• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解创新效率对中国城市生态足迹的异质影响。

Understanding the Heterogeneous Impact of Innovation Efficiency on Urban Ecological Footprint in China.

机构信息

Nanyang Institute of Technology, Fanli Business School, Nanyang 473000, China.

Institute of Central China Development, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 16;19(10):6054. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106054.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19106054
PMID:35627591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9140786/
Abstract

Under the background of tightening resource constraints and a deteriorating ecological environment, innovation is aimed at saving energy, reducing consumption, abating pollution and achieving sustainable economic growth. This has gradually become an important way to improve industrial structure, competitiveness and environmental performance worldwide. In this study, we use the super-efficiency SBM model to calculate the innovation efficiency of 283 cities in China from 2009 to 2019. Then, based on the dynamic threshold regression model, we explore the impact of innovation efficiency on ecological footprint in innovative cities or non-innovative cities under different economic development levels. The main conclusions that can be drawn are as follows. (1) Within the research period, the influence of innovation efficiency on ecological footprint in China shows a negative double threshold feature, that is, increasing regional innovation efficiency has an inhibitory effect on ecological footprint. (2) For innovative cities, innovation efficiency has a strong inhibitory effect on ecological footprint, and it becomes stronger and stronger with the growth of night light data; but this inhibitory effect is gradually decreasing with improvement of economic development level in non-innovative cities. (3) Under the threshold of different levels of economic development, the number of scientific human resources, scientific financial resources, scientific information resources and scientific papers has a positive effect on ecological footprint, while the number of patent applications has a negative effect on ecological footprint.

摘要

在资源约束趋紧、生态环境恶化的背景下,创新旨在节约能源、减少消耗、减轻污染,实现经济的可持续增长。这逐渐成为全球范围内改善产业结构、竞争力和环境绩效的重要途径。在本研究中,我们使用超效率 SBM 模型来计算 2009 年至 2019 年中国 283 个城市的创新效率。然后,基于动态门槛回归模型,我们探讨了创新效率对创新城市或不同经济发展水平的非创新城市的生态足迹的影响。主要结论如下。(1)在研究期间,创新效率对中国生态足迹的影响呈现出负的双重门槛特征,即增加区域创新效率对生态足迹具有抑制作用。(2)对于创新城市,创新效率对生态足迹具有很强的抑制作用,并且随着夜光数据的增长而变得越来越强;但在非创新城市中,随着经济发展水平的提高,这种抑制作用逐渐减弱。(3)在不同经济发展水平的门槛下,科学人力资源、科学财力、科学信息资源和科学论文数量对生态足迹有正向影响,而专利申请数量对生态足迹有负向影响。

相似文献

1
Understanding the Heterogeneous Impact of Innovation Efficiency on Urban Ecological Footprint in China.理解创新效率对中国城市生态足迹的异质影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 16;19(10):6054. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106054.
2
Does Innovation Efficiency Suppress the Ecological Footprint? Empirical Evidence from 280 Chinese Cities.创新效率是否抑制了生态足迹?来自中国 280 个城市的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;17(18):6826. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186826.
3
Dynamic Threshold Effect of Directed Technical Change Suppress on Urban Carbon Footprint in China.定向技术变革抑制对中国城市碳足迹的动态阈值效应
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 23;19(9):5151. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095151.
4
Can collaborative innovation constrain ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China.协同创新能否抑制生态足迹?来自中国粤港澳大湾区的实证证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(36):54476-54491. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19648-3. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
5
Research on the impact of energy technology innovation on total factor ecological efficiency.研究能源技术创新对全要素生态效率的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(24):37096-37114. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18204-9. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
6
Impact of technological innovation and industrial-structure upgrades on ecological efficiency in China in terms of spatial spillover and the threshold effect.从空间溢出和门槛效应看技术创新和产业结构升级对中国生态效率的影响。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Jul;17(4):852-865. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4381. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
7
Spatio-Econometric Analysis of Urban Land Use Efficiency in China from the Perspective of Natural Resources Input and Undesirable Outputs: A Case Study of 287 Cities in China.中国自然资源投入与非期望产出视角下的城市土地利用效率的空间计量分析——以中国 287 个城市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 6;17(19):7297. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197297.
8
Sustainable evaluation of the eco-economic systems in the π-shaped Curve Area of the Yellow River basin of China: a study based on the 3D ecological footprint model.中国黄河流域“π”型曲线区生态经济系统的可持续评价:基于三维生态足迹模型的研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(50):75921-75935. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20948-x. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
9
Dynamic decomposition and regional differences of urban emergy ecological footprint in the Yangtze River Delta.长三角城市能值生态足迹的动态分解与区域差异。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 15;326(Pt B):116698. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116698. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
10
Environmental Regulation, Financial Pressure and Industrial Ecological Efficiency of Resource-Based Cities in China: Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Impact Mechanism.中国资源型城市环境规制、金融压力与工业生态效率:时空特征与作用机制
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 4;19(17):11079. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711079.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the impact of international trade on ecological footprint in Belt and Road Initiative countries.评估国际贸易对“一带一路”倡议国家生态足迹的影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 16;10(4):e26459. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26459. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Remittance inflows affect the ecological footprint in BICS countries: do technological innovation and financial development matter?汇款流入对BICS国家的生态足迹有影响:技术创新和金融发展重要吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(18):23482-23500. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12400-3. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
Technological innovation, financialization, and ecological footprint: evidence from BEM economies.技术创新、金融化与生态足迹:BEM 经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(17):21991-22001. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11845-2. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
3
Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries.技术创新、金融发展、可再生能源与生态足迹的动态关系:基于亚太经合组织国家 STIRPAT 模型的新见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(12):15519-15536. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11640-z. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
4
Impact of population growth.人口增长的影响。
Science. 1971 Mar 26;171(3977):1212-7. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3977.1212.