• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物理治疗师治疗腰痛患者的指南依从性:一项定性研究。

Guideline adherence of physiotherapists in the treatment of patients with low back pain: A qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Research & Development, Fysius Back Experts, Nijverdal, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Dec;28(6):1147-1156. doi: 10.1111/jep.13703. Epub 2022 May 26.

DOI:10.1111/jep.13703
PMID:35615965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9796459/
Abstract

RATIONALE

Adherence rates to guidelines show room for improvement, and increase in adherence to guidelines may potentially lead to better outcomes and reduced costs of treatment. To improve adherence, it is essential to understand the considerations of physiotherapists regarding the assessment and management of low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this study is to gain insight in the considerations of Dutch physiotherapists on adherence to the national physiotherapy guideline in the treatment of patients with LBP.

METHODS

This is a qualitative study, using an interpretive approach of semi-structured interviews with 14 physiotherapists who regularly treat patients with LBP. Thematic analysis was conducted with open coding using an existing framework. This framework distinguishes five components to adherence based on patient factors, provider factors, guideline characteristics, institutional factors and the implementation process.

RESULTS

Participating physiotherapists mentioned that the guideline should provide more information about psychosocial prognostic factors and psychosocial treatment options. The participants experienced difficulties in addressing patient expectations that conflict with guideline recommendations. The implementation process of the guideline was considered insufficient. Physiotherapists might rely too much on their experience, and knowledge of evidence-based treatment might be improved. In general, the interviewed physiotherapists thought they were mainly non-adherent to the guidelines. However, when comparing their considerations with the actual guideline recommendations they were mainly adherent.

CONCLUSION

To improve adherence, the guideline should provide more information about addressing psychosocial prognostic factors, and Dutch physiotherapists might be trained in communication skills to better address patient expectations. A more extensive implementation process is warranted for the next guideline to increase the physiotherapists' knowledge of evidence-based treatment.

摘要

背景

对指南的依从率显示出仍有改进的空间,而增加对指南的依从可能会带来更好的结果,并降低治疗成本。为了提高依从性,了解物理治疗师在评估和管理下腰痛(LBP)时的考虑因素至关重要。本研究的目的是深入了解荷兰物理治疗师在治疗 LBP 患者时对国家物理治疗指南依从性的考虑。

方法

这是一项定性研究,采用半结构式访谈的解释性方法,对 14 名经常治疗 LBP 患者的物理治疗师进行访谈。使用现有的框架进行主题分析,并进行开放式编码。该框架基于患者因素、提供者因素、指南特征、机构因素和实施过程,将依从性分为五个组成部分。

结果

参与的物理治疗师提到,指南应提供更多关于心理社会预后因素和心理社会治疗选择的信息。参与者在解决与指南建议相冲突的患者期望方面遇到困难。指南的实施过程被认为是不充分的。物理治疗师可能过于依赖自己的经验,并且对循证治疗的知识可能需要提高。总体而言,接受访谈的物理治疗师认为他们主要不遵守指南。然而,当将他们的考虑与实际的指南建议进行比较时,他们主要是遵守的。

结论

为了提高依从性,指南应提供更多关于处理心理社会预后因素的信息,荷兰物理治疗师可能需要接受沟通技巧的培训,以更好地满足患者的期望。下一个指南需要更广泛的实施过程,以提高物理治疗师对循证治疗的了解。

相似文献

1
Guideline adherence of physiotherapists in the treatment of patients with low back pain: A qualitative study.物理治疗师治疗腰痛患者的指南依从性:一项定性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Dec;28(6):1147-1156. doi: 10.1111/jep.13703. Epub 2022 May 26.
2
Physiotherapist- and patient-reported barriers to guideline implementation of active physiotherapeutic management of low back pain: A theory-informed qualitative study.物理治疗师和患者报告的主动物理治疗管理腰痛指南实施障碍:一项基于理论的定性研究。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2024 Oct;73:103129. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103129. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
3
Physiotherapists may stigmatise or feel unprepared to treat people with low back pain and psychosocial factors that influence recovery: a systematic review.物理治疗师可能会歧视患有腰痛的人,或者觉得没有做好治疗准备,以及那些影响康复的社会心理因素:一项系统综述。
J Physiother. 2015 Apr;61(2):68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
4
Patients' and physiotherapists' perspectives on implementing a tailored stratified treatment approach for low back pain in Nigeria: a qualitative study.患者和物理治疗师对在尼日利亚实施针对腰痛的个体化分层治疗方法的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 20;12(6):e059736. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059736.
5
Physiotherapists' views of implementing a stratified treatment approach for patients with low back pain in Germany: a qualitative study.德国物理治疗师对为腰痛患者实施分层治疗方法的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2991-3.
6
Communication style and exercise compliance in physiotherapy (CONNECT): a cluster randomized controlled trial to test a theory-based intervention to increase chronic low back pain patients' adherence to physiotherapists' recommendations: study rationale, design, and methods.沟通方式与理疗中的运动依从性(CONNECT):一项群组随机对照试验,旨在检验一项基于理论的干预措施,以提高慢性下背痛患者对理疗师建议的依从性:研究背景、设计和方法。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jun 15;13:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-104.
7
Adherence to key domains in low back pain guidelines: A cross-sectional study of Danish physiotherapists.坚持低腰背疼痛指南中的关键领域:丹麦物理治疗师的横断面研究。
Physiother Res Int. 2020 Oct;25(4):e1858. doi: 10.1002/pri.1858. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
8
Experiences, barriers and needs of physiotherapists with regard to providing self-management support to people with low back pain: A qualitative study.物理治疗师在为腰痛患者提供自我管理支持方面的经验、障碍和需求:一项定性研究。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Dec;56:102462. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102462. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
9
Feasibility of a stratified blended physiotherapy intervention for patients with non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods study.分层混合物理治疗干预非特异性下腰痛患者的可行性:一项混合方法研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Feb;38(2):286-298. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1756015. Epub 2020 May 20.
10
Evidence-Based Practice for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: Canadian Physiotherapists' Adherence, Beliefs, and Perspectives.非特异性下腰痛的循证实践:加拿大物理治疗师的依从性、信念及观点
Physiother Can. 2022 Jan 1;74(1):44-53. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0038. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Behavior Change in Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation: A Qualitative Study.理解临床实践指南实施中的行为改变:一项定性研究。
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2025 Jan 1;49(1):13-23. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000498. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Management of low back pain and lumbosacral radicular syndrome: the Guideline of the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF).腰背疼痛和腰骶神经根综合征的管理:荷兰皇家物理治疗学会(KNGF)指南。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Apr;60(2):292-318. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08352-7. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
3
The Added Value of Face-to-Face Supervision to a Therapeutic Exercise-Based App in the Management of Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.面对面监督对基于治疗性运动的应用程序在慢性下背痛患者管理中的附加价值:一项随机临床试验。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 16;24(2):567. doi: 10.3390/s24020567.
4
How do non-specific back pain patients think about their adherence to physiotherapy, and what strategies do physiotherapists use to facilitate adherence? A focus group interview study.非特异性背痛患者如何看待他们对物理治疗的依从性,以及物理治疗师采用哪些策略来促进依从性?一项焦点小组访谈研究。
J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Apr;32(2):150-158. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2258699. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
5
Which aspects facilitate the adherence of patients with low back pain to physiotherapy? A Delphi study.哪些方面有助于腰痛患者坚持物理治疗?一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jul 27;24(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06724-z.
6
Barriers, facilitators and implementation strategies for guideline-adherence in physiotherapy: a scoping review protocol.物理治疗中遵循指南的障碍、促进因素和实施策略:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e074640. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074640.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of low back pain and lumbosacral radicular syndrome: the Guideline of the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF).腰背疼痛和腰骶神经根综合征的管理:荷兰皇家物理治疗学会(KNGF)指南。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Apr;60(2):292-318. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08352-7. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
Research Note: Thematic analysis in qualitative research.研究笔记:定性研究中的主题分析。
J Physiother. 2022 Jan;68(1):76-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
3
Physical therapy for patients with low back pain in Germany: a survey of current practice.德国腰痛患者的物理治疗:当前实践调查。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 19;22(1):563. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04422-2.
4
Lack of Consensus Across Clinical Guidelines Regarding the Role of Psychosocial Factors Within Low Back Pain Care: A Systematic Review.临床指南在心理社会因素于腰痛治疗中的作用方面缺乏共识:系统评价。
J Pain. 2021 Dec;22(12):1545-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 May 23.
5
Concordance of patient beliefs and expectations regarding the management of low back pain with guideline recommendations - a cross-sectional study in Germany.患者对腰痛管理的信念和期望与指南推荐的一致性 - 德国的一项横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 21;21(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01352-1.
6
Letter to the Editor: Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for low back pain from a Dutch perspective.致编辑的信:从荷兰视角看对腰痛临床实践指南的遵循情况。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Jan;37(1):1-5. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1858933. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
7
Adherence to key domains in low back pain guidelines: A cross-sectional study of Danish physiotherapists.坚持低腰背疼痛指南中的关键领域:丹麦物理治疗师的横断面研究。
Physiother Res Int. 2020 Oct;25(4):e1858. doi: 10.1002/pri.1858. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
8
Confidence, attitudes, beliefs and determinants of implementation behaviours among physiotherapists towards clinical management of low back pain before and after implementation of the BetterBack model of care.在实施 BetterBack 护理模式前后,物理治疗师在管理下腰痛方面的实施行为的信心、态度、信念和决定因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 19;20(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05197-3.
9
Sampling Methods in Research Design.研究设计中的抽样方法。
Headache. 2020 Jan;60(1):8-12. doi: 10.1111/head.13707.
10
Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 5: Osteoarthritis.慢性疼痛的最佳证据康复治疗 第5部分:骨关节炎
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 24;8(11):1769. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111769.