Kneeshaw Daniel D, Sturtevant Brian R, DeGrandpé Louis, Doblas-Miranda Enrique, James Patrick M A, Tardif Dominique, Burton Philip J
Centre for Forest Research, University of Québec in Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Rhinelander, WI USA.
Curr For Rep. 2021;7(2):97-113. doi: 10.1007/s40725-021-00140-z. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
Forest managers have long suggested that forests can be made more resilient to insect pests by reducing the abundance of hosts, yet this has rarely been done. The goal of our paper is to review whether recent scientific evidence supports forest manipulation to decrease vulnerability. To achieve this goal, we first ask if outbreaks of forest insect pests have been more severe in recent decades. Next, we assess the relative importance of climate change and forest management-induced changes in forest composition/structure in driving these changes in severity.
Forest structure and composition continue to be implicated in pest outbreak severity. Mechanisms, however, remain elusive. Recent research elucidates how forest compositional and structural diversity at neighbourhood, stand, and landscape scales can increase forest resistance to outbreaks. Many recent outbreaks of herbivorous forest insects have been unprecedented in terms of duration and spatial extent. Climate change may be a contributing factor, but forest structure and composition have been clearly identified as contributing to these unprecedented outbreaks.
Current research supports using silviculture to create forest landscapes. However, the precise mechanisms by which silviculture can increase resistance remains uncertain. Further, humans tend to more often create forests due to political, economic, and human resistance to change and a short-sighted risk management perspective that focuses on reactive rather than proactive responses to insect outbreak threats. Future research efforts need to focus on social, political, cultural, and educational mechanisms to motivate implementation of proven ecological solutions if pest-resistant forests are to be favoured by management.
长期以来,森林管理者一直认为,通过减少寄主数量可以使森林对害虫更具抵御能力,但很少有人这样做。我们论文的目的是回顾近期的科学证据是否支持通过森林经营措施来降低森林的脆弱性。为实现这一目标,我们首先要问近几十年来森林害虫的爆发是否更为严重。接下来,我们评估气候变化和森林经营导致的森林组成/结构变化在推动这些严重程度变化方面的相对重要性。
森林结构和组成仍然与害虫爆发的严重程度有关。然而,其机制仍不明确。近期研究阐明了在林分、林分和景观尺度上森林组成和结构多样性如何增加森林对害虫爆发的抵抗力。许多近期食草性森林昆虫的爆发在持续时间和空间范围方面都是前所未有的。气候变化可能是一个促成因素,但森林结构和组成已被明确认定为导致这些前所未有的爆发的因素。
当前的研究支持利用造林学营造森林景观。然而,造林学增加抵抗力的确切机制仍不确定。此外,由于政治、经济因素以及人类对变革的抵触和短视的风险管理观念,即侧重于对害虫爆发威胁的被动而非主动应对,人类往往更倾向于营造人工林。如果要让管理部门青睐抗虫森林,未来的研究工作需要聚焦于社会、政治、文化和教育机制,以推动实施已证实的生态解决方案。