• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非医用大麻营销影响下的青少年类型学及其与消费模式的关联。

Typology of Adolescents Exposed to Non-medical Cannabis Marketing and Associations with Consumption Patterns.

机构信息

Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound St #450, Emeryville, CA, 94608, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, 135 Dauer Drive Campus, Box 7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2022 Oct;23(7):1276-1286. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01378-0. Epub 2022 May 27.

DOI:10.1007/s11121-022-01378-0
PMID:35622192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10326727/
Abstract

Latent class analysis (LCA) identified subtypes of cannabis marketing exposure among adolescents and assessed whether the classes were associated with three cannabis use outcomes: past 28-day use, poly-cannabis use, and symptoms of cannabis use disorder (CUD). Survey data were from 471 adolescents (aged 15-19 years) who lived in four states with legal non-medical cannabis in 2018. Measures included social media engagement and cannabis outcomes. LCA with robust maximum likelihood estimation identified latent classes. Chi-squared tests assessed whether empirically derived classes differed across demographics, and logistic regression tested associations with cannabis use outcomes. Three classes were identified: digitally engaged (35.5%), digitally unengaged (36.5%), and traditional (28.0%). Both digitally engaged and unengaged classes were exposed to marketing on social media platforms, but youth in the engaged class interacted with posts and brands. Class membership differed by age (χ = 14.89, p < 0.001) and school type, with the digitally engaged group older and not in school or in non-traditional schools (χ = 16.22, p=0.01). As compared to the traditional class, youth in the digitally engaged class had 10.63 times the odds of past 28-day cannabis use (95% CI: 5.25, 21.51), 7.84 times the odds of poly-cannabis use (95% CI: 3.54, 17.33), and 13.85 times the odds of symptoms of CUD (95% CI: 3.96, 48.48). Youth in the digitally engaged class had higher odds of all cannabis use behaviors than the traditional class. These findings point to the possible use of algorithmic marketing to adolescents and suggest a need for monitoring and possible restrictions on digital cannabis marketing.

摘要

潜在类别分析(LCA)确定了青少年中大麻营销暴露的亚类,并评估了这些类别是否与三种大麻使用结果相关:过去 28 天的使用、多大麻使用和大麻使用障碍(CUD)的症状。调查数据来自 2018 年居住在四个州的 471 名青少年(年龄在 15-19 岁之间),这些州的非医疗大麻合法。测量包括社交媒体参与度和大麻结果。使用稳健最大似然估计的 LCA 确定了潜在类别。卡方检验评估了经验上得出的类别是否在人口统计学上存在差异,逻辑回归检验了与大麻使用结果的关联。确定了三个类别:数字参与(35.5%)、数字不参与(36.5%)和传统(28.0%)。数字参与和不参与的两类都接触到了社交媒体平台上的营销,但参与类别的年轻人会与帖子和品牌互动。类别的成员差异因年龄(χ²=14.89,p<0.001)和学校类型而异,数字参与组年龄较大,不在学校或非传统学校(χ²=16.22,p=0.01)。与传统类别相比,数字参与类别的年轻人过去 28 天使用大麻的几率高出 10.63 倍(95%CI:5.25,21.51),多使用大麻的几率高出 7.84 倍(95%CI:3.54,17.33),出现大麻使用障碍症状的几率高出 13.85 倍(95%CI:3.96,48.48)。数字参与类别的年轻人出现所有大麻使用行为的几率都高于传统类别。这些发现表明,青少年可能会受到算法营销的影响,并表明需要对数字大麻营销进行监测和可能的限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b43b/10326727/6e48759e570f/nihms-1908237-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b43b/10326727/6e48759e570f/nihms-1908237-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b43b/10326727/6e48759e570f/nihms-1908237-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Typology of Adolescents Exposed to Non-medical Cannabis Marketing and Associations with Consumption Patterns.非医用大麻营销影响下的青少年类型学及其与消费模式的关联。
Prev Sci. 2022 Oct;23(7):1276-1286. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01378-0. Epub 2022 May 27.
2
Cannabis Marketing and Problematic Cannabis Use Among Adolescents.大麻营销与青少年的不良大麻使用。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021 Mar;82(2):288-296. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2021.82.288.
3
Exposure to Cannabis Marketing in Social and Traditional Media and Past-Year Use Among Adolescents in States With Legal Retail Cannabis.在有合法零售大麻的州,青少年在社会和传统媒体中接触大麻营销以及过去一年的使用情况。
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Feb;66(2):247-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
4
Differential patterns of e-cigarette and tobacco marketing exposures among youth: Associations with substance use and tobacco prevention strategies.青少年电子烟和烟草营销接触的差异模式:与物质使用及烟草预防策略的关联
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Dec;86:102925. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102925. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
5
Active cannabis marketing and adolescent past-year cannabis use.积极的大麻营销与青少年过去一年的大麻使用情况。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107548. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107548. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
6
Differentiating people who use cannabis heavily through latent class analysis.通过潜在类别分析区分重度使用大麻的人群。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Jun 1;18(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00540-3.
7
A latent class analysis of cannabis use products in a general population sample of adolescents and their association with paranoia, hallucinations, cognitive disorganisation and grandiosity.在青少年一般人群样本中对大麻使用产品进行潜在类别分析及其与妄想、幻觉、认知紊乱和夸大妄想的关联。
Addict Behav. 2021 Jun;117:106837. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106837. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
Self-reported mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and its association with alcohol and cannabis use: a latent class analysis.在 COVID-19 大流行期间的自我报告心理健康状况及其与酒精和大麻使用的关联:潜在类别分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 30;22(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03917-z.
9
Developmental patterns of tobacco product and cannabis use initiation in high school.高中生中烟草制品和大麻使用的起始发展模式。
Addiction. 2021 Feb;116(2):382-393. doi: 10.1111/add.15161. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
10
Polysubstance use among youth experiencing homelessness: The role of trauma, mental health, and social network composition.青年 homeless 群体中的多物质使用:创伤、心理健康和社会网络构成的作用。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Nov 1;216:108228. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108228. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Proximal Exposure to THC Vape Ads Is Associated with Event-Level Vaping Among Young Adults.青少年近端接触四氢大麻酚电子烟广告与事件层面的电子烟吸食有关。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.15288/jsad.25-00087.
2
Clinician perspectives on barriers and facilitators to the treatment of adolescent cannabis use: A qualitative study.临床医生对青少年大麻使用治疗障碍与促进因素的看法:一项定性研究
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Feb;169:209559. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209559. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
3
Cannabis-Derived Product Types, Flavors, and Compound Types From an E-Commerce Website.

本文引用的文献

1
Cannabis Marketing and Problematic Cannabis Use Among Adolescents.大麻营销与青少年的不良大麻使用。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021 Mar;82(2):288-296. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2021.82.288.
2
Alcohol Marketing in the Era of Digital Media Platforms.数字媒体平台时代的酒精营销
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021 Jan;82(1):18-27.
3
Youth Exposure to Marijuana Advertising in Oregon's Legal Retail Marijuana Market.俄勒冈州合法零售大麻市场中青少年接触大麻广告的情况。
从电商网站看大麻衍生产品类型、口味和化合物类型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2440376. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40376.
4
Patterns in Tobacco, E-Cigarette, and Cannabis Advertising Exposure Among California Adolescents and Associations With Future Use Expectations.加州青少年在烟草、电子烟和大麻广告中的暴露模式及其与未来使用预期的关联。
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(8):1240-1248. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2330912. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Sep 24;17:E110. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.190206.
4
Using Latent Profile Analysis and Related Approaches in Adolescent Health Research.在青少年健康研究中运用潜在剖面分析及相关方法。
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Aug;67(2):153-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.005.
5
The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent.社交媒体对幸福感的影响因青少年而异。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 1;10(1):10763. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67727-7.
6
What is the prevalence and risk of cannabis use disorders among people who use cannabis? a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用大麻的人群中大麻使用障碍的患病率和风险是多少?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Addict Behav. 2020 Oct;109:106479. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106479. Epub 2020 May 20.
7
Digital media use and subsequent cannabis and tobacco product use initiation among adolescents.青少年使用数字媒体与随后的大麻和烟草制品使用的关系。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:108017. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108017. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
8
Alcohol Marketing and Youth Drinking: Is There a Causal Relationship, and Why Does It Matter?酒精营销与青少年饮酒:是否存在因果关系,以及为何这很重要?
J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2020 Mar(19):5-12. doi: 10.15288/jsads.2020.s19.5.
9
Cannabis advertising, promotion and branding: Differences in consumer exposure between 'legal' and 'illegal' markets in Canada and the US.大麻广告、促销与品牌塑造:加拿大和美国“合法”与“非法”市场中消费者接触情况的差异
Prev Med. 2020 Feb 3;133:106013. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106013.
10
Definition of a 'standard joint equivalent': Comment on "Who consumes most of the cannabis in Canada? Profiles of cannabis consumption by quantity".“标准关节等效物”的定义:对“谁在加拿大消费最多的大麻?按数量划分的大麻消费概况”的评论。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jan 1;206:107731. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107731. Epub 2019 Nov 14.