• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者安全信息学:评估医院数字化患者安全成熟度的标准制定。

Patient Safety Informatics: Criteria Development for Assessing the Maturity of Digital Patient Safety in Hospitals.

机构信息

Health Informatics Research Group, Osnabrück University AS, Germany.

Center for Clinical Informatics and Improvement Research, University of California San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 25;294:885-889. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220618.

DOI:10.3233/SHTI220618
PMID:35612236
Abstract

With the start of the 21st century, patient safety as a topic of special interest has attracted increasing attention in both academia and clinical practice. As technology has continued to develop since then, questions and focal points surrounding the topic have also shifted. In particular, questions regarding the impact of digitalization on patient safety and its measurement are now of high interest. This work aims to develop a maturity assessment instrument in the form of a criteria set for measuring structural requirements for digital patient safety in hospitals. Based on the results of a literature review and a derivation of maturity objects (MO) from known maturity models, 64 criteria across 11 categories were developed. Written comments of two digital patient safety experts as well as subsequent interviews were used to evaluate and refine the criteria catalog. The resulting catalog offers hospitals guidance for detecting possible areas of structural improvements in their information systems with regard to patient safety and represents a unique instrument for assessing digital maturity in this particular area.

摘要

随着 21 世纪的开始,作为一个特别关注的话题,患者安全在学术界和临床实践中引起了越来越多的关注。自那时以来,随着技术的不断发展,围绕该主题的问题和焦点也发生了转移。特别是,关于数字化对患者安全的影响及其衡量标准的问题现在非常关注。这项工作旨在开发一种成熟度评估工具,以准则集的形式衡量医院数字患者安全的结构要求。基于文献回顾的结果和从已知成熟度模型中推导出的成熟度对象 (MO),制定了 11 个类别下的 64 个标准。两位数字患者安全专家的书面意见以及随后的访谈用于评估和完善标准目录。由此产生的目录为医院提供了指导,帮助他们检测信息系统中可能存在的与患者安全相关的结构改进领域,并代表了评估该特定领域数字化成熟度的独特工具。

相似文献

1
Patient Safety Informatics: Criteria Development for Assessing the Maturity of Digital Patient Safety in Hospitals.患者安全信息学:评估医院数字化患者安全成熟度的标准制定。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 25;294:885-889. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220618.
2
Improving Digital Hospital Transformation: Development of an Outcomes-Based Infrastructure Maturity Assessment Framework.改善数字医院转型:基于成果的基础设施成熟度评估框架的开发
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Jan 11;7(1):e12465. doi: 10.2196/12465.
3
Synthesizing Dimensions of Digital Maturity in Hospitals: Systematic Review.医院数字化成熟度维度的综合:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 30;24(3):e32994. doi: 10.2196/32994.
4
Safety risks associated with the lack of integration and interfacing of hospital health information technologies: a qualitative study of hospital electronic prescribing systems in England.与医院健康信息技术缺乏整合和接口相关的安全风险:对英国医院电子处方系统的定性研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jul;26(7):530-541. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004925. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
A Patient-Centered Framework for Evaluating Digital Maturity of Health Services: A Systematic Review.以患者为中心的卫生服务数字成熟度评估框架:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 14;18(4):e75. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5047.
6
Assessing the level of digital maturity of enterprises in the Central and Eastern European countries using the MCDM and Shannon's entropy methods.采用多准则决策(MCDM)和香农熵方法评估中东欧国家企业的数字化成熟度。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 6;16(7):e0253965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253965. eCollection 2021.
7
Managing Directors' Perspectives on Digital Maturity in German Hospitals-A Multi-Point Online-Based Survey Study.德国医院数字化成熟度的总经理观点——一项多点在线调查研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 6;19(15):9709. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159709.
8
A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity.医院安全文化成熟度的自我评估模型。
J Public Health Res. 2022 Mar 10;11(2):2530. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2022.2530.
9
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中动脉内脑溶栓的试验设计与报告标准。
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17.
10
Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review.评估实时患者体验反馈系统的数字成熟度和患者可接受性:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 14;21(1):e9076. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9076.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing the Digital Health Communication Maturity Model: Systematic Review.开发数字健康传播成熟度模型:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 14;27:e68344. doi: 10.2196/68344.