• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

汇款流入对BICS国家的生态足迹有影响:技术创新和金融发展重要吗?

Remittance inflows affect the ecological footprint in BICS countries: do technological innovation and financial development matter?

作者信息

Yang Bo, Jahanger Atif, Ali Minhaj

机构信息

School of Economics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, 430073, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(18):23482-23500. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12400-3. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-12400-3
PMID:33449318
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7809096/
Abstract

This study examines the impact of remittance inflows, technological innovations, and financial development on environmental quality in Brazil, India, China, and South Africa (BICS) economies over 1990-2016. This study employed a comprehensive environment proxy, i.e., ecological footprint for environmental quality, and also considers more advanced and robust econometric (second-generation) techniques. The outcomes of the current study reveal that remittance inflows and financial development significantly deteriorate the environmental quality, while technological innovations are an essential factor for the reduction of ecological footprint level. Furthermore, the results of the interaction terms show a significantly adverse effect on the ecological footprint. Additionally, the findings of country-wise analysis reveal that remittance inflows and financial development worsen the environmental quality in each sample country, while the technological innovations promote the environmental sustainability that is steady with panel results. Besides, the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis was verified across the BICS economies. Consistent with the key findings, an inverted U-shaped relationship exists between economic growth and ecological footprint in the case of Brazil and South Africa. In contrast, the U-shaped EKC hypothesis exists in the case of China and India. For robust policy implication, the findings of this study highlighted the dire need for "green policy tools" that should be linked with the BICS economy policies and driver for sustained growth.

摘要

本研究考察了1990 - 2016年期间,汇款流入、技术创新和金融发展对巴西、印度、中国和南非(BICS)经济体环境质量的影响。本研究采用了一个综合的环境指标,即用于衡量环境质量的生态足迹,并且还考虑了更先进、更稳健的计量经济学(第二代)技术。当前研究的结果表明,汇款流入和金融发展显著恶化了环境质量,而技术创新是降低生态足迹水平的关键因素。此外,交互项的结果显示对生态足迹有显著的不利影响。另外,国别分析的结果表明,汇款流入和金融发展在每个样本国家都使环境质量恶化,而技术创新促进了环境可持续性,这与面板结果一致。此外,在BICS经济体中验证了环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)假说。与主要研究结果一致,在巴西和南非的案例中,经济增长与生态足迹之间存在倒U形关系。相比之下,在中国和印度的案例中存在U形EKC假说。为了得出有力的政策启示,本研究的结果强调了对“绿色政策工具”的迫切需求,这些工具应与BICS经济体政策以及持续增长的驱动因素相联系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fd/7809096/9f08042ed95a/11356_2021_12400_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fd/7809096/c027a389b587/11356_2021_12400_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fd/7809096/5942947957f8/11356_2021_12400_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fd/7809096/b46b85642e66/11356_2021_12400_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fd/7809096/9f08042ed95a/11356_2021_12400_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fd/7809096/c027a389b587/11356_2021_12400_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fd/7809096/5942947957f8/11356_2021_12400_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fd/7809096/b46b85642e66/11356_2021_12400_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fd/7809096/9f08042ed95a/11356_2021_12400_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Remittance inflows affect the ecological footprint in BICS countries: do technological innovation and financial development matter?汇款流入对BICS国家的生态足迹有影响:技术创新和金融发展重要吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(18):23482-23500. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12400-3. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
The Dynamic Impact of Natural Resource Rents, Financial Development, and Technological Innovations on Environmental Quality: Empirical Evidence from BRI Economies.自然资源租金、金融发展和技术创新对环境质量的动态影响:来自“一带一路”经济体的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010130.
3
The role of remittance inflow and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in the environment: Accounting ecological footprint indicator for top remittance-receiving countries.汇款流入、可再生和不可再生能源消费在环境中的作用:对顶级汇款接收国的生态足迹指标进行核算。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(11):15915-15930. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16545-z. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
4
Heterogeneous effects of remittances and institutional quality in reducing environmental deficit in the presence of EKC hypothesis: A global study with the application of panel quantile regression.在环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)假说存在的情况下,汇款与制度质量对减少环境赤字的异质性影响:一项运用面板分位数回归的全球研究
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jul;28(28):37292-37310. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13216-x. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
5
The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries.金融开放、贸易开放和能源强度对生态足迹的影响:重新审视金砖国家的环境库兹涅茨曲线假说。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(34):43233-43245. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10238-9. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
6
Exploring the interactive effects of environmental quality and financial development in top ten remittance-receiving countries: do technological effect matter?探究十大汇款接收国环境质量和金融发展的交互影响:技术效应是否重要?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(19):56930-56945. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26256-2. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
7
Revisiting the nexus between digital trade, green technological innovation, and environmental sustainability in BRICS economies.审视金砖国家经济体中数字贸易、绿色技术创新与环境可持续性之间的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(6):8585-8607. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31661-8. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
8
The role of technological innovation and diffusion, energy consumption and financial development in affecting ecological footprint in BRICS: an empirical analysis.技术创新与扩散、能源消耗和金融发展对金砖国家生态足迹的影响:实证分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(17):25318-25335. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17734-6. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
9
Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries.技术创新、金融发展、可再生能源与生态足迹的动态关系:基于亚太经合组织国家 STIRPAT 模型的新见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(12):15519-15536. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11640-z. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
10
Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: do human capital and biocapacity matter?中东欧国家金融发展、能源消耗、收入水平与生态足迹的关系:人力资本和生物承载力重要吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(31):31856-31872. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06343-z. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling the Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Energy Poverty: Do Energy Efficiency and Technological Innovation Matter?财政分权对能源贫困的影响建模:能源效率和技术创新是否重要?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4360. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054360.
2
Revisiting the nexus between fiscal decentralization and CO emissions in South Africa: fresh policy insights.重新审视南非财政分权与碳排放之间的关系:新的政策见解。
Financ Innov. 2023;9(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40854-023-00453-x. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
3
Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint.
生态足迹综合环境评估指数。
Environ Manage. 2023 Feb;71(2):465-482. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01747-z. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
4
Modeling for Insights: Does Fiscal Decentralization Impede Ecological Footprint?建模分析:财政分权是否会阻碍生态足迹?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;19(16):10146. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610146.
5
The Impact of Coordinated Development of Ecological Environment and Technological Innovation on Green Economy: Evidence from China.生态环境与技术创新协同发展对绿色经济的影响:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 7;19(12):6994. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19126994.
6
Understanding the Heterogeneous Impact of Innovation Efficiency on Urban Ecological Footprint in China.理解创新效率对中国城市生态足迹的异质影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 16;19(10):6054. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106054.
7
A Roadmap toward Achieving Sustainable Environment: Evaluating the Impact of Technological Innovation and Globalization on Load Capacity Factor.实现可持续环境的路线图:评估技术创新和全球化对负荷容量因子的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3288. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063288.