• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理市场中的定价行为:来自家庭护理服务机构层面数据的证据

Pricing behavior in long term care markets: evidence from provider-level data for home help services.

作者信息

van Eijkel Remco, Kattenberg Mark, van der Torre Ab

机构信息

SEO Amsterdam Economics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Health Econ Manag. 2023 Mar;23(1):59-83. doi: 10.1007/s10754-022-09334-9. Epub 2022 May 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10754-022-09334-9
PMID:35622262
Abstract

Exploiting a rich data set on the Dutch market for home help services, we find that larger providers obtain a higher price than do small providers. However, compared to other studies on market power in care markets this price difference is considered small to moderate. Our identification strategy relies on the exogenous variation in market shares in January'07, the very first month after home help was decentralized to municipalities. Zooming in on our main outcome, we obtain that the small but significant effect of market size on price is merely driven by the pricing behavior of for-profit providers.

摘要

利用荷兰家庭帮助服务市场的丰富数据集,我们发现较大的供应商比较小的供应商获得更高的价格。然而,与其他关于护理市场市场力量的研究相比,这种价格差异被认为是小到中等的。我们的识别策略依赖于2007年1月(家庭帮助服务下放到各市后的第一个月)市场份额的外生变化。深入研究我们的主要结果,我们发现市场规模对价格的微小但显著的影响仅仅是由营利性供应商的定价行为驱动的。

相似文献

1
Pricing behavior in long term care markets: evidence from provider-level data for home help services.长期护理市场中的定价行为:来自家庭护理服务机构层面数据的证据
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2023 Mar;23(1):59-83. doi: 10.1007/s10754-022-09334-9. Epub 2022 May 27.
2
Hospital pricing: cost shifting and competition.医院定价:成本转嫁与竞争。
EBRI Issue Brief. 1993 May(137):1-17.
3
Factors affecting the entry of for-profit providers into a price regulated market for formal long-term care services: a case study from Japan.影响营利性供应商进入正式长期护理服务价格管制市场的因素:来自日本的案例研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan;76(1):143-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.018. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
4
Public health care providers and market competition: the case of Finnish occupational health services.公共医疗保健提供者和市场竞争:芬兰职业健康服务案例。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Feb;12(1):3-16. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0217-7. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
5
Optimal price regulations in international pharmaceutical markets with generic competition.具有仿制药竞争的国际药品市场中的最优价格规制。
J Health Econ. 2020 May;71:102315. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102315. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
6
Pricing behaviour of nonprofit insurers in a weakly competitive social health insurance market.非营利保险公司在弱竞争社会医疗保险市场中的定价行为。
J Health Econ. 2011 Mar;30(2):439-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
7
Switching costs in competitive health insurance markets: The role of insurers' pricing strategies.竞争型医疗保险市场中的转换成本:保险公司定价策略的作用。
Health Econ. 2020 Sep;29(9):992-1012. doi: 10.1002/hec.4111. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
8
Market competition, ownership, payment systems and the performance of health care providers - a panel study among Finnish occupational health services providers.市场竞争、所有制、支付制度与医疗机构绩效——芬兰职业健康服务提供商的面板研究。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Oct;8(4):477-510. doi: 10.1017/S174413311200031X. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
9
Competitive pricing within pharmaceutical classes: evidence on "follow-on" drugs in Germany 1993-2008.药品类内的竞争定价:德国 1993-2008 年“仿制药”的证据
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;16(1):73-82. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0555-3. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
10
Impact of European pharmaceutical price regulation on generic price competition: a review.欧洲药品价格管制对仿制药价格竞争的影响:综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(8):649-63. doi: 10.2165/11535360-000000000-00000.

本文引用的文献

1
Substitute services: a barrier to controlling long-term care expenditures.替代服务:控制长期护理支出的一个障碍。
Eur J Ageing. 2020 Jun 11;18(1):85-97. doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00570-x. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Does Hospital Competition Save Lives? Evidence from the English NHS Patient Choice Reforms.医院竞争能挽救生命吗?来自英国国民医疗服务体系患者选择改革的证据。
Econ J (London). 2011 Aug;121(554):F228-F260. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02449.x.
3
Practice patterns among entrants and incumbents in the home health market after the prospective payment system was implemented.
前瞻性支付系统实施后家庭健康市场新进入者和现有从业者的执业模式。
Health Econ. 2015 Mar;24 Suppl 1:118-31. doi: 10.1002/hec.3147.
4
The impact of competition on quality and prices in the English care homes market.竞争对英国养老院市场质量和价格的影响。
J Health Econ. 2014 Mar;34(100):73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
5
Competition and quality in home health care markets.家庭医疗保健市场中的竞争与质量
Health Econ. 2014 Mar;23(3):298-313. doi: 10.1002/hec.2938. Epub 2013 May 14.
6
The effects of multi-hospital systems on hospital prices.多医院系统对医院价格的影响。
J Health Econ. 2007 Mar 1;26(2):400-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.002. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
7
It's the prices, stupid: why the United States is so different from other countries.关键在于价格,笨蛋:美国为何与其他国家如此不同。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 May-Jun;22(3):89-105. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.3.89.
8
Competitive spillovers across non-profit and for-profit nursing homes.非营利性和营利性养老院之间的竞争溢出效应。
J Health Econ. 2003 Jan;22(1):1-22. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00093-0.
9
Asymmetric information, ownership and quality of care: an empirical analysis of nursing homes.信息不对称、所有权与护理质量:养老院的实证分析
J Health Econ. 2002 Mar;21(2):293-311. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00123-0.
10
A job profile of home helps in the Netherlands.荷兰家庭帮佣的工作概况。
Health Soc Care Community. 1998 Nov;6(6):397-406. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.1998.00151.x.