• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术术后早期限制下床活动是否有利于治疗效果或降低复发率。

Whether Out-of-Bed Activity Restriction in the Early Postoperative Period of PELD Is Beneficial to Therapeutic Efficacy or Reduce Recurrence.

作者信息

Liang Xiao, Wang Yexin, Yue Yaosheng, Li Yanpeng, Meng Chunyang

机构信息

Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, China.

Jiaxiang Peaple's Hospital, Jining, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2022 May 9;9:860140. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.860140. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.860140
PMID:35615646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9124801/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To detect the influences of postoperative out-of-bed activity restriction on recurrence rate, low back and leg pain, functional rehabilitation after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD).

METHODS

In this research, 213 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (LDH) who underwent PELD were divided into the out-of-bed activity restriction group and out-of-bed activity non-restriction group. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate postoperative clinical efficacy at 1 and 3 months after the operation, and to count the recurrence rates. All of these operations were performed between August 2017 and July 2020, and they were followed in the outpatient department for 12 months at least.

RESULTS

Both of the groups showed significantly lower VAS and higher ODI scores at 1 month and 3 months post-operation, respectively, when compared with pre-operation. At 1 month after the operation, the restriction group performed lower VAS scores of low back pain compared with the non-restriction group, but this advantage disappeared at 3months post-operation. However, there was no statistical difference in the VAS scores of leg pain and ODI scores between the two groups, neither at 1 nor 3 months after the surgery. The recurrence rate is significantly lower in the restriction group than in the non-restriction group at a 12-month follow-up after the surgery.

CONCLUSION

Out-of-bed activity restriction in the early postoperative period of PELD could reduce LDH recurrence effectively, and it may relieve the low back pain to some extent. It has no benefit in the recovery of leg pain and functional rehabilitation.

摘要

目的

探讨经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)术后限制下床活动对复发率、腰腿痛及功能康复的影响。

方法

本研究将213例行PELD的腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者分为下床活动限制组和下床活动非限制组。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估术后1个月和3个月的临床疗效,并计算复发率。所有手术均在2017年8月至2020年7月期间进行,术后至少在门诊随访12个月。

结果

与术前相比,两组患者术后1个月和3个月的VAS评分均显著降低,ODI评分均显著升高。术后1个月,限制组的腰痛VAS评分低于非限制组,但术后3个月该优势消失。然而,两组患者术后1个月和3个月的腿痛VAS评分及ODI评分均无统计学差异。术后12个月随访时,限制组的复发率显著低于非限制组。

结论

PELD术后早期限制下床活动可有效降低LDH复发率,并在一定程度上缓解腰痛。对腿痛恢复及功能康复无益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27c3/9124801/642bed36bae8/fsurg-09-860140-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27c3/9124801/a8fc496807d0/fsurg-09-860140-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27c3/9124801/b4b6d5fc608e/fsurg-09-860140-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27c3/9124801/642bed36bae8/fsurg-09-860140-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27c3/9124801/a8fc496807d0/fsurg-09-860140-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27c3/9124801/b4b6d5fc608e/fsurg-09-860140-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27c3/9124801/642bed36bae8/fsurg-09-860140-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Whether Out-of-Bed Activity Restriction in the Early Postoperative Period of PELD Is Beneficial to Therapeutic Efficacy or Reduce Recurrence.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术术后早期限制下床活动是否有利于治疗效果或降低复发率。
Front Surg. 2022 May 9;9:860140. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.860140. eCollection 2022.
2
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via Transforaminal Approach Combined with Interlaminar Approach for L4/5 and L5/S1 Two-Level Disc Herniation.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术联合经椎间孔入路与经椎板间入路治疗 L4/5 和 L5/S1 双节段椎间盘突出症
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):979-988. doi: 10.1111/os.12862. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
3
Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术与微创经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的日间手术疗效比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 9;22(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04038-6.
4
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与显微镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):923-937. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4253-8. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
6
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) via a Transforaminal and Interlaminar Combined Approach for Very Highly Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH) Between L4/5 and L5/S1 Level.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)联合经椎间孔入路和经椎间孔入路治疗 L4/5 和 L5/S1 水平之间非常高迁移腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jun 7;26:e922777. doi: 10.12659/MSM.922777.
7
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Modic Changes via a Transforaminal Approach: A Retrospective Study.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗伴有 Modic 改变的腰椎间盘突出症:一项回顾性研究。
Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):E601-E608.
8
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using a Double-Cannula Guide Tube for Large Lumbar Disc Herniation.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术采用双套管导引导管治疗大型腰椎间盘突出症。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jul;14(7):1385-1394. doi: 10.1111/os.13313. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
9
Which clinical and radiological variables could predict clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treatment of patients with lumbosacral disc herniation?哪些临床和影像学变量可以预测经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰骶椎间盘突出症患者的临床结局?
Spine J. 2018 Aug;18(8):1338-1346. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.12.010. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
10
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 15;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02929-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Nomogram Predicting Postoperative Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation Based on Activity Factors.基于活动因素的腰椎间盘突出症术后复发预测列线图的开发与验证
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Mar 23;17:689-699. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S453819. eCollection 2024.
2
Postoperative MRI Findings Following PELD and Their Correlations with Clinical Prognosis are Investigated by Injecting Contrast into Annulus Fibrosus Intraoperatively.通过术中向纤维环注射造影剂来研究经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)后的术后MRI表现及其与临床预后的相关性。
J Pain Res. 2024 Jan 30;17:381-392. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S442224. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A Postoperative Phenomenon of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Rebound Pain.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术的术后现象:反弹痛。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec;13(8):2196-2205. doi: 10.1111/os.13088. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
2
Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for single l4/5-level lumbar disk herniation.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗单节段L4/5腰椎间盘突出症的临床比较
Pain Pract. 2022 Feb;22(2):191-199. doi: 10.1111/papr.13078. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
3
Efficacy of lumbar kinetic chain training for staged rehabilitation after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.
Does Immediate Postoperative Early Ambulation Affect Clinical Results of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy? A Historical Control Study of Daytime Operation with a 8-Hour Hospital Stay versus Inpatient Operation.
即刻术后早期活动是否会影响全内镜腰椎间盘切除术的临床效果?日间 8 小时住院手术与住院手术的历史对照研究。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Sep;15(9):2354-2362. doi: 10.1111/os.13814. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
4
Risk factors for lumbar disc herniation recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a meta-analysis of 58 cohort studies.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症后复发的危险因素:58 项队列研究的荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Jul 1;46(1):159. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02041-0.
经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术后分阶段康复中腰椎动力链训练的疗效
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 15;22(1):793. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04674-y.
4
Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion as a Revision Surgery for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术作为经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术后复发性腰椎间盘突出症翻修手术的比较
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020 Dec 8;16:1185-1193. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S283652. eCollection 2020.
5
Ex-vivo biomechanics of repaired rat intervertebral discs using genipin crosslinked fibrin adhesive hydrogel.使用京尼平交联纤维蛋白粘合剂水凝胶修复大鼠椎间盘的体外生物力学研究
J Biomech. 2020 Dec 2;113:110100. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110100. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
Effect of time to first ambulation on recurrence after PELD.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后首次下床活动时间对复发的影响。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Feb 27;15(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01608-7.
7
Comparison of Effects of PELD and Fenestration in the Treatment of Geriatric Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis.老年腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与开窗术治疗效果比较。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Dec 16;14:2187-2194. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S226295. eCollection 2019.
8
Predictive Scoring and Risk Factors of Early Recurrence after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗后早期复发的预测评分和危险因素。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Nov 7;2019:6492675. doi: 10.1155/2019/6492675. eCollection 2019.
9
The biomechanical effects of graded upper articular process arthroplasty on lumbar spine: A finite element study.分级上关节突关节置换术对腰椎的生物力学影响:一项有限元研究。
J Orthop Sci. 2020 Sep;25(5):793-799. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.10.012. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
10
[Clinical observation of the low back pain and posterior thigh pain in the early stage after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy].经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术早期腰背痛及大腿后侧疼痛的临床观察
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 20;99(31):2445-2449. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.31.008.