Chu Tiantian, Zhou Siqi, Wan Yingfeng, Liu Qiuli, Xin Yueyang, Tian Zhang, Yan Tianqing, Xu Aijun
Department of Anesthesiology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Geriatric Anesthesia and Perioperative Brain Health, and Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Anesthesia, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 5;15:1298409. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1298409. eCollection 2024.
Remimazolam has shown similar or even superior properties to propofol in procedural sedation in adults, but few studies have been conducted in pediatric populations. Thus, we aimed to compare the effect and safety of remimazolam and propofol combined with low dose esketamine for pediatric same-day bidirectional endoscopy (BDE). Pediatrics <18 years scheduled for elective BDE under sedation were included and randomly assigned to remimazolam group (R group) or propofol group (P group). The primary outcome was the success rate of sedation. Secondary outcomes include sedation-related information and adverse events. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and perfusion index (PI) were recorded during sedation. A total of 106 patients were enrolled and analyzed. The success rate of sedation was 100% in both groups. Compared with the P group, the induction time of the R group was significantly prolonged ( < 0.001), and the incidence of injection pain, intraoperative respiratory depression, hypotension and bradycardia was significantly lower ( < 0.001). The changes in MAP, HR and PI were relatively stable in the R group compared with the P group. Additionally, awake time significantly decreased with age by approximately 1.12 index points for each increase in age in the P group ( = 0.002) but not in the R group ( > 0.05). Furthermore, the decline in PI and PI ratio during BDE was related to body movement in the P group. Remimazolam combined with low dose esketamine has a non-inferior sedative effect than propofol for pediatric BDE, with no injection pain, less respiratory depression, more stable hemodynamics. Moreover, early detection of the decline in PI may avoid harmful stimulation under light anesthesia. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05686863?id=NCT05686863&rank=1, NCT05686863.
瑞马唑仑在成人程序性镇静中已显示出与丙泊酚相似甚至更优的特性,但在儿科人群中进行的研究较少。因此,我们旨在比较瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚联合低剂量艾司氯胺酮用于儿科当日双向内镜检查(BDE)的效果和安全性。纳入计划在镇静下进行择期BDE的18岁以下儿科患者,并随机分为瑞马唑仑组(R组)或丙泊酚组(P组)。主要结局是镇静成功率。次要结局包括与镇静相关的信息和不良事件。在镇静期间记录平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)和灌注指数(PI)。共纳入106例患者并进行分析。两组的镇静成功率均为100%。与P组相比,R组的诱导时间显著延长(<0.001),注射痛、术中呼吸抑制、低血压和心动过缓的发生率显著降低(<0.001)。与P组相比,R组的MAP、HR和PI变化相对稳定。此外,P组清醒时间随年龄显著减少,每增加一岁约减少1.12个指数点(=0.002),而R组则无此现象(>0.05)。此外,P组BDE期间PI和PI比值的下降与身体移动有关。瑞马唑仑联合低剂量艾司氯胺酮用于儿科BDE的镇静效果不劣于丙泊酚,无注射痛,呼吸抑制较少,血流动力学更稳定。此外,早期检测PI下降可避免浅麻醉下的有害刺激。https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05686863?id=NCT05686863&rank=1, NCT05686863