNFi users ($493 vs. $606, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Medicare beneficiaries with RA and T2DM who switch to/initiate abatacept as their first tDMARD have directionally lower rates and costs of T2DM-related complications compared with patients switching to/initiating other tDMARDs. Abatacept treatment may help reduce clinical and economic burdens associated with T2DM in patients with RA.

摘要

引言

在类风湿关节炎(RA)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中使用靶向病情缓解抗风湿药(tDMARD)可能会提高全身胰岛素敏感性。比较阿巴西普与其他tDMARD对T2DM相关临床和经济影响的证据有限。本研究比较了RA和T2DM患者中T2DM相关医疗资源利用(HCRU)和成本的差异。

方法

这项回顾性研究使用100%的医疗保险按服务付费索赔(A/B/D部分)来识别年龄≥65岁、诊断为RA和T2DM的患者,这些患者要么有肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)使用经验(从TNFi转换为另一种tDMARD),要么是初治tDMARD患者,在2010年至2017年间开始使用他们的第一种tDMARD(阿巴西普、TNFi或非TNFi)。阿巴西普使用者在基线人口统计学、合并症、药物治疗、T2DM相关HCRU和成本方面分别与TNFi使用者和其他非TNFi使用者进行倾向评分(PS)匹配。索引后随访:直至索引治疗停药、退出研究、死亡或研究期结束,以先发生者为准。评估T2DM相关并发症和HCRU。成本按每位患者每月(PPPM)进行标准化,并折算为2019年美元。

结果

有TNFi使用经验的组包括2169对阿巴西普/TNFi和2118对阿巴西普/其他非TNFi PS匹配对;初治tDMARD组包括2667对阿巴西普/TNFi和2247对阿巴西普/其他非TNFi PS匹配对。对于有TNFi使用经验的患者,阿巴西普组的住院环境中T2DM相关并发症发生率PPPM趋势低于TNFi组(21比24,p = 0.046)和其他非TNFi组(21比26;p < 0.0001)。有TNFi使用经验的患者的T2DM相关总成本PPPM显示,阿巴西普组的趋势低于TNFi组(489美元对594美元,p = 0.016)和其他非TNFi使用者(493美元对606美元,p = 0.012)。

结论

与改用/开始使用其他tDMARD的患者相比,改用/开始使用阿巴西普作为第一种tDMARD的RA和T2DM医疗保险受益人在T2DM相关并发症的发生率和成本方面有降低的趋势。阿巴西普治疗可能有助于减轻RA患者中与T2DM相关的临床和经济负担。