• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为协同消费的食物共享概念框架。

A Conceptual Framework for Food Sharing as Collaborative Consumption.

作者信息

Octavia Damayanti, Nasution Reza Ashari, Yudoko Gatot

机构信息

School of Business Management ITB, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia.

School of Economic and Business, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia.

出版信息

Foods. 2022 May 13;11(10):1422. doi: 10.3390/foods11101422.

DOI:10.3390/foods11101422
PMID:35626993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9141114/
Abstract

Food waste has increased significantly and become a global issue amidst a growing concern regarding famine in several countries. Food sharing constitutes the solution to the problem provided an appropriate framework is developed that guides its application. The sharing economy was touted as the appropriate framework, yet it is excessively macroscopic to be able to capture the dynamics of food sharing activities. A microscopic framework is required to overcome this problem, the concept of collaborative consumption with its focus on activity level being one potential solution. However, an investigation into how food sharing activities can be viewed as collaborative consumption should be completed. This paper presents an analysis of the relationship between food sharing activities and collaborative consumption. The authors employed a systematic literature review conducted by meta-analysis and content analysis to identify the commonalities between the two and the theories underlying them. The result is a conceptual framework of food sharing activities as a collaborative consumption practice. The framework highlights eight propositions that can explain the intention, performance, and continuity of food sharing activities. At the end of the paper, the authors outline the theoretical and managerial contributions and recommend future research activities.

摘要

在一些国家对饥荒的担忧日益加剧的背景下,食物浪费显著增加并成为一个全球性问题。如果能建立一个指导食物共享应用的适当框架,那么食物共享就是解决这一问题的办法。共享经济曾被吹捧为合适的框架,但它过于宏观,无法捕捉食物共享活动的动态。需要一个微观框架来克服这一问题,以活动水平为重点的协同消费概念是一个潜在的解决方案。然而,应该完成一项关于如何将食物共享活动视为协同消费的调查。本文对食物共享活动与协同消费之间的关系进行了分析。作者采用了通过元分析和内容分析进行的系统文献综述,以确定两者之间的共性及其背后的理论。结果是一个将食物共享活动作为协同消费实践的概念框架。该框架突出了八个命题,这些命题可以解释食物共享活动的意图、表现和持续性。在论文结尾,作者概述了理论和管理方面的贡献,并推荐了未来的研究活动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96c7/9141114/f822a95969ab/foods-11-01422-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96c7/9141114/c0fc36a14893/foods-11-01422-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96c7/9141114/c74de5da4086/foods-11-01422-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96c7/9141114/aa89d22c0f79/foods-11-01422-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96c7/9141114/57981ec514a8/foods-11-01422-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96c7/9141114/f822a95969ab/foods-11-01422-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96c7/9141114/c0fc36a14893/foods-11-01422-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96c7/9141114/c74de5da4086/foods-11-01422-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96c7/9141114/aa89d22c0f79/foods-11-01422-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96c7/9141114/57981ec514a8/foods-11-01422-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96c7/9141114/f822a95969ab/foods-11-01422-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A Conceptual Framework for Food Sharing as Collaborative Consumption.作为协同消费的食物共享概念框架。
Foods. 2022 May 13;11(10):1422. doi: 10.3390/foods11101422.
2
Providers' Initial Trust on an Organization-Sponsored Sharing Platform: The Framing of Coworker Collaborative Consumption.提供者对组织赞助的共享平台的初始信任:同事协作消费的框架
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 8;11:2174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02174. eCollection 2020.
3
Conceptual framework for the study of food waste generation and prevention in the hospitality sector.酒店业食物浪费产生与预防研究的概念框架。
Waste Manag. 2016 Mar;49:326-336. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
SHARE IT: Co-designing a sustainability impact assessment framework for urban food sharing initiatives.分享它:共同设计城市食物分享倡议的可持续性影响评估框架。
Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2019 Nov;79:106300. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106300.
6
Flip a coin: Collaborative consumption or Sharing Economy in Ophthalmology services.抛硬币:眼科服务中的协作消费或共享经济。
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct-Dec;65(4):335-338. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2021.68.
7
Social and ecological approaches in urban interfaces: A sharing economy management framework.社会与生态方法在城市界面的应用:共享经济管理框架。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 15;713:134407. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134407. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
8
Sharing Channel Strategy With Customers' Collaborative Consumption Behaviors.与客户协同消费行为的共享渠道策略。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 28;13:792704. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792704. eCollection 2022.
9
How do sharing organisations create and disrupt institutions? Towards a framework for institutional work in the sharing economy.共享组织如何创建和颠覆制度?迈向共享经济中制度工作的框架。
J Clean Prod. 2019 May 10;219:667-676. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.057.
10
Is the Meaning of the "Sharing Economy" Shared Among Us? Comparing the Perspectives of Japanese and Swedish Researchers.“共享经济”的含义在我们之间是共享的吗?比较日本和瑞典研究者的观点。
Rev Socionetwork Strateg. 2021;15(1):87-106. doi: 10.1007/s12626-021-00068-7. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Eco-Inefficiency Formula: A Method to Verify the Cost of the Economic, Environmental, and Social Impact of Waste in Food Services.生态无效率公式:一种验证食品服务中废弃物的经济、环境和社会影响成本的方法。
Foods. 2021 Jun 13;10(6):1369. doi: 10.3390/foods10061369.
2
Food Waste and Nutrition Quality in the Context of Public Health: A Scoping Review.**标题**:公共卫生视角下的食物浪费与营养质量:范围综述 **摘要**:食物浪费与营养质量之间的关系是一个日益受到关注的问题,尤其是在公共卫生领域。本研究旨在对相关文献进行全面梳理,以了解食物浪费对营养质量的影响。采用 scoping review 方法,对 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 数据库进行检索,纳入 2000 年至 2023 年期间发表的英文文献。通过筛选,最终纳入 29 篇文献。结果表明,食物浪费对营养质量有负面影响,尤其是在发展中国家。减少食物浪费可以改善营养质量,并对公共卫生具有重要意义。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 18;18(10):5379. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105379.
3
Research productivity in the field of physical exercise and epilepsy: A bibliometric analysis of the scholarly literature with qualitative synthesis.体力活动与癫痫领域的研究产出:学术文献的文献计量分析及定性综合。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Aug;121(Pt A):108058. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108058. Epub 2021 May 28.
4
A cross-cultural study of beliefs about the influence of food sharing on interpersonal relationships and food choices.跨文化研究食物分享对人际关系和食物选择的影响的观念。
Appetite. 2021 Jun 1;161:105129. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105129. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Social eating initiatives and the practices of commensality.社交性进食倡议和共餐实践。
Appetite. 2021 Jun 1;161:105107. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105107. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
Food Acquisition Behaviors and Perceptions of Food Pantry Use among Food Pantry Clients in Rural Appalachia.农村阿巴拉契亚地区食品储藏室客户的食物获取行为和对食品储藏室使用的看法。
Ecol Food Nutr. 2021 Jan-Feb;60(1):70-88. doi: 10.1080/03670244.2020.1793138. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
7
Food insecurity among formerly homeless youth in supportive housing: A social-ecological analysis of a structural intervention.保障性住房中曾经无家可归的青年的粮食不安全问题:一项结构干预的社会生态分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112724. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112724. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
8
Data of collaborative consumption in online food delivery services.在线食品配送服务中的协同消费数据。
Data Brief. 2019 May 23;25:104007. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104007. eCollection 2019 Aug.
9
Quantifying the relationship between food sharing practices and socio-ecological variables in small-scale societies: A cross-cultural multi-methodological approach.量化小规模社会中食物分享实践与社会生态变量之间的关系:跨文化多方法研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 29;14(5):e0216302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216302. eCollection 2019.
10
Prioritizing the Risk Factors of Severe Early Childhood Caries.确定重度幼儿龋齿的风险因素优先级。
Dent J (Basel). 2017 Jan 6;5(1):4. doi: 10.3390/dj5010004.