• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普通公众、癌症患者和医疗保健专业人员在接受检测及风险降低手术意愿上的差异:一项基于大规模人群的调查。

Differences in Willingness to Undergo Testing and Risk Reducing Surgery among the General Public, Cancer Patients, and Healthcare Professionals: A Large Population-Based Survey.

作者信息

Chang Yoon Jung, Cho Seungyeon, Joo Jungnam, Ryu Kum Hei, Lee Sangwon, Cho Juhee, Lim Myong Cheol, Jung So-Youn, Han Jai Hong, Lee Eun Sook, Kong Sun-Young

机构信息

Division of Cancer Control & Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.

Department of Cancer Control and Policy, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang 10408, Korea.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2022 May 18;12(5):818. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050818.

DOI:10.3390/jpm12050818
PMID:
35629239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9147340/
Abstract

We aimed to understand the decision-making process related to the willingness to undergo BRCA1/2 genetic testing, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), or risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) among the general public, cancer patients, and healthcare professionals in South Korea. In total, 3444 individuals (1496 from the general public, 1500 cancer patients, 108 clinicians, and 340 researchers) completed a survey addressing genetic testing and related risk management options in a hypothetical scenario. Differences in intent and associated factors for undergoing the above procedures or sharing test results were analyzed. Overall, 67% of participants were willing to undergo BRCA1/2 testing, with proportions of the general public (58%), cancer patients (70%), clinicians (88%), and researchers (90%). The willingness to undergo RRSO was highest among clinicians (58%), followed by among patients (38%), the general public (33%), and researchers (32%) (p < 0.001). Gender, age, education level, and household income were associated with willingness to undergo genetic testing, RRM, and RRSO (p < 0.05). The intent for undergo genetic testing, RRM, and RRSO were affected by many factors. Finally, 69% of the general public intended to share information with family, while this percentage was 92%, 91%, and 94% for patients, clinicians, and researchers, respectively (p < 0.05). These results highlight the requirement for developing targeted educational materials and counseling strategies for facilitating informed decision making.

摘要

我们旨在了解韩国普通公众、癌症患者及医疗保健专业人员中与接受BRCA1/2基因检测、降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术(RRSO)或降低风险的乳房切除术(RRM)意愿相关的决策过程。共有3444人(1496名普通公众、1500名癌症患者、108名临床医生和340名研究人员)完成了一项针对假设情景下基因检测及相关风险管理选项的调查。分析了接受上述手术或分享检测结果的意愿及相关因素的差异。总体而言,67%的参与者愿意接受BRCA1/2检测,其中普通公众的比例为58%,癌症患者为70%,临床医生为88%,研究人员为90%。临床医生中接受RRSO的意愿最高(58%),其次是患者(38%)、普通公众(33%)和研究人员(32%)(p<0.001)。性别、年龄、教育水平和家庭收入与接受基因检测、RRM和RRSO的意愿相关(p<0.05)。接受基因检测、RRM和RRSO的意愿受多种因素影响。最后,69%的普通公众打算与家人分享信息,而患者、临床医生和研究人员的这一比例分别为92%、91%和94%(p<0.05)。这些结果凸显了开发有针对性的教育材料和咨询策略以促进明智决策的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9147340/5680eca4450b/jpm-12-00818-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9147340/d7941f9843a9/jpm-12-00818-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9147340/53a36d2d0b5e/jpm-12-00818-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9147340/432e46629461/jpm-12-00818-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9147340/5680eca4450b/jpm-12-00818-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9147340/d7941f9843a9/jpm-12-00818-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9147340/53a36d2d0b5e/jpm-12-00818-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9147340/432e46629461/jpm-12-00818-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9147340/5680eca4450b/jpm-12-00818-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in Willingness to Undergo Testing and Risk Reducing Surgery among the General Public, Cancer Patients, and Healthcare Professionals: A Large Population-Based Survey.普通公众、癌症患者和医疗保健专业人员在接受检测及风险降低手术意愿上的差异:一项基于大规模人群的调查。
J Pers Med. 2022 May 18;12(5):818. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050818.
2
Predictors of risk-reducing surgery intentions following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌遗传咨询后降低风险手术意向的预测因素。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 May 20;10(2):337-346. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby101.
3
Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.对携带BRCA1或BRCA2基因突变的女性进行降低风险的双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 24;8(8):CD012464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012464.pub2.
4
The effect of personal medical history and family history of cancer on the uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.个人癌症病史和家族癌症病史对降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术接受率的影响。
Fam Cancer. 2015 Dec;14(4):539-44. doi: 10.1007/s10689-015-9827-7.
5
Association of premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: Maximising bias-reduction.BRCA1/2 基因突变携带者中绝经前降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术与乳腺癌风险的关联:最大程度减少偏倚。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jun;132:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
6
Uptake and efficacy of bilateral risk reducing surgery in unaffected female and carriers.双侧预防性降低风险手术在未受影响的女性和携带者中的应用及效果。
J Med Genet. 2022 Feb;59(2):133-140. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107356. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
7
Cost-effectiveness of surveillance and prevention strategies in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.BRCA1/2 基因突变携带者的监测和预防策略的成本效益分析。
Breast Cancer. 2018 Mar;25(2):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s12282-017-0803-y. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
8
Intentions for risk-reducing surgery among high-risk women referred for BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic counseling.被转介接受BRCA1/BRCA2基因咨询的高危女性进行降低风险手术的意向。
Psychooncology. 2015 Jan;24(1):33-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.3560. Epub 2014 May 17.
9
Risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: Are there factors associated with the choice?BRCA1/BRCA2 突变携带者的降低风险手术:是否存在与选择相关的因素?
Psychooncology. 2019 Sep;28(9):1871-1878. doi: 10.1002/pon.5166. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
10
[Present status and tasks for genetic testing and risk-reducing surgery in patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer].[遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者基因检测及降低风险手术的现状与任务]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2012 Apr;39(4):525-31.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Primary Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Strategies in East and Southeast Asia.东亚和东南亚原发性乳腺癌风险降低策略的范围综述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 7;17(2):168. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020168.
2
Impact of barriers and motivators on intention and confidence to undergo hereditary cancer genetic testing.障碍和动机对遗传性癌症基因检测意愿及信心的影响
J Genet Couns. 2025 Feb;34(1):e1926. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1926. Epub 2024 May 27.
3
Risk-reducing decisions regarding germline pathogenic variant: focusing on the timing of genetic testing and RRSO.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes and training needs of oncologists and surgeons in mainstreaming breast cancer genetic counseling in a low-to-middle income Asian country.在一个中低收入的亚洲国家,将乳腺癌遗传咨询纳入主流,肿瘤学家和外科医生的态度和培训需求。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Oct;31(5):1080-1089. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1579. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
2
Different Patterns of Risk Reducing Decisions in Affected or Unaffected BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers.不同风险降低决策模式在受影响或未受影响的 BRCA 致病性变异携带者中的体现。
Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;51(1):280-288. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.079. Epub 2018 May 4.
3
Cancer cost communication: experiences and preferences of patients, caregivers, and oncologists-a nationwide triad study.
针对种系致病性变异的风险降低决策:重点关注基因检测和 RRSO 的时间。
J Med Genet. 2024 Mar 21;61(4):392-398. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109549.
4
Risk-Reducing Breast and Gynecological Surgery for BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Narrative Review.BRCA 突变携带者的降低风险的乳腺和妇科手术:一篇叙述性综述。
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 10;12(4):1422. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041422.
癌症成本沟通:患者、护理人员和肿瘤医生的经验和偏好——一项全国性三方研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Oct;26(10):3517-3526. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4201-6. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
4
Awareness, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes towards genetic testing for cancer risk among ethnic minority groups: a systematic review.少数民族群体对癌症风险基因检测的认知、知识、看法及态度:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 25;17(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4375-8.
5
Clinical applicability and cost of a 46-gene panel for genomic analysis of solid tumours: Retrospective validation and prospective audit in the UK National Health Service.用于实体瘤基因组分析的46基因检测板的临床适用性和成本:英国国家医疗服务体系中的回顾性验证和前瞻性审核
PLoS Med. 2017 Feb 14;14(2):e1002230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002230. eCollection 2017 Feb.
6
Participation of low-income women in genetic cancer risk assessment and BRCA 1/2 testing: the experience of a safety-net institution.低收入女性参与遗传性癌症风险评估及BRCA 1/2检测:一家安全网机构的经验
J Community Genet. 2016 Jul;7(3):177-83. doi: 10.1007/s12687-015-0257-x. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
7
Current Status of the Management of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Asia: First Report by the Asian BRCA Consortium.亚洲遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌管理现状:亚洲BRCA联盟的首份报告
Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(1):53-60. doi: 10.1159/000441714. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
8
Uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among female BRCA mutation carriers: experience at the National Cancer Center of Korea.韩国国家癌症中心女性 BRCA 突变携带者进行降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术的情况:经验总结
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan;142(1):333-40. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-2051-x. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
9
Factors associated with genetic counseling and BRCA testing in a population-based sample of young Black women with breast cancer.在以人群为基础的年轻黑人乳腺癌女性样本中,与遗传咨询和BRCA检测相关的因素。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 May;151(1):169-76. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3374-7. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
10
The prevalence and spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Korean population: recent update of the Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer (KOHBRA) study.韩国人群中BRCA1和BRCA2突变的患病率及谱系:韩国遗传性乳腺癌(KOHBRA)研究的最新进展
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 May;151(1):157-68. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3377-4. Epub 2015 Apr 12.