• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众与患者的健康偏好:一项研究方案,旨在为曾在重症监护病房接受过治疗的患者获取 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态估值。

Public versus patient health preferences: protocol for a study to elicit EQ-5D-5L health state valuations for patients who have survived a stay in intensive care.

机构信息

Department of Real-World Evidence, NHTA, Copenhagen, Denmark

Danish Centre for Health Economics (DaCHE), Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 May 25;12(5):e058500. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058500.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058500
PMID:35613809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9134168/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The value set used when calculating quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) is most often based on stated preference data elicited from a representative sample of the general population. However, having a severe disease may alter a person's health preferences, which may imply that, for some patient groups, experienced QALYs may differ from those that are estimated via standard methods. This study aims to model 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) valuations based on preferences elicited from a sample of patients who have survived a stay in a Danish intensive care unit (ICU) and to compare these with the preferences of the general population. Further, the heterogeneity in the ICU patients' preferences will be investigated.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This valuation study will elicit EQ-5D-5L health state preferences from a sample of 300 respondents enrolled in two randomised controlled trials at Danish ICUs. Patients' preferences will be elicited using composite time trade-off based on the EuroQol Valuation Technology, the same as that used to generate the EQ-5D-5L value set for the Danish general population. The patient-based and the public-based EQ-5D-5L valuations will be compared. Potential underlying determinants of the ICU preferences will be investigated through analyses of demographic characteristics, time since the ICU stay, self-reported health, willingness to trade-off length of life for quality of life, health state reference dependency and EQ-5D dimensions that patients have experienced themselves during their illness.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Under Danish regulations, ethical approval is not required for studies of this type. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at national and international conferences. The modelling algorithms will be publicly available for statistical software, such as Stata and R.

摘要

简介

计算质量调整生命年(QALYs)时使用的价值集最常用于从一般人群的代表性样本中得出的陈述偏好数据。然而,患有严重疾病可能会改变一个人的健康偏好,这可能意味着对于某些患者群体,经验 QALYs 可能与通过标准方法估计的 QALYs 不同。本研究旨在基于从丹麦重症监护病房(ICU)住院的患者样本中得出的偏好来构建 5 级欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)量表评分,并将其与一般人群的偏好进行比较。此外,还将研究 ICU 患者偏好的异质性。

方法和分析

这项评估研究将从丹麦 ICU 中参加两项随机对照试验的 300 名受访者中收集 EQ-5D-5L 健康状况偏好。患者的偏好将使用基于 EuroQol 估值技术的复合时间交易来衡量,这与用于为丹麦一般人群生成 EQ-5D-5L 值集的方法相同。将比较基于患者的和基于公众的 EQ-5D-5L 评估。通过分析人口统计学特征、从 ICU 住院以来的时间、自我报告的健康状况、愿意用生命长度换取生活质量、健康状态参考依赖性以及患者在患病期间经历过的 EQ-5D 维度,研究 ICU 偏好的潜在潜在决定因素。

伦理和传播

根据丹麦法规,不需要对这种类型的研究进行伦理批准。将从所有患者处获得书面知情同意。研究结果将发表在同行评议的科学期刊上,并在国家和国际会议上展示。建模算法将公开提供给统计软件,如 Stata 和 R。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dec3/9134168/e87d5543c2ae/bmjopen-2021-058500f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dec3/9134168/e87d5543c2ae/bmjopen-2021-058500f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dec3/9134168/e87d5543c2ae/bmjopen-2021-058500f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Public versus patient health preferences: protocol for a study to elicit EQ-5D-5L health state valuations for patients who have survived a stay in intensive care.公众与患者的健康偏好:一项研究方案,旨在为曾在重症监护病房接受过治疗的患者获取 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态估值。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 25;12(5):e058500. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058500.
2
A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.一种用于获取健康状态偏好的混合建模方法:葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study.针对德国人群采用综合时间权衡法对EQ-5D-5L进行估值——一项探索性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Feb 20;15(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0617-9.
4
Elicitation of Norwegian EQ-5D-5L values for hypothetical and experience-based health states based on the EuroQol Valuation Technology (EQ-VT) protocol.基于 EuroQol 估值技术(EQ-VT)协议,对假设和基于经验的健康状况进行挪威 EQ-5D-5L 值的 elicitation。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 11;10(6):e034683. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034683.
5
Experience-Based Swedish TTO and VAS Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L Health States.基于经验的瑞典 TTO 和 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态下的 VAS 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Aug;38(8):839-856. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00905-7.
6
Determinants of time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-5L health states: data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.EQ-5D-5L健康状态的时间权衡估值的决定因素:来自加拿大EQ-5D-5L估值研究的数据。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1679-85. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1203-4. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
7
Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report.EQ-5D 价目表重新评估的预备研究:方法报告。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Feb;18(12):vii-xxvi, 1-191. doi: 10.3310/hta18120.
8
UK Valuation of EQ-5D-5L, a Generic Measure of Health-Related Quality of Life: A Study Protocol.英国对 EQ-5D-5L 的评估,一种通用的健康相关生活质量衡量标准:研究方案。
Value Health. 2023 Nov;26(11):1625-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.08.005. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
9
Measuring health-related quality of life in the general population and Roma communities in Romania: study protocol for two cross-sectional studies.在罗马尼亚的普通人群和罗姆社区中测量与健康相关的生活质量:两项横断面研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 18;9(8):e029067. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029067.
10
Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets.平行评估:EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 社会价值集的直接比较。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Nov;38(8):968-982. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18802797.

引用本文的文献

1
Valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states from cancer patients' perspective: a feasibility study.癌症患者视角下 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态的评估:一项可行性研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Aug;25(6):915-924. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01635-1. Epub 2023 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Does a health crisis change how we value health?健康危机是否会改变我们对健康的重视程度?
Health Econ. 2021 Sep;30(10):2547-2560. doi: 10.1002/hec.4399. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
2
The Danish EQ-5D-5L Value Set: A Hybrid Model Using cTTO and DCE Data.丹麦 EQ-5D-5L 值集:使用 cTTO 和 DCE 数据的混合模型。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jul;19(4):579-591. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00639-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
3
Lower or Higher Oxygenation Targets for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure.急性低氧性呼吸衰竭的低氧或高氧目标。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 8;384(14):1301-1311. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032510. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
4
Elicitation of Norwegian EQ-5D-5L values for hypothetical and experience-based health states based on the EuroQol Valuation Technology (EQ-VT) protocol.基于 EuroQol 估值技术(EQ-VT)协议,对假设和基于经验的健康状况进行挪威 EQ-5D-5L 值的 elicitation。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 11;10(6):e034683. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034683.
5
Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines.哪些多属性效用仪器推荐用于成本效用分析?国家卫生技术评估(HTA)指南的回顾。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Nov;21(8):1245-1257. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01195-8. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
6
Conservative vs liberal fluid therapy in septic shock (CLASSIC) trial-Protocol and statistical analysis plan.保守与自由液体治疗脓毒性休克(CLASSIC)试验:方案与统计分析计划。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Oct;63(9):1262-1271. doi: 10.1111/aas.13434. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
7
Handling Oxygenation Targets in the Intensive Care Unit (HOT-ICU)-Protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing a lower vs a higher oxygenation target in adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.《重症监护病房氧合目标处理(HOT-ICU)研究方案》——一项比较急性低氧性呼吸衰竭成人患者低氧合目标与高氧合目标的随机临床试验
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Aug;63(7):956-965. doi: 10.1111/aas.13356. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
8
Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol.概述、更新以及从国际 EQ-5D-5L 估值工作中吸取的经验教训:EQ-5D-5L 估值议定书第 2 版。
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
9
Are preferences over health states informed?对健康状态的偏好是否有充分依据?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 18;15(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0678-9.
10
Questioning the differences between general public vs. patient based preferences towards EQ-5D-5L defined hypothetical health states.质疑一般公众与基于患者的偏好之间对 EQ-5D-5L 定义的假设健康状态的差异。
Health Policy. 2019 Feb;123(2):166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 28.