Suppr超能文献

超声弹性成像预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗反应的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Accuracy of ultrasound elastography for predicting breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chen Wei, Fang Li-Xiang, Chen Hai-Lan, Zheng Jian-Hua

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian 351100, Fujian Province, China.

出版信息

World J Clin Cases. 2022 Apr 16;10(11):3436-3448. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i11.3436.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported the prognostic value of ultrasound elastography (UE) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer. However, the assessment of parameters differed between shear-wave elastography and strain elastography in terms of measured elasticity parameter and mode of imaging. It is important, therefore, to assess the accuracy of the two modes of elastography.

AIM

To assess the accuracy of UE for predicting the pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients following NACT.

METHODS

A comprehensive and systematic search was performed in the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, PubMed Central, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane library from inception until December 2020. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA software "Midas" package.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies with 989 patients were included. The pooled sensitivities were 86% [95% confidence interval (CI): 76%-92%] for UE, 77% (95%CI: 68%-84%) for shear-wave elastography, and 92% (95%CI: 73%-98%) for strain-wave elastography. The pooled score specificities were 86% (95%CI: 80%-90%) for UE, 84% (95%CI: 72%-91%) for shear-wave elasticity, and 87% (95%CI: 81%-92%) for strain-wave elastography. A significant heterogeneity was found among studies based on the chi-square test results and an statistic > 75%.

CONCLUSION

Strain-wave type of UE can accurately predict the pCR following NACT amongst breast cancer patients. Studies exploring its accuracy in different ethnic populations are required to strengthen the evidence.

摘要

背景

多项研究报告了超声弹性成像(UE)在接受乳腺癌新辅助化疗(NACT)患者中的预后价值。然而,剪切波弹性成像和应变弹性成像在测量的弹性参数和成像模式方面的参数评估有所不同。因此,评估这两种弹性成像模式的准确性很重要。

目的

评估UE预测NACT后乳腺癌患者病理完全缓解(pCR)的准确性。

方法

从数据库建立至2020年12月,在MEDLINE、EMBASE、SCOPUS、PubMed Central、CINAHL、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行了全面系统的检索。使用STATA软件“Midas”包进行荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入14项研究,989例患者。UE的合并敏感度为86%[95%置信区间(CI):76%-92%],剪切波弹性成像为77%(95%CI:68%-84%),应变波弹性成像为92%(95%CI:73%-98%)。UE的合并评分特异性为86%(95%CI:80%-90%),剪切波弹性为84%(95%CI:72%-91%),应变波弹性成像为87%(95%CI:81%-92%)。根据卡方检验结果和I²统计量>75%,研究间存在显著异质性。

结论

应变波型UE能够准确预测乳腺癌患者NACT后的pCR。需要开展不同种族人群中探索其准确性的研究以加强证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c9/9048541/78e66007ea0e/WJCC-10-3436-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验