Cognitive Robotics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, CA.
Hum Factors. 2023 Nov;65(7):1336-1344. doi: 10.1177/00187208221101301. Epub 2022 May 27.
To share results of an experiment that used visual occlusion for a new purpose: inducing a waiting time.
Senders was a leading figure in human factors. In his research on the visual demands of driving, he used occlusion techniques.
In a simulator experiment, we examined how drivers brake for different levels of urgency and different visual conditions. In three blocks (1 = brake lights, 2 = no brake lights, 3 = occlusion), drivers followed a vehicle at 13.4 or 33.4 m distance. At certain moments, the lead vehicle decelerated moderately (1.7 m/s) or strongly (6.5 m/s). In the occlusion condition, the screens blanked for 0.4 s (if 6.5 m/s) or 2.0 s (if 1.7 m/s) when the lead vehicle started to decelerate. Participants were instructed to brake only after the occlusion ended.
The lack of brake lights caused a delayed response. In the occlusion condition, drivers adapted to the instructed late braking by braking harder. However, adaptation was not always possible: In the most urgent condition, most participants collided with the lead vehicle because the ego-vehicle's deceleration limits were reached. In non-urgent conditions, some drivers braked unnecessarily hard. Furthermore, while waiting until the occlusion cleared, some drivers lightly touched the brake pedal.
This experimental design demonstrates how drivers (sometimes fail to) adjust their braking behavior to the criticality of the situation.
The phenomena of biomechanical readiness and (inappropriate) dosing of the brake pedal may be relevant to safety, traffic flow, and ADAS design.
分享一个实验的结果,该实验将视觉遮挡用于一个新的目的:诱导等待时间。
发送者是人为因素领域的领军人物。在他关于驾驶视觉需求的研究中,他使用了遮挡技术。
在模拟器实验中,我们研究了驾驶员在不同紧急程度和不同视觉条件下如何刹车。在三个块(1 = 刹车灯,2 = 无刹车灯,3 = 遮挡)中,驾驶员以 13.4 或 33.4 m 的距离跟随一辆车。在某些时刻,前车适度(1.7 m/s)或强烈(6.5 m/s)减速。在遮挡条件下,当前车开始减速时,屏幕会在 0.4 s(如果是 6.5 m/s)或 2.0 s(如果是 1.7 m/s)时黑屏。参与者被指示仅在遮挡结束后才刹车。
没有刹车灯导致反应延迟。在遮挡条件下,驾驶员通过更用力地刹车来适应指令的延迟刹车。然而,适应并不总是可能的:在最紧急的情况下,由于自身车辆的减速限制,大多数参与者与前车发生碰撞。在非紧急情况下,一些驾驶员不必要地用力刹车。此外,在等待遮挡清除的过程中,一些驾驶员轻触刹车踏板。
该实验设计演示了驾驶员(有时未能)如何根据情况的紧急程度调整其刹车行为。
生物力学准备和(不适当)踩刹车踏板的现象可能与安全、交通流量和 ADAS 设计有关。