• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科健康与社会护理专业团队的评估与干预对老年人护理质量、安全性及临床有效性的影响:一项随机对照试验

Impact of assessment and intervention by a health and social care professional team in the emergency department on the quality, safety, and clinical effectiveness of care for older adults: A randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Cassarino Marica, Robinson Katie, Trépel Dominic, O'Shaughnessy Íde, Smalle Eimear, White Stephen, Devlin Collette, Quinn Rosie, Boland Fiona, Ward Marie E, McNamara Rosa, Steed Fiona, O'Connor Margaret, O'Regan Andrew, McCarthy Gerard, Ryan Damien, Galvin Rose

机构信息

School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Health Research Institute, Ageing Research Centre, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Ireland.

School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2021 Jul 28;18(7):e1003711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003711. eCollection 2021 Jul.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003711
PMID:34319971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8318294/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults frequently attend the emergency department (ED) and experience high rates of adverse events following ED presentation. This randomised controlled trial evaluated the impact of early assessment and intervention by a dedicated team of health and social care professionals (HSCPs) in the ED on the quality, safety, and clinical effectiveness of care of older adults in the ED.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This single-site randomised controlled trial included a sample of 353 patients aged ≥65 years (mean age = 79.6, SD = 7.01; 59.2% female) who presented with lower urgency complaints to the ED a university hospital in the Mid-West region of Ireland, during HSCP operational hours. The intervention consisted of early assessment and intervention carried out by a HSCP team comprising a senior medical social worker, senior occupational therapist, and senior physiotherapist. The primary outcome was ED length of stay. Secondary outcomes included rates of hospital admissions from the ED; hospital length of stay for admitted patients; patient satisfaction with index visit; ED revisits, mortality, nursing home admission, and unscheduled hospital admission at 30-day and 6-month follow-up; and patient functional status and quality of life (at index visit and follow-up). Demographic information included the patient's gender, age, marital status, residential status, mode of arrival to the ED, source of referral, index complaint, triage category, falls, and hospitalisation history. Participants in the intervention group (n = 176) experienced a significantly shorter ED stay than the control group (n = 177) (6.4 versus 12.1 median hours, p < 0.001). Other significant differences (intervention versus control) included lower rates of hospital admissions from the ED (19.3% versus 55.9%, p < 0.001), higher levels of satisfaction with the ED visit (p = 0.008), better function at 30-day (p = 0.01) and 6-month follow-up (p = 0.03), better mobility (p = 0.02 at 30 days), and better self-care (p = 0.03 at 30 days; p = 0.009 at 6 months). No differences at follow-up were observed in terms of ED re-presentation or hospital admission. Study limitations include the inability to blind patients or ED staff to allocation due to the nature of the intervention, and a focus on early assessment and intervention in the ED rather than care integration following discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Early assessment and intervention by a dedicated ED-based HSCP team reduced ED length of stay and the risk of hospital admissions among older adults, as well as improving patient satisfaction. Our findings support the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary model of care for key ED outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03739515; registered on 12 November 2018.

摘要

背景

老年人经常前往急诊科就诊,且在急诊科就诊后不良事件发生率较高。这项随机对照试验评估了急诊科由专业的健康和社会护理专业人员(HSCPs)组成的团队进行早期评估和干预,对急诊科老年患者护理质量、安全性和临床有效性的影响。

方法与结果

这项单中心随机对照试验纳入了353名年龄≥65岁的患者样本(平均年龄=79.6,标准差=7.01;59.2%为女性),这些患者在HSCP工作时间内向爱尔兰中西部地区一家大学医院的急诊科提出较低紧急程度的主诉。干预措施包括由一个由高级医疗社会工作者、高级职业治疗师和高级物理治疗师组成的HSCP团队进行早期评估和干预。主要结局是急诊科住院时间。次要结局包括急诊科住院后的住院率;住院患者的住院时间;患者对首次就诊的满意度;30天和6个月随访时的急诊科复诊率、死亡率、养老院入住率和非计划住院率;以及患者功能状态和生活质量(首次就诊时和随访时)。人口统计学信息包括患者的性别﹑年龄、婚姻状况﹑居住状况、到达急诊科的方式、转诊来源、主要主诉、分诊类别、跌倒情况和住院史。干预组(n = 176)的患者在急诊科的停留时间明显短于对照组(n = l77)(中位数分别为6.4小时和12.1小时,p < 0.001)。其他显著差异(干预组与对照组相比)包括急诊科住院后的住院率较低(19.3%对55.9%,p < 0.001)、对急诊科就诊的满意度较高(p = 0.008)﹑30天(p = 0.01)和6个月随访时(p = 0.03)功能更好、30天时活动能力更好(p = 0.02)和自我护理能力更好(30天时p = 0.03;6个月时p = = 0.009)。在随访时,急诊科再次就诊或住院方面未观察到差异。研究局限性包括由于干预的性质,无法使患者或急诊科工作人员对分组情况不知情,并且研究重点是急诊科的早期评估和干预,而非出院后的护理整合。

结论

由急诊科专业HSCP团队进行的早期评估和干预缩短了老年人在急诊科的住院时间,降低了住院风险,并提高了患者满意度。我们的研究结果支持了跨学科护理模式对急诊科关键结局的有效性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03739515;于2018年11月12日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4245/8318294/7f8415354672/pmed.1003711.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4245/8318294/7f8415354672/pmed.1003711.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4245/8318294/7f8415354672/pmed.1003711.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of assessment and intervention by a health and social care professional team in the emergency department on the quality, safety, and clinical effectiveness of care for older adults: A randomised controlled trial.急诊科健康与社会护理专业团队的评估与干预对老年人护理质量、安全性及临床有效性的影响:一项随机对照试验
PLoS Med. 2021 Jul 28;18(7):e1003711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003711. eCollection 2021 Jul.
2
A randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a dedicated health and social care professionals team in the emergency department on the quality, safety, clinical and cost-effectiveness of care for older adults: a study protocol.一项随机对照试验,旨在探索在急诊科中设立专门的医疗和社会保健专业人员团队对老年人护理的质量、安全性、临床效果和成本效益的影响:研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3697-5.
3
The cost effectiveness of early assessment and intervention by a dedicated health and social care professional team for older adults in the emergency department compared to treatment-as-usual: Economic evaluation of the OPTI-MEND trial.由专门的医疗和社会保健专业团队对急诊科的老年人进行早期评估和干预相对于常规治疗的成本效益:OPTI-MEND 试验的经济评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0298162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298162. eCollection 2024.
4
The impact of frailty Screening of Older adults with muLtidisciplinary assessment of those At Risk during emergency hospital attendance on the quality, safety and cost-effectiveness of care (SOLAR): a randomised controlled trial.多学科评估风险老年人的虚弱筛查对急诊就诊期间护理质量、安全性和成本效益的影响(SOLAR):一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2021 Aug 31;22(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05525-w.
5
The prevalence of malnutrition and impact on patient outcomes among older adults presenting at an Irish emergency department: a secondary analysis of the OPTI-MEND trial.爱尔兰急诊科老年患者营养不良的流行情况及其对患者结局的影响:OPTI-MEND 试验的二次分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Nov 7;20(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01852-w.
6
Impact of early assessment and intervention by teams involving health and social care professionals in the emergency department: A systematic review.急诊科多学科团队的早期评估和干预对健康和社会保健的影响:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0220709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220709. eCollection 2019.
7
Development and delivery of an allied health team intervention for older adults in the emergency department: A process evaluation.开发并实施一项针对急诊科老年患者的辅助医疗团队干预措施:过程评估。
PLoS One. 2022 May 26;17(5):e0269117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269117. eCollection 2022.
8
A physiotherapy-led transition to home intervention for older adults following emergency department discharge: protocol for a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial.急诊科出院后以物理治疗为主导的老年人家庭干预过渡:一项试点可行性随机对照试验方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Jan 3;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00954-5.
9
Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER) 2: a cluster randomised trial and systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new protocols for emergency ambulance paramedics to assess older people following a fall with referral to community-based care when appropriate.跌倒紧急转诊的支持与评估(SAFER)2:一项整群随机试验以及对新协议临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价,该协议用于紧急救护医护人员评估跌倒后的老年人,并在适当时转诊至社区护理。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar;21(13):1-218. doi: 10.3310/hta21130.
10
The impact of a new emergency admission avoidance system for older people on length of stay and same-day discharges.新的老年人急诊入院回避系统对住院时间和当日出院的影响。
Age Ageing. 2014 Jan;43(1):116-21. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft086. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
"Around the clock": Exploring health care professionals' experience of discharge of older people during out of hours from the emergency department: A qualitative study.“全天候”:探索医护人员在非工作时间从急诊科安排老年人出院的经历:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 22;20(8):e0313968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313968. eCollection 2025.
2
A qualitative study on the perspectives of patients and providers on the integration of geriatric personal support workers for improving quality of care in the emergency department.一项关于患者和医护人员对老年个人护理工作者融入急诊科以改善护理质量的看法的定性研究。
CJEM. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-00988-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Stakeholders' perspectives on models of care in the emergency department and the introduction of health and social care professional teams: A qualitative analysis using World Cafés and interviews.利益相关者对急诊科护理模式以及引入健康和社会照护专业团队的看法:使用世界咖啡屋和访谈进行的定性分析。
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1065-1073. doi: 10.1111/hex.13033. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
2
A randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a dedicated health and social care professionals team in the emergency department on the quality, safety, clinical and cost-effectiveness of care for older adults: a study protocol.一项随机对照试验,旨在探索在急诊科中设立专门的医疗和社会保健专业人员团队对老年人护理的质量、安全性、临床效果和成本效益的影响:研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3697-5.
3
Outcomes of Physical and Occupational Therapy Evaluation in the Emergency Department for Older Adults With Falls: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort.
急诊科对老年跌倒患者进行物理和职业治疗评估的结果:一项回顾性多中心队列研究
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 May 15;6(4):100141. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100141. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
The Experience of Frail Older Patients in the Boarding Area in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Systematic Review.急诊科候诊区虚弱老年患者的体验:一项定性系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 May 19;14(10):3556. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103556.
5
Low Back Pain Presentation and Management at the Emergency Department: Differences Between Older Adults Residing in the Community and Aged Care Homes.急诊科下腰痛的表现与管理:社区老年人与老年护理院老年人的差异
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e70088. doi: 10.1111/jep.70088.
6
A Multi-Stakeholder Qualitative Evaluation of ED PLUS: A Physiotherapy-Led Transition to Home Intervention for Older Adults Following Emergency Department Discharge.急诊加护的多利益相关者定性评估:以物理治疗为主导的急诊科出院后老年人居家干预过渡方案
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Feb 13;20:147-159. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S469933. eCollection 2025.
7
Rehabilitation in emergency departments: A regional scan and future opportunities.急诊科的康复治疗:区域调查与未来机遇
Healthc Manage Forum. 2025 May;38(3):263-272. doi: 10.1177/08404704241292240. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
8
Effectiveness of a Disability Liaison Officer service in a metropolitan emergency department.残疾联络官服务在大都市急诊科的有效性。
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb;37(1):e14513. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14513. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
9
Emergency department physiotherapists: consideration of perceived barriers and facilitators to help optimise their role in the Australian emergency department.急诊科物理治疗师:对感知到的障碍和促进因素的考量,以帮助优化其在澳大利亚急诊科的作用。
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 4;17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00714-1.
10
Demographics and scope of Australian emergency department physiotherapists.澳大利亚急诊科物理治疗师的人口统计学特征与范围
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 2;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00719-w.
Impact of early assessment and intervention by teams involving health and social care professionals in the emergency department: A systematic review.急诊科多学科团队的早期评估和干预对健康和社会保健的影响:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0220709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220709. eCollection 2019.
4
Implementing an allied health team intervention to improve the care of older adults in the emergency department: protocol for a process evaluation.实施辅助医疗团队干预措施以改善急诊科老年患者的护理:过程评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 16;9(7):e032645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032645.
5
Emergency Department Interventions for Older Adults: A Systematic Review.急诊科干预老年人:系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1516-1525. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15854. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
6
Staff and patients have mostly positive perceptions of physiotherapists working in emergency departments: a systematic review.工作人员和患者对在急诊科工作的物理治疗师的看法大多较为积极:系统评价。
J Physiother. 2018 Oct;64(4):229-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
7
Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions.急诊科拥挤:原因、后果和解决方案的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0203316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203316. eCollection 2018.
8
Effectiveness of the "Elderly Activity Performance Intervention" on elderly patients' discharge from a short-stay unit at the emergency department: a quasi-experimental trial.“老年活动表现干预”对急诊科短期留观老年患者出院效果的影响:一项准实验研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Apr 26;13:737-747. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S162623. eCollection 2018.
9
Association between the elderly frequent attender to the emergency department and 30-day mortality: A retrospective study over 10 years.急诊科老年频繁就诊者与30天死亡率之间的关联:一项为期10年的回顾性研究。
World J Emerg Med. 2018;9(1):20-25. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2018.01.003.
10
Adverse outcomes in older adults attending emergency departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Identification of Seniors At Risk (ISAR) screening tool.老年急诊患者的不良结局:对高危老年人识别(ISAR)筛查工具的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2017 Mar 1;46(2):179-186. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw233.