• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在多专业肥胖管理决策中,注意义务优于功利主义。

Duty of care trumps utilitarianism in multi-professional obesity management decisions.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, 42259Ulster University - Jordanstown Campus, Newtownabbey, UK.

Department of Nursing, 2596Ulster University - Coleraine Campus, Coleraine, UK.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2022 Sep;29(6):1401-1414. doi: 10.1177/09697330221075764. Epub 2022 May 27.

DOI:10.1177/09697330221075764
PMID:35623624
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9527366/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Escalating levels of obesity place enormous and growing demands on Health care provision in the (U.K.) United Kingdom. Resources are limited with increasing and competing demands upon them. Ethical considerations underpin clinical decision making generally, but there is limited evidence regarding the relationship between these variables particularly in terms of treating individuals with obesity.

RESEARCH AIM

To investigate the views of National Health Service (NHS) clinicians on navigating the ethical challenges and decision making associated with obesity management in adults with chronic illness.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A cross-sectional, multi-site survey distributed electronically.

PARTICIPANTS

A consensus sample of nurses, doctors, dietitians and final year students in two NHS Trusts and two Universities.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Ethical and governance approvals obtained from a National Ethics Committee (11NIR035), two universities and two teaching hospitals.

RESULTS

Of the total ( = 395) participants, the majority were nurses (48%), female (79%) and qualified clinicians (59%). Participants strongly considered the individual to have primary responsibility for a healthy weight and an obligation to attempt to maintain that healthy weight if they wish to access NHS care. Yet two thirds would not withhold treatment for patients with obesity.

DISCUSSION

While clinicians were clear about patient responsibility and obligations, the majority prioritised their duty of care and would not invoke a utilitarian approach to decision making. This may reflect awareness of obesity as a multi-faceted entity, with responsibility for support and management shared amongst society in general.

CONCLUSIONS

The attitudes of this sample of clinicians complemented the concept of the health service as being built on a principle of community, with each treated according to their need. However limited resources challenge the concept of needs-based decisions consequently societal engagement is necessary to agree a pragmatic way forward.

摘要

背景

肥胖水平的不断上升给英国的医疗保健服务带来了巨大且日益增长的需求。资源有限,而对其的需求却在不断增加且竞争激烈。伦理考虑通常是临床决策的基础,但关于这些变量之间的关系,特别是在治疗肥胖个体方面,证据有限。

研究目的

调查英国国民健康服务(NHS)临床医生在处理与慢性疾病成人肥胖管理相关的伦理挑战和决策时的观点。

研究设计

一项横断面、多地点的电子调查。

参与者

来自两个 NHS 信托基金和两所大学的护士、医生、营养师和最后一年学生的共识样本。

伦理考虑

从一个国家伦理委员会(11NIR035)、两所大学和两所教学医院获得了伦理和治理批准。

结果

在总共(=395)名参与者中,大多数是护士(48%)、女性(79%)和合格的临床医生(59%)。参与者强烈认为个人对健康体重负有主要责任,如果他们希望获得 NHS 护理,有义务尝试维持健康体重。然而,三分之二的人不会拒绝为肥胖患者提供治疗。

讨论

虽然临床医生清楚患者的责任和义务,但大多数人优先考虑他们的护理责任,不会对决策采取功利主义的方法。这可能反映了他们对肥胖作为一个多方面实体的认识,支持和管理的责任由整个社会共同承担。

结论

该临床医生样本的态度补充了健康服务基于社区原则的概念,每个患者都根据他们的需求得到治疗。然而,有限的资源挑战了基于需求的决策的概念,因此需要社会参与来达成一个实际可行的前进道路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/738d/9527366/d2c764a1558a/10.1177_09697330221075764-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/738d/9527366/d2c764a1558a/10.1177_09697330221075764-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/738d/9527366/d2c764a1558a/10.1177_09697330221075764-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Duty of care trumps utilitarianism in multi-professional obesity management decisions.在多专业肥胖管理决策中,注意义务优于功利主义。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Sep;29(6):1401-1414. doi: 10.1177/09697330221075764. Epub 2022 May 27.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Is patient involvement possible when decisions involve scarce resources? A qualitative study of decision-making in primary care.当决策涉及稀缺资源时,患者参与是否可行?一项关于初级医疗中决策制定的定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jul;59(1):93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.007.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
8
[Ethical aspects of overdiagnosis: Between the utilitarianism and the ethics of responsibility].[过度诊断的伦理问题:介于功利主义与责任伦理之间]
Aten Primaria. 2018 Nov;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.07.007.
9
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Telemedicine Nursing Interventions in the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.远程医疗护理干预对成人超重和肥胖管理的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Curr Obes Rep. 2025 Jul 30;14(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s13679-025-00655-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Obesity and COVID-19: Blame isn't a strategy.肥胖与新冠疫情:指责并非解决之道。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Sep;8(9):731. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30274-6. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
2
Covid-19: England's obesity strategy will fail without tackling social factors, warn doctors.新冠疫情:医生警告称,若不解决社会因素问题,英国的肥胖战略将失败。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 27;370:m2994. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2994.
3
Proning reduces ventilation heterogeneity in patients with elevated BMI: implications for COVID-19 pneumonia management?俯卧位可降低体重指数升高患者的通气不均一性:对新型冠状病毒肺炎管理有何启示?
ERJ Open Res. 2020 Jul 13;6(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00292-2020. eCollection 2020 Apr.
4
Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study.纽约市 5279 例 2019 年冠状病毒病患者住院和重症的相关因素:前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 May 22;369:m1966. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1966.
5
Accountability for an unhealthy lifestyle.对不健康生活方式负责。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Apr;22(3):351-355. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01192-x.
6
Obesity is Associated with Severe Forms of COVID-19.肥胖与重症新型冠状病毒肺炎相关。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020 Jul;28(7):1175. doi: 10.1002/oby.22842. Epub 2020 May 21.
7
[Clinical characteristics and outcomes of 112 cardiovascular disease patients infected by 2019-nCoV].112例2019新型冠状病毒感染心血管疾病患者的临床特征与结局
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 24;48(6):450-455. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200220-00105.
8
A comprehensive diagnostic approach to detect underlying causes of obesity in adults.一种全面的诊断方法,用于检测成年人肥胖的潜在原因。
Obes Rev. 2019 Jun;20(6):795-804. doi: 10.1111/obr.12836. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
9
Ethics of Incongruity: moral tension generators in clinical medicine.伦理冲突:临床医学中的道德紧张源
J Med Ethics. 2019 Apr;45(4):244-248. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105161. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
10
A hands-on guide to doing content analysis.内容分析实践指南。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 21.