Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Department of Health Promotion and Policy, University of Massachusetts Amherst School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Amherst, Massachusetts.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021 Mar;82(2):288-296. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2021.82.288.
Health consequences of commercializing nonmedical cannabis remain unclear, but data suggest that youth may encounter unintended risks. This study examined whether cannabis marketing exposure and engagement are associated with problematic cannabis use among adolescents.
The analytic sample included 172 lifetime cannabis users (15-19 years old) who lived in one of six states with legalized nonmedical cannabis in 2018. Predictors included having exposure to or engagement with cannabis marketing on Facebook or Instagram, seeing cannabis billboards, owning/likely to own cannabis-branded merchandise, and reporting a favorite cannabis brand. Logistic regression assessed whether these predictors were associated with weekly cannabis use, high-intensity cannabis use, and cannabis use disorder (CUD).
Adolescents who saw billboards rarely/sometimes had 5 times the odds of CUD, whereas youth who saw them most/all of the time had 7 times the odds of weekly use and 6 times the odds of CUD. Adolescents who owned/were likely to own branded merchandise had nearly 23 times the odds of weekly use, and those with a favorite brand had 3 times the odds of weekly use and CUD. Adolescents who reported seeing promotions on Instagram rarely/sometimes had 85% lower odds of weekly use, and those who saw them most/all of the time had 93% lower odds.
The ways cannabis businesses market their products, especially branding, may affect patterns of underage cannabis use. Future research should test whether these associations persist in longitudinal designs. In the interim, states should consider an approach that offers youth additional means to protect them from cannabis marketing.
将医用大麻商业化所带来的健康后果尚不清楚,但有数据表明,青少年可能会遭遇意料之外的风险。本研究旨在探究大麻营销的接触和参与是否与青少年的不良大麻使用有关。
分析样本包括 2018 年居住在六个州的 172 名有终生大麻使用史的青少年(15-19 岁)。预测因素包括在 Facebook 或 Instagram 上接触或参与大麻营销、看到大麻广告牌、拥有/可能拥有大麻品牌商品以及报告最喜爱的大麻品牌。逻辑回归评估这些预测因素与每周大麻使用、高强度大麻使用和大麻使用障碍(CUD)的相关性。
很少/有时看到广告牌的青少年出现 CUD 的可能性是广告牌经常/总是出现的青少年的 5 倍,而前者每周使用大麻的可能性是后者的 7 倍,出现 CUD 的可能性是后者的 6 倍。拥有/可能拥有品牌商品的青少年每周使用大麻的可能性几乎是其他青少年的 23 倍,有最喜爱品牌的青少年每周使用大麻的可能性是其他青少年的 3 倍,出现 CUD 的可能性是其他青少年的 3 倍。很少/有时在 Instagram 上看到促销活动的青少年每周使用大麻的可能性降低 85%,而经常/总是看到的青少年每周使用大麻的可能性降低 93%。
大麻企业推销产品的方式,尤其是品牌塑造,可能会影响青少年使用大麻的模式。未来的研究应该在纵向设计中检验这些关联是否持续存在。在此期间,各州应考虑采取一种为青少年提供更多保护,使其免受大麻营销影响的方法。