• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增长目标管理、区域竞争与城市土地绿色利用效率——来自中国的证据。

Growth Targets Management, Regional Competition and Urban Land Green Use Efficiency According to Evidence from China.

机构信息

Department of Engineering Management and Real Estate, College of City Construction, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China.

Institute of Real Estate, College of City Construction, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 20;19(10):6250. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106250.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19106250
PMID:35627786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9141933/
Abstract

Based on the panel data of 257 prefecture-level cities in China from 2010 to 2017, this paper measured urban land green use efficiency (ULGUE), incorporating undesirable outputs, via the super efficiency slack-based model (SBM). It also explored the effect, mechanism, and heterogeneity of growth targets management and regional competition on ULGUE via the time-varying gravitational spatial weight matrix and the spatial self-lagging model. The results show that growth targets management and regional competition have significant positive effects on ULGUE, and enhance the ULGUE by promoting local investment attraction, increasing innovation inputs, optimizing environmental regulations and strengthening commercial activities. Additionally, growth targets management has a more significant effect on eastern cities, non-central cities, and mature urban agglomeration, while regional competition has a more significant effect on central cities, non-central cities, and developmental urban agglomeration. Therefore, considering development as the priority, setting relatively aggressive economic growth targets and optimizing the regional competition mechanism for growth targets management can help improve the ULGUE and promote high-quality economic development in China.

摘要

基于 2010 年至 2017 年中国 257 个地级市的面板数据,本文采用超效率 slack 基准模型(SBM),纳入非期望产出,测算了城市土地绿色利用效率(ULGUE)。通过时变引力空间权重矩阵和空间自滞后模型,探讨了增长目标管理和区域竞争对 ULGUE 的影响、作用机制和异质性。结果表明,增长目标管理和区域竞争对 ULGUE 具有显著的正向影响,通过促进地方投资吸引力、增加创新投入、优化环境规制和加强商业活动,提高了 ULGUE。此外,增长目标管理对东部城市、非中心城市和成熟城市群的影响更为显著,而区域竞争对中心城市、非中心城市和发展中城市群的影响更为显著。因此,在考虑发展优先的前提下,制定相对积极的经济增长目标,优化增长目标管理的区域竞争机制,有助于提高 ULGUE,促进中国经济的高质量发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/9141933/805c249106ce/ijerph-19-06250-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/9141933/562a950cfe13/ijerph-19-06250-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/9141933/5588fa7967c7/ijerph-19-06250-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/9141933/67461a37595b/ijerph-19-06250-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/9141933/6956a14021b4/ijerph-19-06250-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/9141933/264b67aaefbf/ijerph-19-06250-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/9141933/805c249106ce/ijerph-19-06250-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/9141933/562a950cfe13/ijerph-19-06250-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/9141933/5588fa7967c7/ijerph-19-06250-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/9141933/67461a37595b/ijerph-19-06250-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/9141933/6956a14021b4/ijerph-19-06250-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/9141933/264b67aaefbf/ijerph-19-06250-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/9141933/805c249106ce/ijerph-19-06250-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Growth Targets Management, Regional Competition and Urban Land Green Use Efficiency According to Evidence from China.增长目标管理、区域竞争与城市土地绿色利用效率——来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 20;19(10):6250. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106250.
2
The Driving Mechanism of Urban Land Green Use Efficiency in China Based on the EBM Model with Undesirable Outputs and the Spatial Dubin Model.基于非期望产出的 EBM 模型和空间杜宾模型的中国城市土地绿色利用效率驱动机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10748. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710748.
3
What were the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and the influencing factors of urban land green use efficiency? A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt.城市土地绿色利用效率的时空演变特征及影响因素是什么?以长江经济带为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jun 5;195(7):806. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11413-4.
4
Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China.黄河流域中国碳排放约束下的时空城市土地绿色利用效率
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 4;19(19):12700. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912700.
5
Does the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy Improve the Urban Land Green Use Efficiency?-Investigation Based on Multi-Period Difference-in-Differences Model.低碳城市试点政策是否提高了城市土地绿色利用效率?——基于多期双重差分模型的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 2;20(3):2704. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032704.
6
Spatio-Econometric Analysis of Urban Land Use Efficiency in China from the Perspective of Natural Resources Input and Undesirable Outputs: A Case Study of 287 Cities in China.中国自然资源投入与非期望产出视角下的城市土地利用效率的空间计量分析——以中国 287 个城市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 6;17(19):7297. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197297.
7
Does emission trading system improve the urban land green use efficiency? Empirical evidence from Chinese cities.排放交易系统是否能提高城市土地绿色利用效率?来自中国城市的实证证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(58):121666-121683. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30678-3. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
8
Does digital inclusive finance affect the urban green economic efficiency? New evidence from the spatial econometric analysis of 284 cities in China.数字普惠金融是否影响城市绿色经济效率?来自中国284个城市空间计量分析的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(23):63435-63452. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26619-9. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
9
Efficiency Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Green Innovation in Chinese Resource-Based Cities: Based on SBM-Undesirable and Spatial Durbin Model.中国资源型城市绿色创新效率评价及影响因素研究——基于 SBM-undesirable 和空间杜宾模型
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 23;19(21):13772. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113772.
10
Evaluating Green Innovation Efficiency and Its Socioeconomic Factors Using a Slack-Based Measure with Environmental Undesirable Outputs.基于非期望产出的松弛测度评价绿色创新效率及其社会经济因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 7;18(24):12880. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412880.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China.黄河流域中国碳排放约束下的时空城市土地绿色利用效率
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 4;19(19):12700. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912700.

本文引用的文献

1
Does environmental regulation induce improved financial development for green technological innovation in China?环境规制是否会促使中国绿色技术创新的金融发展得到改善?
J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 15;300:113685. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113685. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
2
The effect of economic growth target constraints on green technology innovation.经济增长目标约束对绿色技术创新的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Aug 15;292:112765. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112765. Epub 2021 May 20.
3
Understanding differences in health behaviors by education.
了解不同教育程度人群的健康行为差异。
J Health Econ. 2010 Jan;29(1):1-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
4
Global consequences of land use.土地利用的全球影响。
Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):570-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1111772.