School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Ireland.
PLoS One. 2022 May 26;17(5):e0269117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269117. eCollection 2022.
There is encouraging evidence that interdisciplinary teams of Health and Social Care Professionals (HSCPs) can enhance patient care in the Emergency Department (ED), especially for older adults with complex needs. However, no formal process evaluations of implementations of ED-based HSCP interventions are available. The study aimed to evaluate the development and delivery of a HSCP team intervention for older adults in the ED of a large Irish teaching hospital.
Using the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework for process evaluations, we investigated implementation and delivery, mechanisms of impact, and contextual influences on implementation by analysing the HSCP team's activity notes and participant recruitment logs, and by carrying out six interviews and four focus groups with 26 participants (HSCP team members, ED doctors and nurses, hospital staff). Qualitative insights were analysed thematically.
The implementation process had three phases (pre-implementation, piloting, and delivery), with the first two described as pivotal to optimise care procedures and build positive stakeholders' involvement. The team's motivation and proactive communication were key to promote acceptability and integration in the ED (Theme 1); also, their specialised skills and interdisciplinary approach enhanced patient and staff's ED experience (Theme 2). The investment and collaboration of multiple stakeholders were described as essential contextual enablers of implementation (Theme 4). Delivering the intervention within a randomised controlled trial fostered credibility but caused frustration among patients and staff (Theme 3).
This process evaluation is the first to provide in-depth and practical insights on the complexities of developing and delivering an ED-based HSCP team intervention for older adults. Our findings highlight the importance of establishing a team of HSCPs with a strong interdisciplinary ethos to ensure buy-in and integration in the ED processes. Also, actively involving relevant stakeholders is key to facilitate implementation.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03739515; registered on 12th November 2018.
有令人鼓舞的证据表明,医疗和社会保健专业人员(HSCPs)的跨学科团队可以增强急诊科(ED)的患者护理,特别是对于有复杂需求的老年人。然而,目前尚无关于 ED 基于 HSCP 干预措施实施的正式过程评估。本研究旨在评估为爱尔兰一所大型教学医院 ED 中的老年人实施 HSCP 团队干预措施的发展和实施情况。
我们使用医疗研究委员会(MRC)的过程评估框架,通过分析 HSCP 团队的活动记录和参与者招募记录,并通过对 26 名参与者(HSCP 团队成员、ED 医生和护士、医院工作人员)进行六次访谈和四次焦点小组,调查实施和交付情况、影响机制以及对实施的背景影响。对定性见解进行了主题分析。
实施过程有三个阶段(实施前、试点和交付),前两个阶段被描述为优化护理程序和建立积极的利益相关者参与的关键。团队的积极性和积极的沟通是促进 ED 可接受性和整合的关键(主题 1);此外,他们的专业技能和跨学科方法增强了患者和工作人员在 ED 的体验(主题 2)。多个利益相关者的投资和合作被描述为实施的重要背景促进因素(主题 4)。在随机对照试验中实施干预措施提高了可信度,但给患者和工作人员带来了挫折感(主题 3)。
这是第一个提供有关为老年人开发和提供基于 ED 的 HSCP 团队干预措施的复杂性的深入和实用见解的过程评估。我们的研究结果强调了建立具有强烈跨学科精神的 HSCP 团队的重要性,以确保 ED 流程中的参与和整合。此外,积极参与相关利益相关者是促进实施的关键。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03739515;于 2018 年 11 月 12 日注册。