Rodríguez-Hernández Pablo, Simões João, Arce Cristina, Díaz-Gaona Cipriano, López-Fariñas María Dolores, Sánchez-Rodríguez Manuel, Rodríguez-Estévez Vicente
Department of Animal Production, International Agrifood Campus of Excellence (ceiA3), Campus de Rabanales, University of Cordoba (UCO), 14071 Córdoba, Spain.
Veterinary and Animal Research Centre (CECAV), Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), Department of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
Vet Sci. 2022 Apr 30;9(5):219. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9050219.
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the production system and other environmental/phenotype factors on age at first kidding (AFK), kidding interval (KI) and prolificacy of 19,772 Florida goats reared between 2000 and 2019 on 49 dairy farms (38 farms intensively managed and 11 extensively managed with grazing). AFK was lower on intensive (490.2 ± 0.9 days; n = 13,345) than on extensive farms (511.7 ± 2.5 days; n = 2357; p < 0.001), and highest during the spring season (533.9 ± 2.7 days; n = 1932; p < 0.001) in both production systems. The average KI was 355.7 ± 0.4 days, mainly varying according to dry period, kidding season and lactation number and kidding type (p < 0.01). A significant interaction between production system, kidding season and dry period was observed with the highest AFK on intensive farms during spring and summer for goats presenting a dry period of up to six months. The overall prolificacy (1.64 ± 0.01) increased in recent years in both systems, and it was affected by the production system, but with different patterns; so, the highest prolificacy of primiparous and multiparous goats was observed on extensive and intensive farms, respectively. Besides that, the prolificacy and other reproductive parameters, such as AFK, significantly increased in the last decade, which could be related to management improvements. Besides that, the existence of inter-annual variations should be considered to compare data between farms and years, and to establish the farms’ objectives according to their production systems and production goals.
本研究的主要目的是评估生产系统及其他环境/表型因素对2000年至2019年间在49个奶牛场(38个集约化管理农场和11个粗放式放牧管理农场)饲养的19,772只佛罗里达山羊初产年龄(AFK)、产羔间隔(KI)和繁殖力的影响。集约化农场的AFK(490.2±0.9天;n = 13,345)低于粗放式农场(511.7±2.5天;n = 2357;p < 0.001),且在两个生产系统中,春季的AFK最高(533.9±2.7天;n = 1932;p < 0.001)。平均KI为355.7±0.4天,主要因干奶期、产羔季节、产羔次数和产羔类型而异(p < 0.01)。观察到生产系统、产羔季节和干奶期之间存在显著交互作用,对于干奶期长达6个月的山羊,集约化农场在春季和夏季的AFK最高。近年来,两个系统的总体繁殖力(1.64±0.01)均有所提高,且受生产系统影响,但模式不同;因此,初产山羊和经产山羊的最高繁殖力分别在粗放式农场和集约化农场观察到。除此之外,繁殖力和其他繁殖参数,如AFK,在过去十年中显著增加,这可能与管理改善有关。除此之外,应考虑年际变化的存在,以便比较不同农场和年份的数据,并根据农场的生产系统和生产目标确定农场目标。