• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is the Meaning of the "Sharing Economy" Shared Among Us? Comparing the Perspectives of Japanese and Swedish Researchers.“共享经济”的含义在我们之间是共享的吗?比较日本和瑞典研究者的观点。
Rev Socionetwork Strateg. 2021;15(1):87-106. doi: 10.1007/s12626-021-00068-7. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
2
A decade of the sharing economy: Concepts, users, business and governance perspectives.共享经济十年:概念、用户、商业及治理视角
J Clean Prod. 2020 Oct 1;269:122215. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122215. Epub 2020 May 20.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Political economies and environmental futures for the sharing economy.共享经济的政治经济与环境未来。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2017 Jun 13;375(2095). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0367.
5
Flip a coin: Collaborative consumption or Sharing Economy in Ophthalmology services.抛硬币:眼科服务中的协作消费或共享经济。
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct-Dec;65(4):335-338. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2021.68.
6
Sharing economy business models for sustainability.共享经济商业模式促进可持续发展。
J Clean Prod. 2020 Sep 1;266:121519. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121519.
7
An international collaborative study comparing Swedish and Japanese nurses' reactions to elder abuse.一项国际合作研究比较了瑞典和日本护士对虐待老人的反应。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jan;68(1):56-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05712.x. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
8
A Conceptual Framework for Food Sharing as Collaborative Consumption.作为协同消费的食物共享概念框架。
Foods. 2022 May 13;11(10):1422. doi: 10.3390/foods11101422.
9
Fashion platform operations in the sharing economy with digital technologies: recent development and real case studies.数字技术赋能共享经济中的时尚平台运营:最新发展与实际案例研究
Ann Oper Res. 2022 Jan 28:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04544-3.
10
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the disruptiveness of the sharing economy at the individual consumer level: How consumer reflexivity drives re-engagement in sharing.在个体消费者层面探究共享经济的颠覆性:消费者反思性如何推动重新参与共享。
J Acad Mark Sci. 2023 Mar 11:1-32. doi: 10.1007/s11747-023-00926-6.

“共享经济”的含义在我们之间是共享的吗?比较日本和瑞典研究者的观点。

Is the Meaning of the "Sharing Economy" Shared Among Us? Comparing the Perspectives of Japanese and Swedish Researchers.

作者信息

Majima Takashi, Fors Per, Inutsuka Yu, Orito Yohko

机构信息

Senshu University, Kawasaki, Japan.

Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Rev Socionetwork Strateg. 2021;15(1):87-106. doi: 10.1007/s12626-021-00068-7. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s12626-021-00068-7
PMID:35505898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7897734/
Abstract

In this paper, we aim to investigate how researchers in Japan and Sweden perceive and approach the term "sharing economy" in research publications. Systematic literature reviews were used to explore academic discussions in both countries. The main finding of this research is that although researchers in both contexts use similar definitions and concepts, the meanings and connotations of the sharing economy differ among the two contexts. In summary, Japanese researchers tend to focus first and foremost on the economic effects of the sharing economy, as it serves the purpose of economic revitalisation. In contrast, Swedish researchers focus on its environmental effects. The differences reflect country-specific socio-cultural, technological, and economic contexts. Finally, we suggest future directions for research and policy development.

摘要

在本文中,我们旨在研究日本和瑞典的研究人员如何在研究出版物中理解和运用“共享经济”这一术语。我们采用系统的文献综述来探究这两个国家的学术讨论情况。这项研究的主要发现是,尽管两国研究人员使用了相似的定义和概念,但共享经济在这两种背景下的含义和内涵有所不同。总之,日本研究人员往往首先关注共享经济的经济效应,因为它服务于经济振兴的目的。相比之下,瑞典研究人员则关注其环境效应。这些差异反映了两国特定的社会文化、技术和经济背景。最后,我们提出了未来研究和政策发展的方向。