Suppr超能文献

急诊科健康与社会护理专业团队的评估与干预对老年人护理质量、安全性及临床有效性的影响:一项随机对照试验

Impact of assessment and intervention by a health and social care professional team in the emergency department on the quality, safety, and clinical effectiveness of care for older adults: A randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Cassarino Marica, Robinson Katie, Trépel Dominic, O'Shaughnessy Íde, Smalle Eimear, White Stephen, Devlin Collette, Quinn Rosie, Boland Fiona, Ward Marie E, McNamara Rosa, Steed Fiona, O'Connor Margaret, O'Regan Andrew, McCarthy Gerard, Ryan Damien, Galvin Rose

机构信息

School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Health Research Institute, Ageing Research Centre, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Ireland.

School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2021 Jul 28;18(7):e1003711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003711. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults frequently attend the emergency department (ED) and experience high rates of adverse events following ED presentation. This randomised controlled trial evaluated the impact of early assessment and intervention by a dedicated team of health and social care professionals (HSCPs) in the ED on the quality, safety, and clinical effectiveness of care of older adults in the ED.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This single-site randomised controlled trial included a sample of 353 patients aged ≥65 years (mean age = 79.6, SD = 7.01; 59.2% female) who presented with lower urgency complaints to the ED a university hospital in the Mid-West region of Ireland, during HSCP operational hours. The intervention consisted of early assessment and intervention carried out by a HSCP team comprising a senior medical social worker, senior occupational therapist, and senior physiotherapist. The primary outcome was ED length of stay. Secondary outcomes included rates of hospital admissions from the ED; hospital length of stay for admitted patients; patient satisfaction with index visit; ED revisits, mortality, nursing home admission, and unscheduled hospital admission at 30-day and 6-month follow-up; and patient functional status and quality of life (at index visit and follow-up). Demographic information included the patient's gender, age, marital status, residential status, mode of arrival to the ED, source of referral, index complaint, triage category, falls, and hospitalisation history. Participants in the intervention group (n = 176) experienced a significantly shorter ED stay than the control group (n = 177) (6.4 versus 12.1 median hours, p < 0.001). Other significant differences (intervention versus control) included lower rates of hospital admissions from the ED (19.3% versus 55.9%, p < 0.001), higher levels of satisfaction with the ED visit (p = 0.008), better function at 30-day (p = 0.01) and 6-month follow-up (p = 0.03), better mobility (p = 0.02 at 30 days), and better self-care (p = 0.03 at 30 days; p = 0.009 at 6 months). No differences at follow-up were observed in terms of ED re-presentation or hospital admission. Study limitations include the inability to blind patients or ED staff to allocation due to the nature of the intervention, and a focus on early assessment and intervention in the ED rather than care integration following discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Early assessment and intervention by a dedicated ED-based HSCP team reduced ED length of stay and the risk of hospital admissions among older adults, as well as improving patient satisfaction. Our findings support the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary model of care for key ED outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03739515; registered on 12 November 2018.

摘要

背景

老年人经常前往急诊科就诊,且在急诊科就诊后不良事件发生率较高。这项随机对照试验评估了急诊科由专业的健康和社会护理专业人员(HSCPs)组成的团队进行早期评估和干预,对急诊科老年患者护理质量、安全性和临床有效性的影响。

方法与结果

这项单中心随机对照试验纳入了353名年龄≥65岁的患者样本(平均年龄=79.6,标准差=7.01;59.2%为女性),这些患者在HSCP工作时间内向爱尔兰中西部地区一家大学医院的急诊科提出较低紧急程度的主诉。干预措施包括由一个由高级医疗社会工作者、高级职业治疗师和高级物理治疗师组成的HSCP团队进行早期评估和干预。主要结局是急诊科住院时间。次要结局包括急诊科住院后的住院率;住院患者的住院时间;患者对首次就诊的满意度;30天和6个月随访时的急诊科复诊率、死亡率、养老院入住率和非计划住院率;以及患者功能状态和生活质量(首次就诊时和随访时)。人口统计学信息包括患者的性别﹑年龄、婚姻状况﹑居住状况、到达急诊科的方式、转诊来源、主要主诉、分诊类别、跌倒情况和住院史。干预组(n = 176)的患者在急诊科的停留时间明显短于对照组(n = l77)(中位数分别为6.4小时和12.1小时,p < 0.001)。其他显著差异(干预组与对照组相比)包括急诊科住院后的住院率较低(19.3%对55.9%,p < 0.001)、对急诊科就诊的满意度较高(p = 0.008)﹑30天(p = 0.01)和6个月随访时(p = 0.03)功能更好、30天时活动能力更好(p = 0.02)和自我护理能力更好(30天时p = 0.03;6个月时p = = 0.009)。在随访时,急诊科再次就诊或住院方面未观察到差异。研究局限性包括由于干预的性质,无法使患者或急诊科工作人员对分组情况不知情,并且研究重点是急诊科的早期评估和干预,而非出院后的护理整合。

结论

由急诊科专业HSCP团队进行的早期评估和干预缩短了老年人在急诊科的住院时间,降低了住院风险,并提高了患者满意度。我们的研究结果支持了跨学科护理模式对急诊科关键结局的有效性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03739515;于2018年11月12日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4245/8318294/7f8415354672/pmed.1003711.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验