Andrews Colm D, Sheldon Aislin A, Bridge Holly, Downes Susan M, MacLaren Robert E, Jolly Jasleen K
Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 May 19;16:1513-1523. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S352004. eCollection 2022.
We aimed to assess the performance of the modified-Esterman test (mET) as a rapid suprathreshold binocular quantification tool for the assessment of peripheral visual fields. The mET consists of an even spread of test points across the visual field.
The mET was implemented on the Octopus 0900 perimeter using the Open Perimetry Interface (OPI) and consisted of 160 points. Patients with choroideremia, a rod-cone dystrophy, Stargardt disease, a cone-rod dystrophy, and healthy volunteers underwent both the mET and the standard Esterman tests twice. Disease severity (mild/moderate/severe) was graded on both tests independently. Voronoi tessellation was utilised to compare the tests.
The Voronoi visualisation was able to demonstrate that the mET was able to provide more information about the disease state at all stages of diseases. This was confirmed by the agreement statistic, which showed that the mET detected 27% more points of visual field loss compared to the Esterman test, being most useful in patients with rod-cone dystrophies.
The mET provides a speedy quantitative measure of the peripheral visual field loss, which can be used in clinical trials to monitor longitudinal assessment of peripheral visual function. The mET provides a more even coverage across the visual field compared to the Esterman test points, making it more suitable for this purpose. This is a key part of safety monitoring in retinal clinical trials. The mET can easily be implemented on commercially available perimeters that allow Open Perimetry.
我们旨在评估改良的埃斯特曼测试(mET)作为一种快速超阈值双眼定量工具用于评估周边视野的性能。mET由均匀分布在视野中的测试点组成。
使用开放视野检查接口(OPI)在Octopus 0900视野计上实施mET,其包含160个测试点。患有先天性静止性夜盲症(一种视杆 - 视锥营养不良)、斯塔加特病(一种视锥 - 视杆营养不良)的患者以及健康志愿者均接受了两次mET和标准埃斯特曼测试。在两项测试中分别独立对疾病严重程度(轻度/中度/重度)进行分级。利用泰森多边形法比较这两项测试。
泰森多边形可视化能够证明mET能够在疾病的各个阶段提供更多关于疾病状态的信息。一致性统计证实了这一点,该统计表明与埃斯特曼测试相比,mET检测到的视野缺损点多27%,在视杆 - 视锥营养不良患者中最为有用。
mET提供了一种快速定量评估周边视野缺损的方法,可用于临床试验以监测周边视觉功能的纵向评估。与埃斯特曼测试点相比,mET在视野上提供了更均匀的覆盖,使其更适合此目的。这是视网膜临床试验安全监测的关键部分。mET可以很容易地在允许开放视野检查的商用视野计上实施。