Suppr超能文献

模拟护理教育中的汇报方法和学习成果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Debriefing methods and learning outcomes in simulation nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, 510 College of Nursing, Yonsei-ro 50, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.

Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, 605 College of Nursing, Yonsei-ro 50, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Apr;87:104345. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104345. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Simulation can serve as an effective educational method to provide experience and opportunities to learn about the nursing management of clinical cases in a secure environment. Numerous debriefing methods have been used in simulation in nurse education to improve clinical competencies and learning outcomes. However, there is insufficient evidence to identify the debriefing methods that are most effective in improving learning outcomes. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the focus is on debriefing methods and learning outcomes in simulation in nurse education.

DESIGN

This systematic review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement.

DATA SOURCES

Studies published from January 1995 to December 2016 were identified from PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and Korean databases.

REVIEW METHODS

Experimental studies that used debriefing methods in simulation in nurse education were included as review studies. Studies that used identical validated measurement tools were included in the meta-analysis. We applied a random-effects model with subgroups. Effect sizes for learning outcomes according to debriefing methods were calculated using standardized mean differences.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies were selected through systematic review and 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis using four types of scales measuring learning outcomes after debriefing. The overall effect size of the learning outcomes, according to the type of debriefing method, was 0.31. The results regarding debriefing methods were statistically non-significant in the learning outcomes (95% CI [-0.33-0.96], Z = 0.95, p = 0.34). A symmetric shape indicated a lack of publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings indicated that structured debriefing helped to improve learning. Future studies are needed to provide effective debriefing strategies with larger sample sizes.

摘要

目的

模拟可以作为一种有效的教育方法,提供在安全环境中学习临床病例护理管理的经验和机会。在护士教育中,模拟中使用了许多的讨论方法来提高临床能力和学习成果。然而,没有足够的证据来确定哪些讨论方法最能有效地提高学习成果。在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,重点是模拟在护士教育中的讨论方法和学习成果。

设计

本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行。

数据来源

从 PubMed、Embase、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Web of Science、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆和韩国数据库中检索 1995 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月发表的研究。

审查方法

包括在护士教育中使用讨论方法的模拟的实验研究。包括使用相同验证测量工具的研究。我们应用随机效应模型和亚组。根据讨论方法计算学习成果的效应大小,使用标准化均数差。

结果

通过系统评价选择了 18 项研究,通过使用四种测量讨论后学习成果的量表,有 7 项研究纳入荟萃分析。根据讨论方法的类型,学习成果的总体效应大小为 0.31。讨论方法对学习成果的结果在统计学上无显著意义(95%CI[-0.33-0.96],Z=0.95,p=0.34)。对称形状表明不存在发表偏倚。

结论

研究结果表明,结构化讨论有助于提高学习成绩。未来需要进行更多的研究,提供更有效的讨论策略和更大的样本量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验