• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑容量可预测原发性进行性失语症中 tDCS 的效果。

Brain volumes as predictors of tDCS effects in primary progressive aphasia.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States; Center for Language and Cognition Groningen (CLCG), University of Groningen, Netherlands.

Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2020 Jan;200:104707. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104707. Epub 2019 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104707
PMID:31704518
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7709910/
Abstract

The current study aims to determine the brain areas critical for response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in PPA. Anodal tDCS and sham were administered over the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), combined with written naming/spelling therapy. Thirty people with PPA were included in this study, and assessed immediately, 2 weeks, and 2 months post-therapy. We identified anatomical areas whose volumes significantly predicted the additional tDCS effects. For trained words, the volumes of the left Angular Gyrus and left Posterior Cingulate Cortex predicted the additional tDCS gain. For untrained words, the volumes of the left Middle Frontal Gyrus, left Supramarginal Gyrus, and right Posterior Cingulate Cortex predicted the additional tDCS gain. These findings show that areas involved in language, attention and working memory contribute to the maintenance and generalization of stimulation effects. The findings highlight that tDCS possibly affects areas anatomically or functionally connected to stimulation targets.

摘要

本研究旨在确定与阳极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)反应相关的大脑区域。在左侧额下回(IFG)上给予阳极 tDCS 和假刺激,并结合书面命名/拼写治疗。这项研究纳入了 30 名 PPA 患者,并在治疗后立即、2 周和 2 个月进行评估。我们确定了体积显著预测 tDCS 附加效应的解剖区域。对于训练过的单词,左角回和左后扣带回皮质的体积预测了 tDCS 的附加增益。对于未训练过的单词,左额中回、左缘上回和右后扣带回皮质的体积预测了 tDCS 的附加增益。这些发现表明,涉及语言、注意力和工作记忆的区域有助于刺激效应的维持和泛化。这些发现强调了 tDCS 可能会影响与刺激靶点在解剖学上或功能上相连的区域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d82f/7709910/d294e56ce02a/nihms-1574729-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d82f/7709910/887d0d5c5fd6/nihms-1574729-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d82f/7709910/d06a6819ec21/nihms-1574729-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d82f/7709910/f29e89a82367/nihms-1574729-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d82f/7709910/2cba414c196c/nihms-1574729-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d82f/7709910/d294e56ce02a/nihms-1574729-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d82f/7709910/887d0d5c5fd6/nihms-1574729-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d82f/7709910/d06a6819ec21/nihms-1574729-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d82f/7709910/f29e89a82367/nihms-1574729-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d82f/7709910/2cba414c196c/nihms-1574729-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d82f/7709910/d294e56ce02a/nihms-1574729-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Brain volumes as predictors of tDCS effects in primary progressive aphasia.脑容量可预测原发性进行性失语症中 tDCS 的效果。
Brain Lang. 2020 Jan;200:104707. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104707. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
2
The effect of tDCS on functional connectivity in primary progressive aphasia.经颅直流电刺激对原发性进行性失语症功能连接的影响。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 May 21;19:703-715. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.05.023. eCollection 2018.
3
White Matter Integrity Predicts Electrical Stimulation (tDCS) and Language Therapy Effects in Primary Progressive Aphasia.白质完整性可预测原发性进行性失语症中电刺激(tDCS)和语言治疗的效果。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Jan;35(1):44-57. doi: 10.1177/1545968320971741.
4
Cognitive and language performance predicts effects of spelling intervention and tDCS in Primary Progressive Aphasia.认知和语言表现预测拼写干预和 tDCS 在原发性进行性失语症中的效果。
Cortex. 2020 Mar;124:66-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
5
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Paired With Verb Network Strengthening Treatment Improves Verb Naming in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Case Series.经颅直流电刺激联合动词网络强化治疗改善原发性进行性失语症患者的动词命名:一项病例系列研究。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jul 12;31(4):1736-1754. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00272. Epub 2022 May 23.
6
Specificity in Generalization Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus in Primary Progressive Aphasia.左侧额下回经颅直流电刺激对原发性进行性失语症泛化效应的特异性。
Neuromodulation. 2023 Jun;26(4):850-860. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
7
Written Verb Naming Improves After tDCS Over the Left IFG in Primary Progressive Aphasia.在原发性进行性失语症患者的左侧额下回进行经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)后,书写动词命名能力得到改善。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 12;10:1396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01396. eCollection 2019.
8
Sleep as a predictor of tDCS and language therapy outcomes.睡眠作为 tDCS 和语言治疗结果的预测指标。
Sleep. 2022 Mar 14;45(3). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsab275.
9
"The effect of tDCS on functional connectivity in primary progressive aphasia" NeuroImage: Clinical, volume 19 (2018), pages 703-715.“经颅直流电刺激对原发性进行性失语症功能连接的影响”,《神经影像学:临床》,第19卷(2018年),第703 - 715页。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101734. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101734. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
10
Multifocal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia Does Not Provide a Clinical Benefit Over Speech Therapy.多部位经颅直流电刺激治疗原发性进行性失语症并不优于言语治疗。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;93(3):1169-1180. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230069.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol for a multisite study on the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation as an adjuvant to naming and spelling therapy in the treatment of oral and written naming in individuals with primary progressive aphasia.一项多中心研究的方案,该研究旨在探讨经颅直流电刺激作为命名和拼写治疗辅助手段,对原发性进行性失语症患者口语和书面命名治疗效果的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Sep 2;19:1611272. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1611272. eCollection 2025.
2
A multi-modal approach for the treatment of non-fluent/agrammatic variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia.一种治疗原发性进行性失语非流利型/语法缺失型的多模式方法。
Brain Commun. 2025 Sep 3;7(5):fcaf295. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf295. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Functional anomaly mapping reveals local and distant dysfunction caused by brain lesions.功能异常映射揭示了由脑损伤引起的局部和远程功能障碍。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 15;215:116806. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116806. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
2
Electrical brain stimulation in different variants of primary progressive aphasia: A randomized clinical trial.原发性进行性失语不同变体中的脑电刺激:一项随机临床试验。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Sep 5;4:461-472. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.08.002. eCollection 2018.
3
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Sham Stimulation to Treat Aphasia After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia Treatment: A Review.
经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激在原发性进行性失语症治疗中的疗效:一项综述
Brain Sci. 2025 Aug 5;15(8):839. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080839.
4
The role of structural and functional parameters in designing pathology-specific tDCS protocols for primary progressive aphasia.结构和功能参数在设计原发性进行性失语症特定病理经颅直流电刺激方案中的作用。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2025 Jul 14;17(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13195-025-01737-3.
5
Letter to the Editor Response to: Is Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Really Beneficial for Frontotemporal Dementia? (Published 12-18-2024).致编辑的信 对《经颅直流电刺激对额颞叶痴呆真的有益吗?》的回应(发表于2024年12月18日)
J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2025 May 30;17:11795735251339997. doi: 10.1177/11795735251339997. eCollection 2025.
6
Behavioral and neural effects of temporoparietal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia: a preliminary study.颞顶叶高清经颅直流电刺激对语法缺失型原发性进行性失语的行为和神经影响:一项初步研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 25;16:1492447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1492447. eCollection 2025.
7
Feasibility of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation combined with personalized word retrieval for improving naming in primary progressive aphasia.家庭式经颅直流电刺激联合个性化单词检索改善原发性进行性失语症命名能力的可行性
Front Neurol. 2025 Feb 11;16:1543712. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1543712. eCollection 2025.
8
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia with and Without Concomitant Speech and Language Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.原发性进行性失语症中无创脑刺激联合与不联合言语语言治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Feb 1. doi: 10.1007/s11065-025-09659-5.
9
Augmenting Verb-Naming Therapy With Neuromodulation Decelerates Language Loss in Primary Progressive Aphasia.用神经调节增强动词命名疗法可减缓原发性进行性失语症患者的语言丧失。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jan 7;34(1):155-173. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00016. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
10
Research progress of tDCS in the treatment of ADHD.经颅直流电刺激治疗注意缺陷多动障碍的研究进展
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2025 Feb;132(2):237-251. doi: 10.1007/s00702-024-02853-4. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
经颅直流电刺激与假刺激治疗脑卒中后失语症的随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Dec 1;75(12):1470-1476. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2287.
4
The effect of tDCS on functional connectivity in primary progressive aphasia.经颅直流电刺激对原发性进行性失语症功能连接的影响。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 May 21;19:703-715. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.05.023. eCollection 2018.
5
Predicting recovery in acute poststroke aphasia.预测急性脑卒中后失语症的恢复情况。
Ann Neurol. 2018 Mar;83(3):612-622. doi: 10.1002/ana.25184. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
6
Inferior parietal transcranial direct current stimulation with training improves cognition in anomic Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.经颅直流电刺激下顶叶并结合训练可改善命名性阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆患者的认知功能。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017 Mar 24;3(2):247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2017.03.003. eCollection 2017 Jun.
7
Baseline Performance Predicts tDCS-Mediated Improvements in Language Symptoms in Primary Progressive Aphasia.基线表现可预测经颅直流电刺激介导的原发性进行性失语症语言症状改善情况。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 30;11:347. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00347. eCollection 2017.
8
Semantic Feature Training in Combination with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Progressive Anomia.语义特征训练联合经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)治疗进行性命名性失语
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 May 16;11:253. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00253. eCollection 2017.
9
Right hemisphere structural adaptation and changing language skills years after left hemisphere stroke.左半球中风多年后右半球的结构适应性与语言技能变化
Brain. 2017 Jun 1;140(6):1718-1728. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx086.
10
Limits to tDCS effects in language: Failures to modulate word production in healthy participants with frontal or temporal tDCS.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对语言影响的局限性:对健康参与者进行额叶或颞叶tDCS未能调节词汇生成。
Cortex. 2017 Jan;86:64-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Nov 3.