Suppr超能文献

超声引导下腰椎内侧支阻滞和关节内小关节注射:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Ultrasound-guided lumbar medial branch blocks and intra-articular facet joint injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ashmore Zachary M, Bies Michael M, Meiling James B, Moman Rajat N, Hassett Leslie C, Hunt Christine L, Cohen Steven P, Hooten W Michael

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Pain Rep. 2022 May 16;7(3):e1008. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001008. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.

Abstract

There is great interest in expanding the use of ultrasound (US), but new challenges exist with its application to lumbar facet-targeted procedures. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the risk of incorrect needle placement associated with US-guided lumbar medial branch blocks (MBB) and facet joint injections (FJI) as confirmed by fluoroscopy or computerized tomography (CT). An a priori protocol was registered, and a database search was conducted. Inclusion criteria included all study types. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood tool for assessing risk bias for observational cohort studies. Pooled analysis of the risk difference (RD) of incorrect needle placement was calculated. Pooled analysis of 7 studies demonstrated an 11% RD ( < 0.0009) of incorrect needle placement for US-guided MBB confirmed using fluoroscopy with and without contrast. Pooled analysis of 3 studies demonstrated a 13% RD ( < 0.0001) of incorrect needle placement for US-guided FJI confirmed using CT. The time to complete a single-level MBB ranged from 2.6 to 5.0 minutes. The certainty of evidence was low to very low. Ultrasound-guided lumbar MBB and FJI are associated with a significant risk of incorrect needle placement when confirmed by fluoroscopy or CT. The technical limitations of US and individual patient factors could contribute to the risk of incorrect needle placement.

摘要

人们对扩大超声(US)的应用兴趣浓厚,但其在腰椎小关节靶向手术中的应用存在新的挑战。本系统评价和荟萃分析的主要目的是确定经荧光透视或计算机断层扫描(CT)证实的,与超声引导下腰椎内侧支阻滞(MBB)和小关节突关节注射(FJI)相关的不正确进针位置的风险。预先注册了一个方案,并进行了数据库搜索。纳入标准包括所有研究类型。使用Cochrane随机对照试验偏倚风险工具和美国国立心肺血液研究所用于评估观察性队列研究风险偏倚的工具评估偏倚风险。计算不正确进针位置风险差异(RD)的汇总分析。对7项研究的汇总分析表明,在使用或不使用造影剂的荧光透视证实的超声引导下MBB中,不正确进针位置的RD为11%(<0.0009)。对3项研究的汇总分析表明,在CT证实的超声引导下FJI中,不正确进针位置的RD为13%(<0.0001)。完成单节段MBB的时间为2.6至5.0分钟。证据的确定性为低至极低。经荧光透视或CT证实,超声引导下腰椎MBB和FJI存在不正确进针位置的显著风险。超声的技术局限性和个体患者因素可能导致不正确进针位置的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8b9/9113209/4ad75cb8dee8/painreports-7-e1008-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验