Suppr超能文献

基于模拟的自主学习能否提高护生的批判性思维和学习动机?一项采用MAES©方法的干预前后对照研究。

Does Self-Directed Learning with Simulation Improve Critical Thinking and Motivation of Nursing Students? A Pre-Post Intervention Study with the MAES© Methodology.

作者信息

Arizo-Luque Vanessa, Ramirez-Baena Lucía, Pujalte-Jesús María José, Rodríguez-Herrera María Ángeles, Lozano-Molina Ainhoa, Arrogante Oscar, Díaz-Agea José Luis

机构信息

Nursing Department, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Guadalupe de Maciascoque, Spain.

Red Cross University Centre for Nursing, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 18;10(5):927. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050927.

Abstract

Motivation and critical thinking are fundamental for the development of adequate learning. The purpose of the present study was to assess the motivation for learning and critical thinking among nursing students before and after self-directed simulation-based training using the MAES© methodology. A cross-sectional and descriptive quantitative study was conducted with a sample of third-year nursing students. The instruments utilized were the Spanish-adapted version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ-44), and the Critical Thinking for Nursing Professionals Questionnaire (CuPCPE). The students improved their levels both of motivation components, (such as self-efficacy, strategy use, self-regulation) and critical thinking components (such as personal characteristics, intellectual and cognitive abilities, interpersonal abilities and self-management, and technical abilities). These improvements could be a result of the intrinsic characteristics of the MAES© methodology (as a team-based, self-directed, collaborative and peer-to-peer learning method).

摘要

动机和批判性思维是充分学习发展的基础。本研究的目的是使用MAES©方法评估护理专业学生在基于自我导向模拟训练前后的学习动机和批判性思维。对三年级护理专业学生样本进行了横断面描述性定量研究。所使用的工具是西班牙语改编版的《学习动机策略问卷》(MSLQ - 44)和《护理专业人员批判性思维问卷》(CuPCPE)。学生在动机成分(如自我效能感、策略运用、自我调节)和批判性思维成分(如个人特质、智力和认知能力、人际能力和自我管理以及技术能力)方面的水平均有所提高。这些改进可能是MAES©方法内在特征(作为一种基于团队、自我导向、协作和同伴互助的学习方法)的结果。

相似文献

3
Perceptions about the Self-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments in Nursing Students: A Mixed Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 22;16(23):4646. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234646.
4
Improving simulation performance through Self-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments (MAES©).
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 May;76:62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
6
Nursing students' perceptions and satisfaction with a self-learning methodology in simulated environments: A mixed-methods study.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Oct;80:104141. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104141. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Simulation-Based Education and Nursing Student Learning Motivations: A Scoping Review.
Cureus. 2025 May 18;17(5):e84375. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84375. eCollection 2025 May.
2
The expository phase of debriefing in clinical simulation: a qualitative study.
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 30;24(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03067-z.
7
Implications of clinical simulation in motivation for learning: scoping review.
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Apr 29;22:RW0792. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024RW0792. eCollection 2024.
8
Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review.
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2189553. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2189553.

本文引用的文献

2
Evaluating the Clinical Reasoning of Student Health Professionals in Placement and Simulation Settings: A Systematic Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;19(2):936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020936.
3
Effectiveness of using simulation in the development of clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Nov;57:103220. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103220. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
4
The effects of teaching methods on academic motivation in nursing students: A systematic review.
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Jul 30;10:271. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1070_20. eCollection 2021.
6
Motivation: bringing up the rear in nursing education. Motivational elements in simulation. The participants' perspective.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Aug;103:104925. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104925. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
7
The validity and reliability of clinical judgement and decision-making skills assessment in nursing: A systematic literature review.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jul;102:104885. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104885. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
8
Development of clinical competence in nursing in simulation: the perspective of Bloom's taxonomy.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Mar 24;74(1):e20200135. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0135. eCollection 2021.
9
Debriefing methods and learning outcomes in simulation nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Apr;87:104345. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104345. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
10
Guidelines and Essential Elements for Prebriefing.
Simul Healthc. 2019 Dec;14(6):409-414. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000403.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验