• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦 EQ-5D-5L 值集:使用 cTTO 和 DCE 数据的混合模型。

The Danish EQ-5D-5L Value Set: A Hybrid Model Using cTTO and DCE Data.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark and OPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jul;19(4):579-591. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00639-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-021-00639-3
PMID:33527304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8270796/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) are expected to be used for priority setting of hospital-dispensed medicines in Denmark from 2021. The aim of this study was to develop the first Danish value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on interviews with a representative sample of the Danish adult population.

METHODS

A nationally representative sample based on age (> 18 years), gender, education, and geographical region was recruited using data provided by Statistics Denmark. Computer-assisted personal interviews were carried out using the EQ-VT 2.1. Respondents each valued ten health states using composite time trade-off (cTTO) and seven health states using discrete-choice experiment (DCE). Different predictive models were explored using cTTO and DCE data alone or in combination as hybrid models. Model performance was assessed using logical consistency.

RESULTS

A total of 1014 interviews were included in the analyses. The sample was representative of the Danish adult population, though the sample contained slightly more respondents with higher education than in the general population. Only the heteroscedastic censored hybrid model combining cTTO and DCE data yielded consistent results, and hence was chosen for modelling the final Danish value set. The predicted values ranged from - 0.757 to 1, and anxiety/depression was the dimension assigned most value by respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

This study established the Danish EQ-5D-5L value set, which represents the preferences of the Danish general population, and is expected to provide key input for healthcare decision-making in a Danish context.

摘要

目的

自 2021 年起,丹麦预计将使用质量调整生命年(QALYs)来确定医院配药的优先次序。本研究旨在基于对丹麦成年人群体的代表性样本进行访谈,开发首个基于 EQ-5D-5L 的丹麦效用值量表。

方法

采用丹麦统计局提供的数据,基于年龄(>18 岁)、性别、教育程度和地理区域,招募了一个具有全国代表性的样本。采用计算机辅助个人访谈,使用 EQ-VT 2.1 进行。受访者分别使用综合时间权衡法(cTTO)和离散选择实验(DCE)对十种健康状态进行估值,对七种健康状态进行估值。使用 cTTO 和 DCE 数据单独或组合作为混合模型,探索了不同的预测模型。使用逻辑一致性评估模型性能。

结果

共纳入 1014 次访谈进行分析。该样本具有代表性,与丹麦成年人口特征相符,但样本中接受高等教育的受访者比例略高于一般人群。只有结合 cTTO 和 DCE 数据的异方差 censored 混合模型得出了一致的结果,因此被选为建模最终的丹麦效用值量表。预测值范围为-0.757 至 1,受访者对焦虑/抑郁维度赋予的价值最高。

结论

本研究建立了丹麦 EQ-5D-5L 效用值量表,代表了丹麦普通人群的偏好,预计将为丹麦背景下的医疗保健决策提供关键投入。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6bd/8270796/a6ca281c0c4d/40258_2021_639_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6bd/8270796/47d9c351c4b1/40258_2021_639_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6bd/8270796/66837700b4b3/40258_2021_639_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6bd/8270796/a6ca281c0c4d/40258_2021_639_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6bd/8270796/47d9c351c4b1/40258_2021_639_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6bd/8270796/66837700b4b3/40258_2021_639_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6bd/8270796/a6ca281c0c4d/40258_2021_639_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Danish EQ-5D-5L Value Set: A Hybrid Model Using cTTO and DCE Data.丹麦 EQ-5D-5L 值集:使用 cTTO 和 DCE 数据的混合模型。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jul;19(4):579-591. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00639-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
2
A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.一种用于获取健康状态偏好的混合建模方法:葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.基于DCE和/或TTO数据的价值集比较:日本EQ-5D-5L健康状态评分
Value Health. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(5):648-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1834. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
4
Peruvian Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L: A Direct Comparison of Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.秘鲁的 EQ-5D-5L 评估:时间权衡和离散选择实验的直接比较。
Value Health. 2020 Jul;23(7):880-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
5
Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.EQ-5D五级版本的荷兰关税。
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
6
United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.美国使用国际协议对 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态进行评估。
Value Health. 2019 Aug;22(8):931-941. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 May 25.
7
A national survey of Iranian general population to estimate a value set for the EQ-5D-5L.一项针对伊朗普通人群的全国性调查,旨在估算 EQ-5D-5L 的效价值。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Jul;32(7):2079-2087. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03378-1. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
8
An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Belgium.比利时的EQ-5D-5L价值集。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 Nov;6(6):823-836. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00353-3. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
9
The EQ-5D-5L valuation study for Trinidad and Tobago.特立尼达和多巴哥的 EQ-5D-5L 估值研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jul 2;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02266-7.
10
An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Vietnam.越南的 EQ-5D-5L 价值集。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jul;29(7):1923-1933. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02469-7. Epub 2020 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Disability and Factors Associated with Disability in the Discharge Transition Phase After Acquired Brain Injury: An Observational Follow-Up Study.后天性脑损伤后出院过渡阶段的残疾及与残疾相关的因素:一项观察性随访研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;13(16):1989. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161989.
2
Exploring functioning and health-related quality of life in patients referred to a diagnostic cancer pathway for non-specific serious symptoms.探索因非特异性严重症状转诊至癌症诊断路径的患者的功能及与健康相关的生活质量。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 20;33(9):800. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09825-8.
3
Are physical activity, sleep, and joint pain associated with physical function and quality of life in individuals with multimorbidity? A cross-sectional analysis of the MOBILIZE trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Do Discrete Choice Experiments Approaches Perform Better Than Time Trade-Off in Eliciting Health State Utilities? Evidence From SF-6Dv2 in China.离散选择实验法在健康状态效用 elicitation 中是否优于时间权衡法?来自中国 SF-6Dv2 的证据。
Value Health. 2020 Oct;23(10):1391-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
2
Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines.哪些多属性效用仪器推荐用于成本效用分析?国家卫生技术评估(HTA)指南的回顾。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Nov;21(8):1245-1257. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01195-8. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
3
身体活动、睡眠和关节疼痛与患有多种疾病的个体的身体功能和生活质量是否相关?MOBILIZE试验的横断面分析。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Aug 9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04044-4.
4
Rectal Cancer Pain Score: A prospective cohort validation study across recovery stages.直肠癌疼痛评分:一项针对康复各阶段的前瞻性队列验证研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Aug;27(8):e70198. doi: 10.1111/codi.70198.
5
Generic health status improves after non-surgically and surgically treated hip abductor tendon pathology: a retrospective study of ninety-seven female patients.非手术和手术治疗髋外展肌腱病变后总体健康状况改善:对97例女性患者的回顾性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 10;26(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08889-1.
6
Impact of an in-consult patient decision aid on decisional quality, involvement, and health outcome for patients with severe hip or knee osteoarthritis - a study protocol for a multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial (PATI-study).会诊时患者决策辅助工具对重度髋或膝骨关节炎患者决策质量、参与度及健康结局的影响——一项多中心整群随机对照试验的研究方案(PATI研究)
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 2;26(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08856-w.
7
Exercise therapy and self-management support for individuals with multimorbidity: a randomized and controlled trial.针对患有多种疾病的个体的运动疗法和自我管理支持:一项随机对照试验。
Nat Med. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03779-4.
8
Optimal DCE design for modelling nonlinear time preferences in EQ-5D-5L valuation studies: exploration of data from Denmark and Peru.EQ-5D-5L 估值研究中用于模拟非线性时间偏好的最优 DCE 设计:丹麦和秘鲁数据探索
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Jun 15;23(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02391-x.
9
Validity, reliability, responsiveness and interpretability of the EFAS-DK PROM: an observational cohort study of Danish speaking foot and ankle patients.EFAS-DK患者报告结局量表的效度、信度、反应度及可解释性:一项针对丹麦语足踝患者的观察性队列研究
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Jun 13;9(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00897-y.
10
Digital Readiness Among 3555 Individuals With Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis Initiating a Supervised Education and Exercise Therapy Programme: A Cross-Sectional Study.3555名髋或膝骨关节炎患者开始接受监督教育和运动治疗计划时的数字准备情况:一项横断面研究
Musculoskeletal Care. 2025 Jun;23(2):e70127. doi: 10.1002/msc.70127.
An exploration of methods for obtaining 0 = dead anchors for latent scale EQ-5D-Y values.
探索获取潜在规模 EQ-5D-Y 值的 0= 死亡锚点的方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Sep;21(7):1091-1103. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01205-9. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
4
Transforming discrete choice experiment latent scale values for EQ-5D-3L using the visual analogue scale.使用视觉模拟量表转换 EQ-5D-3L 的离散选择实验潜在标度值。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jul;21(5):787-800. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01173-0. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
5
A French Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.一个用于 EQ-5D-5L 的法国价值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Apr;38(4):413-425. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00876-4.
6
Valuing Health State: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Ethiopians.重视健康状况:埃塞俄比亚人的 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2020 Sep;22:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.08.475. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
7
United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.美国使用国际协议对 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态进行评估。
Value Health. 2019 Aug;22(8):931-941. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 May 25.
8
A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.一种用于获取健康状态偏好的混合建模方法:葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
9
Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States in Poland: the First EQ-VT-Based Study in Central and Eastern Europe.波兰的 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态估值:中欧和东欧的首次基于 EQ-VT 的研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Sep;37(9):1165-1176. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00811-7.
10
Valuation of Health States Considered to Be Worse Than Death-An Analysis of Composite Time Trade-Off Data From 5 EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies.被认为比死亡更糟糕的健康状态的估值——来自 5 项 EQ-5D-5L 估值研究的综合时间权衡数据分析。
Value Health. 2019 Mar;22(3):370-376. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Nov 12.