• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项元分析,探讨了学术干预对小学生学业成绩和学业焦虑结果的影响。

A meta-analysis of the effects of academic interventions on academic achievement and academic anxiety outcomes in elementary school children.

机构信息

The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, The University of Texas at Austin, USA.

National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Sch Psychol. 2022 Jun;92:265-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.03.011. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2022.03.011
PMID:35618374
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9136152/
Abstract

Research has shown that academic anxiety can affect academic performance and emotional well-being. Despite previous research emphasizing the importance of understanding academic anxiety and indicating a strong association between academic performance and academic anxiety, no systematic reviews or meta-analyses have examined the effects of academic interventions on academic and anxiety outcomes. This article reports on a meta-analysis of studies examining academic interventions conducted with elementary students (kindergarten to Grade 6), in which both academic achievement and academic anxiety outcomes were reported. The systematic search yielded 13 studies comprising 1545 participants and revealed statistically significant differences favoring academic treatments over the control for academic achievement outcomes (g = 0.63, k = 11) but no statistically significant benefits for academic anxiety outcomes (g = -0.06, k = 11). The authors caution against drawing strong conclusions due to the heterogeneity in effects and the small number of studies in the extant literature.

摘要

研究表明,学业焦虑会影响学业成绩和情绪健康。尽管先前的研究强调了理解学业焦虑的重要性,并表明学业成绩和学业焦虑之间存在很强的关联,但没有系统的综述或荟萃分析研究过学业干预对学业和焦虑结果的影响。本文报告了一项对针对小学生(幼儿园至 6 年级)进行的学业干预研究的荟萃分析,其中报告了学业成就和学业焦虑结果。系统搜索共产生了 13 项研究,包含 1545 名参与者,结果显示,与对照组相比,学业治疗对学业成就结果具有统计学上显著的优势(g=0.63,k=11),但对学业焦虑结果没有统计学上的益处(g=-0.06,k=11)。由于效应的异质性和现有文献中研究数量较少,作者告诫不要得出过于强烈的结论。

相似文献

1
A meta-analysis of the effects of academic interventions on academic achievement and academic anxiety outcomes in elementary school children.一项元分析,探讨了学术干预对小学生学业成绩和学业焦虑结果的影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2022 Jun;92:265-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.03.011. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
3
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
4
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
5
Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with or at risk of academic difficulties in Grades K-6: A systematic review.针对K-6年级有学习困难或有学习困难风险的学生提高阅读和数学能力的校本干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 6;17(2):e1152. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1152. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Anxiety, academic achievement, and academic self-concept: Meta-analytic syntheses of their relations across developmental periods.焦虑、学业成绩和学业自我概念:跨发展阶段相关关系的元分析综合。
Dev Psychopathol. 2023 Oct;35(4):1597-1613. doi: 10.1017/S0954579422000323. Epub 2022 May 2.
7
Effect of classroom-based physical activity interventions on academic and physical activity outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于课堂的体育活动干预对学业和体育活动结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Aug 25;14(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0569-9.
8
Academic enablers as dynamic moderators: Exploring academic enablers and achievement across elementary school.学术促进者作为动态的协调者:探究整个小学阶段的学术促进者和成就。
J Sch Psychol. 2021 Jun;86:15-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
Lifestyle intervention for improving school achievement in overweight or obese children and adolescents.改善超重或肥胖儿童及青少年学业成绩的生活方式干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 14(3):CD009728. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009728.pub2.
10
Test anxiety in primary school children: A 20-year systematic review and meta-analysis.小学生考试焦虑:一项 20 年的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
J Sch Psychol. 2023 Jun;98:39-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of the effects of academic interventions on academic and academic anxiety outcomes in secondary students.一项关于学术干预对中学生学业及学业焦虑结果影响的荟萃分析。
J Sch Psychol. 2025 Jun;110:101433. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101433. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
Unraveling the core symptoms of mental health in senior grade three students- a network analysis.剖析高三学生心理健康的核心症状——一项网络分析
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 22;15:1364334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1364334. eCollection 2024.
3
Understanding the relation between reading and anxiety among upper elementary students with reading difficulties.

本文引用的文献

1
Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with, or at risk of, academic difficulties in Grades 7-12: A systematic review.针对7至12年级有学习困难或有学习困难风险的学生提高阅读和数学能力的校本干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 1;16(2):e1081. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1081. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Examining the Reading and Cognitive Profiles of Students With Significant Reading Comprehension Difficulties.考察有显著阅读理解困难学生的阅读和认知概况。
Learn Disabil Q. 2021 Aug;44(3):183-196. doi: 10.1177/0731948721989973. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
3
Test anxiety, anxiety disorders, and school-related wellbeing: Manifestations of the same or different constructs?
了解阅读困难的小学高年级学生阅读与焦虑之间的关系。
Ann Dyslexia. 2024 Apr;74(1):123-141. doi: 10.1007/s11881-024-00299-7. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
4
Association between Electronic Media Use and Internalizing Problems: The Mediating Effect of Parent-Child Conflict and Moderating Effect of Children's Age.电子媒体使用与内化问题之间的关联:亲子冲突的中介作用和儿童年龄的调节作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 21;13(8):694. doi: 10.3390/bs13080694.
考试焦虑、焦虑障碍与学校相关的幸福感:相同还是不同结构的表现?
J Sch Psychol. 2021 Oct;88:47-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
4
Meta-analysis with Robust Variance Estimation: Expanding the Range of Working Models.稳健方差估计的元分析:拓展工作模型的范围。
Prev Sci. 2022 Apr;23(3):425-438. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01246-3. Epub 2021 May 7.
5
Evaluating meta-analytic methods to detect selective reporting in the presence of dependent effect sizes.评估元分析方法以在效应量相关的情况下检测选择性报告。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Jul 16. doi: 10.1037/met0000300.
6
The Relationship Between Study Quality and the Effects of Supplemental Reading Interventions: A Meta-Analysis.学习质量与补充阅读干预效果之间的关系:一项荟萃分析。
Except Child. 2019;85(3):347-366. doi: 10.1177/0014402918796164. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
7
The association between poor reading and internalising problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阅读困难与内化问题之间的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Feb;67:45-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
8
Prevalence and Treatment of Depression, Anxiety, and Conduct Problems in US Children.美国儿童的抑郁、焦虑和行为问题的患病率和治疗情况。
J Pediatr. 2019 Mar;206:256-267.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
9
Current Evidence on the Effects of Intensive Early Reading Interventions.当前关于强化早期阅读干预效果的证据。
J Learn Disabil. 2018 Nov/Dec;51(6):612-624. doi: 10.1177/0022219418775110. Epub 2018 May 21.
10
Neuropsychology of Learning Disabilities: The Past and the Future.学习障碍的神经心理学:过去与未来
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Oct;23(9-10):930-940. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717001084.