• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于评估数字健康应用程序的框架的范围综述。

A scoping review of frameworks evaluating digital health applications.

作者信息

Deegan Orla, Riain Eoghan O, Martin Denis, Yoshitani Mai, O'Donoghue Mairead, Smart Keith, McMahon Sinead, O'Sullivan Trish, O'Sullivan Declan J, Cole Aaron, Hanrahan Ciara, Blake Catherine, McVeigh Joseph G, Fullen Brona M, Murphy David

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, QU Health Sector, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.

School of Computer Science & Information Technology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;11:20552076251315297. doi: 10.1177/20552076251315297. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076251315297
PMID:40842934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12365444/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Despite rapid technological advances, the adoption and deployment of digital health and virtual reality (VR) applications in healthcare appears to be progressing slowly. This scoping review is part of the Scale-Up4Rehab (SU4R) project, which aims to create a virtual rehabilitation clinic hosting high-quality digital health interventions. The aim of this review was to identify existing high-quality digital health evaluation frameworks, and from these, extract criteria to inform a new set of guidelines for assessing the applications that will be hosted on the SU4R platform.

METHODS

The review followed Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework and was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search strategy that included relevant keywords encompassing the domains of interest; digital health, evaluation frameworks and digital health applications was created between January 2007 and December 2023, across seven medical and computer science databases. Data from each study were extracted by a team of four reviewers using a customized data extraction tool.

RESULTS

The review included 18 frameworks from 11 countries, incorporating 775 criteria. Nine evaluation frameworks were identified from the included papers (n = 12) and a further nine frameworks from grey literature. The criteria were grouped into 19 categories, with the largest proportion of identified criteria grouped into the categories 'Data Security and Privacy' and 'Validation'.

CONCLUSION

The criteria extracted from the reviewed frameworks will contribute to the creation of a comprehensive evaluation framework. This new evaluation framework will form part of the approval process for the SU4R Virtual Rehabilitation Clinic. This will facilitate a rigorous selection process for the digital health and VR applications to be hosted on the virtual clinic.

摘要

目标

尽管技术进步迅速,但数字健康和虚拟现实(VR)应用在医疗保健领域的采用和部署似乎进展缓慢。本范围综述是扩大康复规模(SU4R)项目的一部分,该项目旨在创建一个提供高质量数字健康干预措施的虚拟康复诊所。本综述的目的是识别现有的高质量数字健康评估框架,并从中提取标准,为评估将在SU4R平台上托管的应用程序的一套新指南提供参考。

方法

本综述遵循了阿克西和奥马利的范围综述框架,并根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行报告。在2007年1月至2023年12月期间,在七个医学和计算机科学数据库中创建了一个搜索策略,其中包括涵盖感兴趣领域的相关关键词;数字健康、评估框架和数字健康应用。由四名评审员组成的团队使用定制的数据提取工具从每项研究中提取数据。

结果

该综述纳入了来自11个国家的18个框架,包含775条标准。从纳入的论文(n = 12)中识别出九个评估框架,从灰色文献中又识别出另外九个框架。这些标准被分为19类,其中识别出的标准中最大比例被归入“数据安全和隐私”以及“验证”类别。

结论

从审查的框架中提取的标准将有助于创建一个全面的评估框架。这个新的评估框架将成为SU4R虚拟康复诊所审批流程的一部分。这将有助于对虚拟诊所中托管的数字健康和VR应用进行严格的筛选过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/234c/12365444/d7b1262389fb/10.1177_20552076251315297-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/234c/12365444/7de912ad86ee/10.1177_20552076251315297-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/234c/12365444/d7b1262389fb/10.1177_20552076251315297-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/234c/12365444/7de912ad86ee/10.1177_20552076251315297-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/234c/12365444/d7b1262389fb/10.1177_20552076251315297-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
A scoping review of frameworks evaluating digital health applications.一项关于评估数字健康应用程序的框架的范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;11:20552076251315297. doi: 10.1177/20552076251315297. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Methodological Frameworks and Dimensions to Be Considered in Digital Health Technology Assessment: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis.数字健康技术评估中需要考虑的方法学框架和维度:范围综述和主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 10;26:e48694. doi: 10.2196/48694.
4
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.妇科癌症患者接受专科护士护理的体验:一项定性系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.
5
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
8
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
9
The effectiveness of using non-traditional teaching methods to prepare student health care professionals for the delivery of mental state examination: a systematic review.使用非传统教学方法培养学生医护专业人员进行精神状态检查的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Aug 14;13(7):177-212. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2263.
10
Mental health interventions for humanitarian volunteers: a scoping review.针对人道主义志愿者的心理健康干预措施:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 6;15(7):e095363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095363.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic HTA for digital health solutions: opportunities and challenges for patient-centered evaluation.动态卫生技术评估在数字健康解决方案中的应用:以患者为中心的评估的机遇与挑战。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Nov 17;39(1):e72. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002726.
2
Development of a Core Set of Quality Criteria for Virtual Reality Applications Designed for Older Adults: Multistep Qualitative Study.为老年人设计的虚拟现实应用质量标准核心集的制定:多步骤定性研究
Interact J Med Res. 2023 Sep 27;12:e45433. doi: 10.2196/45433.
3
Scope, Characteristics, Behavior Change Techniques, and Quality of Conversational Agents for Mental Health and Well-Being: Systematic Assessment of Apps.
用于心理健康和福祉的对话代理的范围、特征、行为改变技术和质量:应用程序的系统评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 18;25:e45984. doi: 10.2196/45984.
4
Continuity and care coordination of primary health care: a scoping review.初级卫生保健的连续性和护理协调:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):750. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09718-8.
5
Implementation of virtual reality in healthcare: a scoping review on the implementation process of virtual reality in various healthcare settings.虚拟现实在医疗保健中的应用:关于虚拟现实在各种医疗环境中实施过程的范围综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jun 16;4(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00442-2.
6
Benefits, challenges and sustainability of digital healthcare for NHS Wales: a qualitative study.英国国民保健制度(NHS)威尔士地区数字医疗的获益、挑战和可持续性:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 29;13(5):e069371. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069371.
7
Quality, Usability, and Effectiveness of mHealth Apps and the Role of Artificial Intelligence: Current Scenario and Challenges.移动医疗应用程序的质量、可用性和有效性以及人工智能的作用:现状与挑战。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 4;25:e44030. doi: 10.2196/44030.
8
Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Exercise on Balance in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.虚拟现实锻炼对脑卒中患者平衡能力的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Apr 1;102(4):316-322. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002096. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
9
Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews.综述的提取、分析和结果呈现建议。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Mar 1;21(3):520-532. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00123.
10
Application of Virtual Reality Technology in Clinical Practice, Teaching, and Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine.虚拟现实技术在补充和替代医学临床实践、教学及研究中的应用
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Aug 11;2022:1373170. doi: 10.1155/2022/1373170. eCollection 2022.