• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对立违抗障碍和品行障碍的自评症状:青少年临床样本中的因子结构、信度和效度

Self-Rated Symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in a Clinical Sample of Adolescents.

作者信息

Klos Simon, Thöne Ann-Kathrin, Döpfner Manfred, Görtz-Dorten Anja

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, School for Child and Adolescent Cognitive Behavior Therapy (AKiP), University of Cologne, Pohligstr. 9, 50969, Cologne, Germany.

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 10, 50931, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Dec 11. doi: 10.1007/s10578-024-01802-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10578-024-01802-2
PMID:39661291
Abstract

This study examined the psychometric properties of self-rated symptoms of oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD). We analyzed symptom ratings from a clinical outpatient sample of 658 adolescents aged 11;0-17;11 years diagnosed with ODD/CD and/or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. In two steps, we examined the factor structure of ODD models and an additional CD symptom dimension using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). Our preferred three-factor CFA and ESEM models (CFI = 0.937-0.975, TLI = 0.926-0.962, RMSEA = 0.049-0.068, SRMR = 0.045-0.070) demonstrated scalar measurement invariance across age groups (≥ 14;0 years) and metric measurement invariance across informants (parents, teachers). With exceptions, the self-rated symptom scales showed acceptable internal consistencies (α = 0.68-0.84). Convergent (r =.27-.65) and divergent validity (r =.13-.41) were supported using Achenbach's Youth Self Report Form. Our results provide implications for using self-rated ODD/CD symptoms in clinical practice and research.

摘要

本研究考察了对立违抗性障碍(ODD)和品行障碍(CD)自评症状的心理测量特性。我们分析了来自658名年龄在11岁0个月至17岁11个月的临床门诊青少年样本的症状评分,这些青少年被诊断患有ODD/CD和/或注意力缺陷多动障碍。我们分两步,使用验证性因素分析(CFA)和探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)来考察ODD模型的因素结构以及一个额外的CD症状维度。我们首选的三因素CFA和ESEM模型(CFI = 0.937 - 0.975,TLI = 0.926 - 0.962,RMSEA = 0.049 - 0.068,SRMR = 0.045 - 0.070)在各年龄组(≥14岁0个月)间显示出标量测量不变性,在不同信息提供者(父母、教师)间显示出度量测量不变性。除个别情况外,自评症状量表显示出可接受的内部一致性(α = 0.68 - 0.84)。使用阿肯巴克儿童行为量表青少年自评表支持了聚合效度(r = 0.27 - 0.65)和区分效度(r = 0.13 - 0.41)。我们的结果为在临床实践和研究中使用ODD/CD自评症状提供了启示。

相似文献

1
Self-Rated Symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in a Clinical Sample of Adolescents.对立违抗障碍和品行障碍的自评症状:青少年临床样本中的因子结构、信度和效度
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Dec 11. doi: 10.1007/s10578-024-01802-2.
2
The pharmacological management of oppositional behaviour, conduct problems, and aggression in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Part 1: psychostimulants, alpha-2 agonists, and atomoxetine.注意缺陷多动障碍、对立违抗障碍和品行障碍患儿及青少年对立行为、品行问题和攻击行为的药物治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析。第1部分:精神兴奋剂、α-2激动剂和托莫西汀
Can J Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;60(2):42-51. doi: 10.1177/070674371506000202.
3
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Neuroimaging in Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) and Conduct Disorder (CD) Taking Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Into Account.一项针对对立违抗障碍(ODD)和品行障碍(CD)的神经影像学研究的系统评价与荟萃分析,并考虑注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)因素。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2016 Mar;26(1):44-72. doi: 10.1007/s11065-015-9315-8. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
4
The pharmacological management of oppositional behaviour, conduct problems, and aggression in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Part 2: antipsychotics and traditional mood stabilizers.注意缺陷多动障碍、对立违抗障碍和品行障碍患儿及青少年对立行为、品行问题和攻击行为的药物治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。第2部分:抗精神病药和传统心境稳定剂
Can J Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;60(2):52-61. doi: 10.1177/070674371506000203.
5
Reliability and validity of teacher-rated symptoms of oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder in a clinical sample.临床样本中教师评定的对立违抗性障碍和品行障碍症状的信度与效度
Psychopathology. 2014;47(5):312-8. doi: 10.1159/000362373. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
6
Atypical antipsychotics for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths.用于儿童和青少年破坏性行为障碍的非典型抗精神病药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD008559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008559.pub2.
7
Psychometric validation and measurement invariance of the self-compassion scale-short form (SCS-SF) across gender, clinical population, and cultures.自我同情量表简版(SCS-SF)在性别、临床人群和不同文化间的心理测量学验证及测量不变性
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03070-8.
8
Bidirectional relation of self-regulation with oppositional defiant disorder symptom networks and moderating role of gender.自我调节与对立违抗障碍症状网络的双向关系及性别的调节作用。
Dev Psychopathol. 2025 Aug;37(3):1616-1627. doi: 10.1017/S095457942400172X. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
9
Internal validity of the disruptive behavior disorder symptoms: implications from parent ratings for a dimensional approach to symptom validity.破坏性行为障碍症状的内部效度:父母评定对症状效度维度方法的启示
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1997 Aug;25(4):307-19. doi: 10.1023/a:1025764403506.
10
Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.用于治疗自闭症谱系障碍儿童和青少年的哌醋甲酯
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 21;11(11):CD011144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011144.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic Integration of Multi-Informant Externalizing Ratings in Clinical Settings.系统整合临床环境下多来源外化评定信息。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 Apr;52(4):635-644. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01119-z. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
2
Editorial Statement About 's 2023 Special Issue on Informant Discrepancies in Youth Mental Health Assessments: Observations, Guidelines, and Future Directions Grounded in 60 Years of Research.关于《青少年心理健康评估中信息提供者差异:基于60年研究的观察、指南及未来方向》的2023年特刊的编辑声明。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2023 Jan-Feb;52(1):147-158. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2158842. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
3
Dimensionality of Oppositional Defiant Disorder Symptoms Across Elementary-School Grades.
对立违抗障碍症状在小学各年级的维度。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Aug;55(4):1103-1114. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01474-w. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
4
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale, DSM-5 Version-Parent Form.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版韩国版破坏性行为障碍评定量表家长版的信效度
Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Nov;19(11):884-897. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0112. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
5
Conceptual, methodological, and measurement factors that disqualify use of measurement invariance techniques to detect informant discrepancies in youth mental health assessments.在青少年心理健康评估中,使测量不变性技术无法用于检测信息提供者差异的概念、方法和测量因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 2;13:931296. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.931296. eCollection 2022.
6
The conduct and oppositional defiant disorder scales (CODDS) for disruptive behaviour disorders.破坏性行为障碍的行为和对立违抗性障碍量表(CODDS)。
Psychiatry Res. 2022 Oct;316:114744. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114744. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
7
Consistency and source specificity of symptom ratings for Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory Scales with mother, father, and teacher ratings of Spanish children.儿童青少年行为量表的症状评定在母亲、父亲和教师评定西班牙儿童时的一致性和来源特异性。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Sep;34(9):827-837. doi: 10.1037/pas0001148. Epub 2022 May 26.
8
Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: Practical Guidelines and Tutorial With a Convenient Online Tool for Mplus.探索性结构方程建模:实用指南及使用Mplus便捷在线工具的教程
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 7;12:795672. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.795672. eCollection 2021.
9
Disentangling symptoms of externalizing disorders in children using multiple measures and informants.使用多种测量工具和信息来源厘清儿童外化障碍的症状。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Nov;33(11):1065-1079. doi: 10.1037/pas0001053. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
10
Developing and Validating Clinical Questionnaires.开发和验证临床调查问卷。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021 May 7;17:55-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-115343. Epub 2021 Feb 9.