Suppr超能文献

运动对 NCAA 第三赛区大学生运动员去脂体重指数的影响存在差异。

Sport Differences in Fat-Free Mass Index Among a Diverse Sample of NCAA Division III Collegiate Athletes.

机构信息

Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Onalaska, Wisconsin.

Exercise & Sport Science, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, Wisconsin; and.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Aug 1;36(8):2212-2217. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004267. Epub 2022 May 24.

Abstract

Brandner, CF, Harty, PS, Luedke, JA, Erickson, JL, and Jagim, AR. Sport differences in fat-free mass index among a diverse sample of NCAA Division III collegiate athletes. J Strength Cond Res 36(8): 2212-2217, 2022-Fat-free mass index (FFMI) is becoming a popular metric to determine an athlete's potential for future fat-free mass accrual or to identify athletes who may be at risk for low fat-free mass (FFM). The aim of the current study was to examine sport-specific differences in FFMI among a cohort of collegiate athletes. NCAA Division III male ( n = 98; age: 20.1 ± 1.6 years, height: 1.82 ± 0.06 m, body mass: 92.7 ± 17.5 kg, %BF: 15.6 ± 8.8%) and female ( n = 92; age: 19.45 ± 1.1 years, height: 1.68 ± 0.06 m, body mass: 65.16 ± 11.04 kg, %BF: 22.71 ± 5.9%) athletes completed a body composition assessment using air displacement plethysmography. Fat-free mass index was calculated by dividing FFM by height squared. The mean ± SD FFMI was significantly higher ( p < 0.05) for males (23.37 ± 2.41 kg·m -2 ) compared with females (17.54 ± 1.8 kg·m -2 ). There was a significant main effect for sport category. Post hoc analysis indicated that throwers had a higher ( p < 0.001) FFMI (mean difference, 95% confidence interval) compared with sprinters and soccer athletes (4.17, 2.03-6.32 kg·m -2 ), endurance and weight-sensitive athletes (4.91, 2.67-7.14 kg·m -2 ), and court sport athletes (4.39, 1.97-6.81 kg·m -2 ), respectively, among female athletes. Post hoc analysis indicated that football players had a higher ( p < 0.01) FFMI than distance runners (3.89, 2.15, 5.62) and wrestlers (2.23, 0.78, 3.68), among male athletes. These findings indicate that sex differences in FFMI exist, with differences identified between sports. These findings can guide strength and nutritional programming decisions by providing sport-specific normative data profiles.

摘要

布兰德纳,CF,哈蒂,PS,卢德克,JA,埃里克森,JL,和贾吉姆,AR。NCAA 第三分部大学生运动员群体中不同运动项目的去脂体重指数差异。J 力量与调理研究 36(8):2212-2217,2022-去脂体重指数(FFMI)正成为一种流行的指标,用于确定运动员未来去脂体重的增长潜力,或识别可能存在低去脂体重(FFM)风险的运动员。本研究的目的是检查大学生运动员群体中特定运动项目的 FFMI 差异。NCAA 第三分部的男性(n=98;年龄:20.1±1.6 岁,身高:1.82±0.06 m,体重:92.7±17.5 kg,体脂百分比:15.6±8.8%)和女性(n=92;年龄:19.45±1.1 岁,身高:1.68±0.06 m,体重:65.16±11.04 kg,体脂百分比:22.71±5.9%)使用空气置换体描仪完成了身体成分评估。FFMI 通过将 FFM 除以身高的平方来计算。男性(23.37±2.41 kg·m-2)的平均±SD FFMI 显著高于女性(17.54±1.8 kg·m-2)(p<0.05)。运动类别存在显著的主要效应。事后分析表明,投掷运动员的 FFMI 高于短跑运动员和足球运动员(4.17,2.03-6.32 kg·m-2)、耐力和体重敏感运动员(4.91,2.67-7.14 kg·m-2)和球场运动运动员(4.39,1.97-6.81 kg·m-2)(p<0.001)。事后分析表明,足球运动员的 FFMI 高于长跑运动员(3.89,2.15,5.62)和摔跤运动员(2.23,0.78,3.68)(p<0.01),男性运动员。这些发现表明,FFMI 存在性别差异,并且在运动项目之间存在差异。这些发现可以通过提供特定于运动的规范数据谱来指导力量和营养计划决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验