Nursing school, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 550000, China.
2 Graduate School, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550000, China.
J Tradit Chin Med. 2022 Jun;42(3):321-331. doi: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2022.03.001.
To evaluate the efficacy of meridian massage on motor function after a stroke.
This systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomised (RCTs) and quasi-randomised controlled trials (qRCTs) was performed to determine the effects of meridian massage on motor dysfunction following a stroke. Articles published until December 2020 related to stroke and meridian massage from National Library of Medicine, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, KoreaMed, Japan science and Technology Agency, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and China Science and Technology Journal Database were searched. The primary outcomes included Fugl-Mayer Assessment (FMA), modified Barthel Index (mBI) and clinical efficiency, while the secondary outcomes included modified Ashworth (mAS) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Two authors independently selected the literature, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias, after which Meta-analysis with subgroups and sensitivity analysis was conducted.
A total of 16 RCTs and 3 q-RCTs involved 1556 patients satisfied the inclusion. Meta-analysis showed that compared to conventional rehabilitation, meridian massage had significantly better FMA [mean difference () = 1.16, 95% confidence interval (): 0.43, 1.89, = 0.002], FMA-L ( = 3.21, 95% : 1.97, 4.45, = 0.000 01), mBI ( = 8.87, 95% : 4.24, 13.49, = 0.000 02), clinical efficiency [relative risk (RR) = 1.37,95% : 1.24, 1.51, < 0.000 01], mAS ( = -0.69, 95% : -1.26, -0.11, = 0.02) and BBS ( = 5.07, 95% : 2.22, 7.93, = 0.0005). Subgroup analysis indicated no significant difference between meridian massage and control group when the intervention duration was >8 weeks ( = 0.89, 95% : -0.64, 2.42, = 0.25) but improving motor function in the meridian massage when the intervention duration was ≤ 8 weeks (< 4 weeks intervention duration = 0.84, 95% : 0.59, 1.10, < 0.000 01; 4-8 weeks = 2.41, 95% : 0.80, 4.01, = 0.003).
Meridian massage as an alternative and complementary therapy seems to have short-term benefits in improving post-stroke motor function (particularly in the lower limbs), quality of life, clinical efficiency, and balance stability and muscle spasms. The high heterogeneity of the included studies and the low methodological quality certainly limits the confidence placed in this systematic review and Meta-analysis, warranting future well-designed studies.
评估经络按摩对中风后运动功能的疗效。
本系统评价和荟萃分析纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)和准随机对照试验(qRCT),旨在确定经络按摩对中风后运动功能障碍的影响。从美国国立医学图书馆、考科兰中心对照试验注册库、Embase、韩国医学文献数据库、日本科学技术振兴机构、中国国家知识基础设施数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库和中国科技期刊数据库中检索了截至 2020 年 12 月与中风和经络按摩相关的文章。主要结局指标包括 Fugl-Meyer 评估(FMA)、改良巴氏指数(mBI)和临床疗效,次要结局指标包括改良 Ashworth 量表(mAS)和 Berg 平衡量表(BBS)。两名作者独立筛选文献、提取数据并评估偏倚风险,然后进行亚组分析和敏感性分析。
共纳入 16 项 RCT 和 3 项 qRCT,共 1556 例患者符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,与常规康复相比,经络按摩在 FMA [均数差值(MD)=1.16,95%置信区间(CI):0.43,1.89,=0.002]、FMA-L(MD=3.21,95%CI:1.97,4.45,=0.00001)、mBI(MD=8.87,95%CI:4.24,13.49,=0.00002)、临床疗效[相对危险度(RR)=1.37,95%CI:1.24,1.51,<0.00001]、mAS(MD=-0.69,95%CI:-1.26,-0.11,=0.02)和 BBS(MD=5.07,95%CI:2.22,7.93,=0.0005)方面均有显著改善。亚组分析表明,当干预持续时间>8 周时,经络按摩与对照组之间无显著差异(=0.89,95%CI:-0.64,2.42,=0.25),但当干预持续时间≤8 周时(干预持续时间<4 周:MD=0.84,95%CI:0.59,1.10,<0.00001;4-8 周:MD=2.41,95%CI:0.80,4.01,=0.003),经络按摩可改善运动功能。
作为一种替代和补充疗法,经络按摩似乎对改善中风后运动功能(尤其是下肢)、生活质量、临床疗效以及平衡稳定性和肌肉痉挛有短期益处。纳入研究的高度异质性和低方法学质量肯定限制了本系统评价和荟萃分析的可信度,需要未来进行设计良好的研究。