• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童青少年行为量表的症状评定在母亲、父亲和教师评定西班牙儿童时的一致性和来源特异性。

Consistency and source specificity of symptom ratings for Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory Scales with mother, father, and teacher ratings of Spanish children.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

QuantFish, LLC.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2022 Sep;34(9):827-837. doi: 10.1037/pas0001148. Epub 2022 May 26.

DOI:10.1037/pas0001148
PMID:35617243
Abstract

The study determined consistency relative to a reference source (convergent validity for nonreference sources with a reference source) and specificity for nonreference sources in true score variance in (CABI) ADHD-inattentive (IN), ADHD-hyperactive/impulsive (HI), sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), limited prosocial emotions (LPE), depression, anxiety, academic impairment, and social impairment scale scores. A multiple indicator by single trait by correlated (methods-1) model with indicator-specific trait factors was used to evaluate CABI scale scores with mother, father, and teacher ratings of 2,142 Spanish children (49.49% girls; ages 8-13). Mother ratings served as the reference source with father and teacher ratings serving as nonreference sources. Father with mother ratings showed substantial convergent correlations for each CABI scale (.73 to .90). Teacher with mother ratings showed a substantial convergent correlation for academic impairment (.72), strong convergent correlations for ADHD-IN (.57), ADHD-HI (.46), SCT (.52), and depression (.46), and small-to-moderate convergent correlations for ODD (.33), LPE (.24), and anxiety (.22) scales. Source independent and context-specific measures with appropriate content validity for home and school settings are required to better understand the greater variability in consistency from teacher to mother ratings. These results provide new information for the use of the CABI with multiple sources. In addition, the study indicates how a multiple indicator by single trait by correlated (methods-1) model with indicator-specific trait factors can be used to better understand multiple source ratings of child and adolescent psychopathology and adjustment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

该研究确定了与参考源(非参考源与参考源的聚合效度)的一致性以及真分数方差中(CABI)注意力缺陷多动障碍(IN)、注意力缺陷多动障碍(HI)、认知动力迟缓(SCT)、对立违抗性障碍(ODD)、有限亲社会情绪(LPE)、抑郁、焦虑、学业障碍和社会障碍量表评分的特异性。使用多指标单特质相关(方法 1)模型,带有指标特定特质因素,评估了 2142 名西班牙儿童(49.49%女孩;年龄 8-13 岁)的母亲、父亲和教师对 CABI 量表的评分。母亲评分作为参考源,父亲和教师评分作为非参考源。母亲与父亲评分对每个 CABI 量表均显示出较大的聚合相关性(.73 至.90)。教师与母亲评分对学业障碍(.72)具有较强的聚合相关性,对 ADHD-IN(.57)、ADHD-HI(.46)、SCT(.52)和抑郁(.46)具有较强的聚合相关性,对 ODD(.33)、LPE(.24)和焦虑(.22)具有较小至中等的聚合相关性。需要具有适当内容效度的家庭和学校环境中的独立来源和特定情境的测量,以更好地理解教师对母亲评分的一致性的更大变异性。这些结果为使用多来源的 CABI 提供了新信息。此外,该研究表明,具有指标特定特质因素的多指标单特质相关(方法 1)模型如何更好地理解儿童和青少年心理病理学和适应的多源评分。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Consistency and source specificity of symptom ratings for Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory Scales with mother, father, and teacher ratings of Spanish children.儿童青少年行为量表的症状评定在母亲、父亲和教师评定西班牙儿童时的一致性和来源特异性。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Sep;34(9):827-837. doi: 10.1037/pas0001148. Epub 2022 May 26.
2
Optimal Items for Assessing Sluggish Cognitive Tempo in Children Across Mother, Father, and Teacher Ratings.评估儿童认知迟钝的最佳项目:来自母亲、父亲和教师的评价。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Nov-Dec;48(6):825-839. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1416619. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
3
Sluggish cognitive tempo and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) inattention in the home and school contexts: Parent and teacher invariance and cross-setting validity.家庭和学校环境中认知节奏迟缓与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的注意力不集中:家长和教师的一致性及跨环境效度
Psychol Assess. 2017 Feb;29(2):209-220. doi: 10.1037/pas0000325. Epub 2016 May 5.
4
Evaluation of a four-item DSM-5 Limited Prosocial Emotions specifier scale within and across settings with Spanish children.在不同情境下使用西班牙语儿童评估 DSM-5 有限亲社会情感特定标准量表的四项条目。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Apr;30(4):474-485. doi: 10.1037/pas0000496. Epub 2017 May 8.
5
Application of the Bifactor S - 1 Model to Multisource Ratings of ADHD/ODD Symptoms: an Appropriate Bifactor Model for Symptom Ratings.双因素 S-1 模型在 ADHD/ODD 症状多源评定中的应用:症状评定的适宜双因素模型。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Jul;48(7):881-894. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00608-4.
6
Oppositional Defiant Disorder in the DSM-5: Does the Limited Prosocial Emotions Specifier Portend a More Severe Clinical Presentation?DSM-5 中的对立违抗性障碍:有限的亲社会情绪特征预示着更严重的临床症状吗?
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2023 Jul;51(7):1037-1050. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01052-1. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
7
Bifactor latent structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)/oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms and first-order latent structure of sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms.注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)/对立违抗性障碍(ODD)症状的双因素潜在结构及认知迟缓症状的一阶潜在结构。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Aug;28(8):917-28. doi: 10.1037/pas0000232. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
8
Advancing the Multi-Informant Assessment of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Child Self-Report in Relation to Parent and Teacher Ratings of SCT and Impairment.推进 sluggish cognitive tempo 的多 informant 评估:儿童自我报告与父母和教师对 SCT 和障碍的评定的关系。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Jan;47(1):35-46. doi: 10.1007/s10802-018-0436-4.
9
Agreement between mother, father, and teacher ratings of cognitive disengagement syndrome (sluggish cognitive tempo) in children with autism and children with ADHD.自闭症儿童和 ADHD 儿童的母亲、父亲和教师对认知脱离综合征(迟钝认知节奏)的评定之间的一致性。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Jul;35(7):582-588. doi: 10.1037/pas0001234. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
10
Sluggish Cognitive Tempo among Iranian Children and Adolescents: A Validation Study of the Farsi Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory (CABI)-Parent Version.伊朗儿童和青少年的认知节奏迟缓:法尔斯语儿童和青少年行为量表(CABI)家长版的效度研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 27;11(21):6346. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216346.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Rated Symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in a Clinical Sample of Adolescents.对立违抗障碍和品行障碍的自评症状:青少年临床样本中的因子结构、信度和效度
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Dec 11. doi: 10.1007/s10578-024-01802-2.
2
Oppositional Defiant Disorder in the DSM-5: Does the Limited Prosocial Emotions Specifier Portend a More Severe Clinical Presentation?DSM-5 中的对立违抗性障碍:有限的亲社会情绪特征预示着更严重的临床症状吗?
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2023 Jul;51(7):1037-1050. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01052-1. Epub 2023 Mar 22.