• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中口服非甾体抗炎药高风险处方的患病率:一项单中心回顾性病历审查研究

The Prevalence of High-Risk Prescribing of Oral Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Primary Healthcare: A Single-Centre Retrospective Chart Review Study.

作者信息

Assiri Ghadah Asaad, Alanazi Bashayr Mohammed, AlRuthia Yazed

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 7;10(5):867. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050867.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare10050867
PMID:35628004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9142064/
Abstract

The quality and safety of prescribed drugs can be assessed using prescribing safety indicators (PSIs). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of PSIs of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at primary care clinics of a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia and to identify the risk factors associated with positive PSIs for patients. In this retrospective chart review study, data from the medical records of 450 patients aged ≥18 years, who were prescribed oral NSAIDs, were reviewed and collected manually. Seven PSIs were chosen and defined as follows: prescription of an oral NSAID to any patient with a peptic ulcer; aged ≥75 years; aged ≥65 years with a glomerular filtration rate <60; heart failure; co-prescribed warfarin; co-prescribed aspirin or clopidogrel; or co-prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker and a diuretic. Patients with positive indicators are at risk of harm from high-risk prescribing. The overall period prevalence of PSIs is 153/450 (34%; 95% CI 29.60−38.39). The overall proportion of PSIs is 202/431 (46.9%; 95% CI 42.12−51.61). The most common safety indicators were for NSAIDs prescribed to patients with heart failure and patients aged ≥65 years with a glomerular filtration rate <60. The elderly and patients using polypharmacy are at increased risk of having at least one positive PSI (OR 5.22; 95% CI 3.32−8.21, p-value < 0.001 and OR 2.97; 95% CI 1.17−7.55, p-value 0.022, respectively). Patients at risk of harm from high-risk NSAID prescriptions are common in primary care. The elderly and patients on polypharmacy are at increased risk of having at least one positive PSI. Therefore, when NSAIDs are prescribed, it is recommended to weigh the benefits versus the risks for high-risk patients, such as the elderly and those with multiple-drug therapy.

摘要

可以使用处方安全指标(PSI)来评估处方药的质量和安全性。本研究旨在估算沙特阿拉伯一家三级医院基层医疗诊所口服非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的PSI患病率,并确定与患者PSI阳性相关的风险因素。在这项回顾性病历审查研究中,人工查阅并收集了450名年龄≥18岁、开具了口服NSAIDs处方的患者的病历数据。选择并定义了七个PSI如下:给任何患有消化性溃疡的患者开具口服NSAIDs处方;年龄≥75岁;年龄≥65岁且肾小球滤过率<60;心力衰竭;同时开具华法林;同时开具阿司匹林或氯吡格雷;或同时开具血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂和利尿剂。指标阳性的患者存在因高风险处方而受到伤害的风险。PSI的总体期间患病率为153/450(34%;95%置信区间29.60−38.39)。PSI的总体比例为202/431(46.9%;95%置信区间42.12−51.61)。最常见的安全指标是给心力衰竭患者以及年龄≥65岁且肾小球滤过率<60的患者开具NSAIDs处方。老年人和使用多种药物的患者至少有一项PSI阳性的风险增加(分别为OR 5.22;95%置信区间3.32−8.21,p值<0.001和OR 2.97;95%置信区间1.17−7.55,p值为0.022)。在基层医疗中,因高风险NSAIDs处方而有受到伤害风险的患者很常见。老年人和使用多种药物的患者至少有一项PSI阳性的风险增加。因此,开具NSAIDs时,建议权衡高风险患者(如老年人和接受多种药物治疗的患者)的获益与风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81e0/9142064/140919cd83a5/healthcare-10-00867-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81e0/9142064/140919cd83a5/healthcare-10-00867-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81e0/9142064/140919cd83a5/healthcare-10-00867-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Prevalence of High-Risk Prescribing of Oral Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Primary Healthcare: A Single-Centre Retrospective Chart Review Study.基层医疗中口服非甾体抗炎药高风险处方的患病率:一项单中心回顾性病历审查研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 7;10(5):867. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050867.
2
High-risk nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs prescribing in primary care: results from National Medical Care Survey Malaysia.初级保健中高危非甾体抗炎药处方:来自马来西亚国家医疗保健调查的结果。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Apr;42(2):489-499. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-00966-w. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
3
Prescription of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for elderly people in Alberta.阿尔伯塔省老年人非甾体抗炎药的处方情况。
CMAJ. 1994 Aug 1;151(3):315-22.
4
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) Use in Primary Health Care Centers in A'Seeb, Muscat: A Clinical Audit.马斯喀特阿西卜初级卫生保健中心非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的使用情况:一项临床审计
Oman Med J. 2015 Sep;30(5):366-71. doi: 10.5001/omj.2015.73.
5
Short-Course Systemic and Topical Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: Impact on Adverse Renal Events in Older Adults with Co-Morbid Disease.短期全身性和局部用非甾体抗炎药:对患有合并症的老年人不良肾脏事件的影响
Drugs Aging. 2021 Feb;38(2):147-156. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00824-4. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Estimating the economic effect of harm associated with high risk prescribing of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in England: population based cohort and economic modelling study.评估英格兰高风险处方口服非甾体抗炎药相关危害的经济影响:基于人群的队列和经济建模研究。
BMJ. 2024 Jul 24;386:e077880. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077880.
7
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Utilization Patterns and Risk of Adverse Events due to Drug-Drug Interactions among Elderly Patients: A Study from Jordan.老年患者中非甾体抗炎药的使用模式及药物相互作用导致不良事件的风险:一项来自约旦的研究。
Saudi Pharm J. 2020 Apr;28(4):504-508. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
8
The potential for interaction between warfarin and coprescribed medication: a retrospective study in primary care.华法林与联合开具药物之间的相互作用潜力:一项初级保健中的回顾性研究。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2008;8(3):207-12. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200808030-00007.
9
Underutilization of preventive strategies in patients receiving NSAIDs.非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)使用者预防策略的未充分利用。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Nov;42 Suppl 3:iii23-31. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg495.
10
Assessing prescribing of NSAIDs, antiplatelets, and anticoagulants in Canadian family medicine using chart review.通过病历审查评估加拿大全科医学中非甾体抗炎药、抗血小板药物和抗凝剂的处方情况。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Oct;38(5):1094-102. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0335-0. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Prescribing errors among adult patients in a large tertiary care system in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家大型三级保健系统中成年患者的处方错误。
Ann Saudi Med. 2021 May-Jun;41(3):147-156. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2021.147. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
2
Impact of providing patients access to electronic health records on quality and safety of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.提供患者电子健康记录访问权限对医疗质量和安全的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Dec;29(12):1019-1032. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010581. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
Development of prescribing safety indicators related to mental health disorders and medications: Modified e-Delphi study.
与精神健康障碍及药物相关的处方安全指标的制定:改良电子德尔菲研究
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jan;87(1):189-209. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14391. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications use among older adults and risk factors using the 2015 American Geriatrics Society Beers criteria.采用2015年美国老年医学会Beers标准评估老年人潜在不适当用药的患病率及危险因素。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 May 29;19(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1168-1.
5
Knowledge of patients on safe medication use in relation to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.患者对非甾体抗炎药安全用药的了解情况。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr-Jun;13(2):106-111. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_557_18.
6
Investigating the epidemiology of medication errors in adults in community care settings. A retrospective cohort study in central Saudi Arabia.调查社区护理环境中成年患者用药错误的流行病学情况。沙特阿拉伯中部的一项回顾性队列研究。
Saudi Med J. 2019 Feb;40(2):158-167. doi: 10.15537/smj.2019.2.23933.
7
SMASH! The Salford medication safety dashboard.猛击!索尔福德药物安全仪表盘。
J Innov Health Inform. 2018 Oct 18;25(3):183-193. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v25i3.1015.
8
Time trends and geographical variation in prescribing of antibiotics in England 1998-2017.1998-2017 年英格兰抗生素处方的时间趋势和地域差异。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jan 1;74(1):242-250. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky377.
9
Top 10 most used drugs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2010-2015.2010 - 2015年沙特阿拉伯王国使用最频繁的十大药物。
Saudi Pharm J. 2018 Feb;26(2):211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
10
Possible Sources of Bias in Primary Care Electronic Health Record Data Use and Reuse.基层医疗电子健康记录数据使用与再利用中可能存在的偏差来源。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 29;20(5):e185. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9134.