• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何提出正确的问题并找到正确的答案:移植肾脏病学家的临床研究。

How to Ask the Right Question and Find the Right Answer: Clinical Research for Transplant Nephrologists.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2022 May 10;13:879200. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.879200. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2022.879200
PMID:35619692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9128998/
Abstract

Clinical research is about asking and answering questions. Before solutions relevant to clinical problems can be sought, clinicians must frame questions in ways that are answerable using the methods of clinical research. Different types of questions are best answered using specific study designs. Each design has inherent strengths and limitations. In this review article, we provide an approach to asking answerable clinical research questions, review the major study designs, describe their strengths and weaknesses, and link the study designs to their intended purposes.

摘要

临床研究就是提出并回答问题。在寻求与临床问题相关的解决方案之前,临床医生必须以能够通过临床研究方法回答的方式提出问题。不同类型的问题最好使用特定的研究设计来回答。每种设计都有其固有的优势和局限性。在这篇综述文章中,我们提供了一种提出可回答的临床研究问题的方法,回顾了主要的研究设计,描述了它们的优缺点,并将研究设计与其预期目的联系起来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/ec3e14370261/fimmu-13-879200-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/e29983c9d039/fimmu-13-879200-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/8a3c9de39e5b/fimmu-13-879200-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/02d5e37262ad/fimmu-13-879200-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/0fce77df036d/fimmu-13-879200-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/edfe895ba836/fimmu-13-879200-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/33faa5047ec3/fimmu-13-879200-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/ec3e14370261/fimmu-13-879200-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/e29983c9d039/fimmu-13-879200-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/8a3c9de39e5b/fimmu-13-879200-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/02d5e37262ad/fimmu-13-879200-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/0fce77df036d/fimmu-13-879200-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/edfe895ba836/fimmu-13-879200-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/33faa5047ec3/fimmu-13-879200-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665f/9128998/ec3e14370261/fimmu-13-879200-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
How to Ask the Right Question and Find the Right Answer: Clinical Research for Transplant Nephrologists.如何提出正确的问题并找到正确的答案:移植肾脏病学家的临床研究。
Front Immunol. 2022 May 10;13:879200. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.879200. eCollection 2022.
2
Hierarchy of research design used to categorize the "strength of evidence" in answering clinical dental questions.用于对回答临床牙科问题时的“证据强度”进行分类的研究设计层次结构。
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Feb;83(2):137-52. doi: 10.1053/pr.2000.v83.apr832137.
3
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
4
Systematic reviews in context: highlighting systematic reviews relevant to Africa in the Pan African Medical Journal.背景下的系统评价:突出《泛非医学杂志》中与非洲相关的系统评价。
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Jun 30;24:180. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.24.180.10100. eCollection 2016.
5
Study designs in clinical research.临床研究中的研究设计。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2009;113(3):c218-21. doi: 10.1159/000235610. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
6
Asking good clinical research questions and choosing the right study design.提出好的临床研究问题并选择正确的研究设计。
Injury. 2010 Jul;41 Suppl 1:S3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.016. Epub 2010 May 13.
7
Call on me! Undergraduates' perceptions of voluntarily asking and answering questions in front of large-enrollment science classes.呼唤我!大学生对大课上自愿提问和回答问题的看法。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):e0243731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243731. eCollection 2021.
8
Types of Research Questions: Descriptive, Predictive, or Causal.研究问题的类型:描述性、预测性或因果性。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Aug;50(8):468-469. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.0703.
9
Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.流行病学方法与应用概述:观察性研究设计的优势与局限性。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.526838.
10
Deficient counseling on physical activity among nephrologists.肾科医生在身体活动方面的咨询不足。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;116(4):c330-6. doi: 10.1159/000319593. Epub 2010 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial: Future challenges and directions in determining allo-immunity in kidney transplantation.社论:肾移植中确定同种异体免疫的未来挑战与方向
Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 31;13:1013711. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1013711. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Causal Directed Acyclic Graphs.因果有向无环图
JAMA. 2022 Mar 15;327(11):1083-1084. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1816.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans.BNT162b2 与 mRNA-1273 疫苗在美国退伍军人中的比较效力。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 13;386(2):105-115. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2115463. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
3
Methods of Public Health Research - Strengthening Causal Inference from Observational Data.公共卫生研究方法——加强基于观察性数据的因果推断
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 7;385(15):1345-1348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2113319. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
4
BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting.BNT162b2 mRNA 新冠病毒疫苗在全国大规模疫苗接种环境中的效果。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1412-1423. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2101765. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
5
Pre-transplant HLA Antibodies and Delayed Graft Function in the Current Era of Kidney Transplantation.移植前 HLA 抗体与当代肾移植中的延迟移植物功能。
Front Immunol. 2020 Aug 26;11:1886. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01886. eCollection 2020.
6
Meta-Analysis.荟萃分析
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1S):S97-S102. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003.
7
Avoidable flaws in observational analyses: an application to statins and cancer.避免观察性分析中的缺陷:他汀类药物与癌症的应用。
Nat Med. 2019 Oct;25(10):1601-1606. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0597-x. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
8
Rabbit-ATG or basiliximab induction for rapid steroid withdrawal after renal transplantation (Harmony): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白或巴利昔单抗诱导治疗在肾移植后快速撤停激素(Harmony):一项开放标签、多中心、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 17;388(10063):3006-3016. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32187-0. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
9
Con: Meta-analysis: some key limitations and potential solutions.反对观点:荟萃分析:一些关键局限性及潜在解决方案。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016 Jun;31(6):882-5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw092.
10
A Guide to Conducting a Meta-Analysis.荟萃分析实施指南
Neuropsychol Rev. 2016 Jun;26(2):121-8. doi: 10.1007/s11065-016-9319-z. Epub 2016 May 21.