Akhtar Muhammad Adeel, Hoellwarth Jason Shih, Tetsworth Kevin, Oomatia Atiya, Al Muderis Munjed
Trauma and Orthopaedic Department, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, NHS Fife, Kirkcaldy, Scotland, UK.
Limb Salvage and Amputation Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Arthroplast Today. 2022 May 21;16:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.04.008. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Management of total knee replacement (TKR) infection may sometimes prompt knee fusion (KF) or transfemoral amputation (TFA), both associated with low mobility and quality of life (QOL). Transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees provides superior mobility and QOL vs traditional socket prostheses but has not been studied for patients with a history of infected TKR. This study investigates the following hypothesis: Patients who have had TFA or KF following infected TKR achieve better mobility and QOL following transfemoral osseointegration.
A retrospective evaluation of the prospectively maintained registry identified 10 patients who had prior infected TKR. The mobility assessments (patient daily prosthesis wear time, K-level, Timed Up and Go, 6-Minute Walk Test) and QOL surveys (Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation Global, Mobility, and Problem scores) were compared preoperatively and after at least 2 years. Complications requiring an additional surgery were also evaluated.
Daily wear hours, K-level, and 6-Minute Walk Test and Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation Global and Problem scores significantly improved ( < .05). Through 1 year, 4 patients (40%) had additional surgeries. After several years, 7 patients (70%) had at least 1 additional surgery, and 5 (50%) had multiple, for an average of 1 debridement and 1.3 soft-tissue refashionings per patient. One patient died of newly diagnosed cancer 1 year after transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees.
Transfemoral osseointegration confers significantly better mobility and QOL vs KF or a TFA with traditional socket prostheses following infected TKR. Technique improvements to prevent subsequent surgeries may provide an increasingly streamlined experience.
全膝关节置换术(TKR)感染的管理有时可能会促使进行膝关节融合术(KF)或经股骨截肢术(TFA),这两种手术都与低活动能力和生活质量(QOL)相关。经皮骨整合技术应用于截肢患者时,与传统的接受腔假肢相比,能提供更好的活动能力和生活质量,但尚未针对有TKR感染病史的患者进行研究。本研究调查了以下假设:在感染性TKR后接受TFA或KF的患者,在经股骨骨整合后可获得更好的活动能力和生活质量。
对前瞻性维护的登记册进行回顾性评估,确定了10例既往有感染性TKR的患者。比较术前和至少2年后的活动能力评估(患者每日假肢佩戴时间、K级、计时起立行走测试、6分钟步行测试)和生活质量调查(经股骨截肢者全球、活动能力和问题评分问卷)。还评估了需要额外手术的并发症。
每日佩戴时间、K级、6分钟步行测试以及经股骨截肢者全球和问题评分问卷得分均有显著改善(P<0.05)。在1年时间里,4例患者(40%)接受了额外手术。几年后,7例患者(70%)至少接受了1次额外手术,5例患者(50%)接受了多次额外手术,平均每位患者进行了1次清创和1.3次软组织重塑。1例患者在经皮骨整合治疗截肢者1年后死于新诊断的癌症。
与感染性TKR后采用KF或带传统接受腔假肢的TFA相比,经股骨骨整合可显著改善活动能力和生活质量。预防后续手术的技术改进可能会带来越来越简化的治疗体验。