• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估与肩痛相关的智能手机应用程序的质量:使用移动应用程序评分量表进行系统检索和评估。

Rating the Quality of Smartphone Apps Related to Shoulder Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale.

作者信息

Agnew Jonathon M R, Nugent Chris, Hanratty Catherine E, Martin Elizabeth, Kerr Daniel P, McVeigh Joseph G

机构信息

Discipline in Physiotherapy, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom.

Discipline in Computing, School of Computing, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 26;6(5):e34339. doi: 10.2196/34339.

DOI:10.2196/34339
PMID:35617008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9185331/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The successful rehabilitation of musculoskeletal pain requires more than medical input alone. Conservative treatment, including physiotherapy and exercise therapy, can be an effective way of decreasing pain associated with musculoskeletal pain. However, face-to-face appointments are currently not feasible. New mobile technologies, such as mobile health technologies in the form of an app for smartphones, can be a solution to this problem. In many cases, these apps are not backed by scientific literature. Therefore, it is important that they are reviewed and quality assessed.

OBJECTIVE

The aim is to evaluate and measure the quality of apps related to shoulder pain by using the Mobile App Rating Scale.

METHODS

This study included 25 free and paid apps-8 from the Apple Store and 17 from the Google Play Store. A total of 5 reviewers were involved in the evaluation process. A descriptive analysis of the Mobile App Rating Scale results provided a general overview of the quality of the apps.

RESULTS

Overall, app quality was generally low, with an average star rating of 1.97 out of 5. The best scores were in the "Functionality" and "Aesthetics" sections, and apps were scored poorer in the "Engagement" and "Information" sections. The apps were also rated poorly in the "Subjective Quality" section.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, the apps were well built technically and were aesthetically pleasing. However, the apps failed to provide quality information to users, which resulted in a lack of engagement. Most of the apps were not backed by scientific literature (24/25, 96%), and those that contained scientific references were vastly out-of-date. Future apps would need to address these concerns while taking simple measures to ensure quality control.

摘要

背景

肌肉骨骼疼痛的成功康复需要的不仅仅是单纯的医学投入。保守治疗,包括物理治疗和运动疗法,可能是减轻与肌肉骨骼疼痛相关疼痛的有效方法。然而,目前面对面预约并不可行。新的移动技术,如智能手机应用程序形式的移动健康技术,可能是解决这个问题的办法。在许多情况下,这些应用程序没有科学文献支持。因此,对它们进行审查和质量评估很重要。

目的

旨在使用移动应用程序评分量表评估和衡量与肩痛相关的应用程序的质量。

方法

本研究纳入了25个免费和付费应用程序——8个来自苹果应用商店,17个来自谷歌应用商店。共有5名评审员参与评估过程。对移动应用程序评分量表结果的描述性分析提供了应用程序质量的总体概述。

结果

总体而言,应用程序质量普遍较低,平均星级为1.97(满分5星)。得分最高的是“功能”和“美学”部分,而应用程序在“参与度”和“信息”部分得分较低。这些应用程序在“主观质量”部分的评分也很低。

结论

一般来说,这些应用程序在技术上构建良好,外观也令人愉悦。然而,这些应用程序未能向用户提供高质量信息,导致用户参与度不足。大多数应用程序没有科学文献支持(24/25,96%),那些包含科学参考文献的应用程序也严重过时。未来的应用程序需要在采取简单措施确保质量控制的同时解决这些问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0225/9185331/4fe9b6716b15/formative_v6i5e34339_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0225/9185331/06ca21f73b98/formative_v6i5e34339_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0225/9185331/42a30fd95e82/formative_v6i5e34339_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0225/9185331/0da77b36c22f/formative_v6i5e34339_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0225/9185331/d4f9465234ad/formative_v6i5e34339_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0225/9185331/4fe9b6716b15/formative_v6i5e34339_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0225/9185331/06ca21f73b98/formative_v6i5e34339_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0225/9185331/42a30fd95e82/formative_v6i5e34339_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0225/9185331/0da77b36c22f/formative_v6i5e34339_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0225/9185331/d4f9465234ad/formative_v6i5e34339_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0225/9185331/4fe9b6716b15/formative_v6i5e34339_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Rating the Quality of Smartphone Apps Related to Shoulder Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale.评估与肩痛相关的智能手机应用程序的质量:使用移动应用程序评分量表进行系统检索和评估。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 26;6(5):e34339. doi: 10.2196/34339.
2
Mobile Phone Apps for Food Allergies or Intolerances in App Stores: Systematic Search and Quality Assessment Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).应用商店中针对食物过敏或不耐受的手机应用程序:使用移动应用评级量表(MARS)进行系统搜索和质量评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):e18339. doi: 10.2196/18339.
3
Measuring the Quality of Mobile Apps for the Management of Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale.评估用于疼痛管理的移动应用程序的质量:使用移动应用程序评分量表进行系统检索和评估
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Oct 25;6(10):e10718. doi: 10.2196/10718.
4
Popular Evidence-Based Commercial Mental Health Apps: Analysis of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information Quality.流行的循证商业心理健康应用程序:参与度、功能、美学和信息质量分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 14;9(7):e29689. doi: 10.2196/29689.
5
Nutrition-Related Mobile Apps in the Spanish App Stores: Quality and Content Analysis.营养相关的移动应用程序在西班牙的应用商店:质量和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Oct 4;12:e52424. doi: 10.2196/52424.
6
Mental Health Mobile Apps in the French App Store: Assessment Study of Functionality and Quality.法国应用商店中的心理健康移动应用程序:功能和质量评估研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Oct 12;10(10):e41282. doi: 10.2196/41282.
7
Quality, Features, and Presence of Behavior Change Techniques in Mobile Apps Designed to Improve Physical Activity in Pregnant Women: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.旨在改善孕妇身体活动的移动应用程序中行为改变技术的质量、特征和存在:系统搜索和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 7;9(4):e23649. doi: 10.2196/23649.
8
Quality of Mobile Apps for Care Partners of People With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Mobile App Rating Scale Evaluation.用于阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆患者护理者的移动应用程序质量:移动应用程序评级量表评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Mar 29;10(3):e33863. doi: 10.2196/33863.
9
German Mobile Apps for Patients With Psoriasis: Systematic Search and Evaluation.德国面向银屑病患者的移动应用程序:系统检索与评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 26;10(5):e34017. doi: 10.2196/34017.
10
Availability, Quality, and Evidence-Based Content of mHealth Apps for the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain in the German Language: Systematic Assessment.德语文本中用于治疗非特异性下腰痛的移动医疗应用程序的可用性、质量和基于证据的内容:系统评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Sep 13;11:e47502. doi: 10.2196/47502.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of frameworks evaluating digital health applications.一项关于评估数字健康应用程序的框架的范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;11:20552076251315297. doi: 10.1177/20552076251315297. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Content and Quality of Mobile Apps for the Monitoring of Musculoskeletal or Neuropathic Pain in Australia: Systematic Evaluation.澳大利亚用于监测肌肉骨骼或神经性疼痛的移动应用程序的内容和质量:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Sep 13;11:e46881. doi: 10.2196/46881.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).移动应用评定量表(MARS)的验证。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 2;15(11):e0241480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241480. eCollection 2020.
2
Improved readability and functions needed for mHealth apps targeting patients with heart failure: An app store review.改善针对心力衰竭患者的移动医疗应用程序的可读性和功能:应用商店评价。
Res Nurs Health. 2021 Feb;44(1):71-80. doi: 10.1002/nur.22078. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
3
Systematic evaluation of commercially available pain management apps examining behavior change techniques.
系统评估市售的疼痛管理应用程序,考察行为改变技术。
Pain. 2021 Mar 1;162(3):856-865. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002090.
4
Scapular movement training versus standardized exercises for individuals with chronic shoulder pain: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.肩胛运动训练与慢性肩痛患者标准化运动治疗的随机对照试验方案。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Mar-Apr;25(2):221-229. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
5
Effectiveness of progressive and resisted and non-progressive or non-resisted exercise in rotator cuff related shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.渐进性和抗阻性与非渐进性或非抗阻性运动治疗肩袖相关肩痛的有效性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Rehabil. 2020 Sep;34(9):1198-1216. doi: 10.1177/0269215520934147. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
6
Diagnosing COVID-19: The Disease and Tools for Detection.诊断 COVID-19:疾病与检测工具。
ACS Nano. 2020 Apr 28;14(4):3822-3835. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c02624. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
7
The Role of Telehealth in Reducing the Mental Health Burden from COVID-19.远程医疗在减轻新冠疫情所致心理健康负担方面的作用
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Apr;26(4):377-379. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0068. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
8
Shoulder pain prevalence and risk factors in middle-aged women: A cross-sectional study.中年女性肩部疼痛的患病率及危险因素:一项横断面研究。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Oct;23(4):752-757. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 14.
9
An Update of Systematic Reviews Examining the Effectiveness of Conservative Physical Therapy Interventions for Subacromial Shoulder Pain.系统评价更新:保守物理治疗干预对肩峰下疼痛的有效性。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Mar;50(3):131-141. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.8498. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
10
Impact of wearable physical activity monitoring devices with exercise prescription or advice in the maintenance phase of cardiac rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis.可穿戴身体活动监测设备结合运动处方或建议在心脏康复维持阶段的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2019 Jul 30;11:14. doi: 10.1186/s13102-019-0126-8. eCollection 2019.