Rogers Bruce, Gronwald Thomas
College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Institute of Interdisciplinary Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Physiol. 2022 May 9;13:879071. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.879071. eCollection 2022.
While established methods for determining physiologic exercise thresholds and intensity distribution such as gas exchange or lactate testing are appropriate for the laboratory setting, they are not easily obtainable for most participants. Data over the past two years has indicated that the short-term scaling exponent alpha1 of Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA a1), a heart rate variability (HRV) index representing the degree of fractal correlation properties of the cardiac beat sequence, shows promise as an alternative for exercise load assessment. Unlike conventional HRV indexes, it possesses a dynamic range throughout all intensity zones and does not require prior calibration with an incremental exercise test. A DFA a1 value of 0.75, reflecting values midway between well correlated fractal patterns and uncorrelated behavior, has been shown to be associated with the aerobic threshold in elite, recreational and cardiac disease populations and termed the heart rate variability threshold (HRVT). Further loss of fractal correlation properties indicative of random beat patterns, signifying an autonomic state of unsustainability (DFA a1 of 0.5), may be associated with that of the anaerobic threshold. There is minimal bias in DFA a1 induced by common artifact correction methods at levels below 3% and negligible change in HRVT even at levels of 6%. DFA a1 has also shown value for exercise load management in situations where standard intensity targets can be skewed such as eccentric cycling. Currently, several web sites and smartphone apps have been developed to track DFA a1 in retrospect or in real-time, making field assessment of physiologic exercise thresholds and internal load assessment practical. Although of value when viewed in isolation, DFA a1 tracking in combination with non-autonomic markers such as power/pace, open intriguing possibilities regarding athlete durability, identification of endurance exercise fatigue and optimization of daily training guidance.
虽然诸如气体交换或乳酸测试等确定生理运动阈值和强度分布的既定方法适用于实验室环境,但大多数参与者并不容易获得这些方法。过去两年的数据表明,去趋势波动分析(DFA a1)的短期标度指数α1,一种代表心跳序列分形相关特性程度的心率变异性(HRV)指数,有望成为运动负荷评估的替代方法。与传统的HRV指数不同,它在所有强度区域都具有动态范围,并且不需要通过递增运动测试进行预先校准。DFA a1值为0.75,反映了良好相关的分形模式和不相关行为之间的中间值,已被证明与精英、休闲和心脏病患者群体的有氧阈值相关,并被称为心率变异性阈值(HRVT)。分形相关特性的进一步丧失,表明随机心跳模式,意味着自主不可持续状态(DFA a1为0.5),可能与无氧阈值相关。在低于3%的水平下,常见伪迹校正方法对DFA a1的影响最小,即使在6%的水平下,HRVT的变化也可以忽略不计。DFA a1在标准强度目标可能出现偏差的情况下,如离心骑行中,对运动负荷管理也具有价值。目前,已经开发了几个网站和智能手机应用程序来回顾性或实时跟踪DFA a1,使得生理运动阈值的现场评估和内部负荷评估变得切实可行。虽然单独来看有价值,但将DFA a1跟踪与功率/配速等非自主标记相结合,为运动员耐力、耐力运动疲劳的识别以及日常训练指导的优化带来了有趣的可能性。