• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

少数民族群体对癌症风险基因检测的认知、知识、看法及态度:一项系统综述

Awareness, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes towards genetic testing for cancer risk among ethnic minority groups: a systematic review.

作者信息

Hann Katie E J, Freeman Madeleine, Fraser Lindsay, Waller Jo, Sanderson Saskia C, Rahman Belinda, Side Lucy, Gessler Sue, Lanceley Anne

机构信息

Department of Women's Cancer, EGA UCL Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2017 May 25;17(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4375-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-017-4375-8
PMID:28545429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5445407/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Genetic testing for risk of hereditary cancer can help patients to make important decisions about prevention or early detection. US and UK studies show that people from ethnic minority groups are less likely to receive genetic testing. It is important to understand various groups' awareness of genetic testing and its acceptability to avoid further disparities in health care. This review aims to identify and detail awareness, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes towards genetic counselling/testing for cancer risk prediction in ethnic minority groups.

METHODS

A search was carried out in PsycInfo, CINAHL, Embase and MEDLINE. Search terms referred to ethnicity, genetic testing/counselling, cancer, awareness, knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions. Quantitative and qualitative studies, written in English, and published between 2000 and 2015, were included.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were selected for review: 39 from the US, and two from Australia. Results revealed low awareness and knowledge of genetic counselling/testing for cancer susceptibility amongst ethnic minority groups including African Americans, Asian Americans, and Hispanics. Attitudes towards genetic testing were generally positive; perceived benefits included positive implications for personal health and being able to inform family. However, negative attitudes were also evident, particularly the anticipated emotional impact of test results, and concerns about confidentiality, stigma, and discrimination. Chinese Australian groups were less studied, but of interest was a finding from qualitative research indicating that different views of who close family members are could impact on reported family history of cancer, which could in turn impact a risk assessment.

CONCLUSION

Interventions are needed to increase awareness and knowledge of genetic testing for cancer risk and to reduce the perceived stigma and taboo surrounding the topic of cancer in ethnic minority groups. More detailed research is needed in countries other than the US and across a broader spectrum of ethnic minority groups to develop effective culturally sensitive approaches for cancer prevention.

摘要

背景

遗传性癌症风险的基因检测有助于患者做出关于预防或早期检测的重要决策。美国和英国的研究表明,少数族裔群体接受基因检测的可能性较小。了解不同群体对基因检测的认知及其可接受性对于避免医疗保健方面的进一步差距很重要。本综述旨在确定并详细阐述少数族裔群体对癌症风险预测的基因咨询/检测的认知、知识、看法和态度。

方法

在PsycInfo、CINAHL、Embase和MEDLINE中进行了检索。检索词涉及种族、基因检测/咨询、癌症、认知、知识、态度和看法。纳入了2000年至2015年间发表的、用英文撰写的定量和定性研究。

结果

选取了41项研究进行综述:39项来自美国,2项来自澳大利亚。结果显示,包括非裔美国人、亚裔美国人和西班牙裔在内的少数族裔群体对癌症易感性的基因咨询/检测的认知和知识水平较低。对基因检测的态度总体上是积极的;感知到的好处包括对个人健康有积极影响以及能够告知家人。然而,消极态度也很明显,特别是对检测结果预期的情绪影响,以及对保密性、耻辱感和歧视的担忧。对澳大利亚华裔群体的研究较少,但定性研究中的一项发现很有意思,即对近亲家庭成员的不同看法可能会影响报告的癌症家族史,进而影响风险评估。

结论

需要采取干预措施来提高对癌症风险基因检测的认知和知识,并减少少数族裔群体中围绕癌症话题的感知耻辱感和禁忌。除美国之外的其他国家以及更广泛的少数族裔群体需要进行更详细的研究,以制定有效的具有文化敏感性的癌症预防方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b796/5445407/dd9f6f43a0e7/12889_2017_4375_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b796/5445407/11c9d43fc276/12889_2017_4375_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b796/5445407/777c47da21d2/12889_2017_4375_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b796/5445407/dd9f6f43a0e7/12889_2017_4375_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b796/5445407/11c9d43fc276/12889_2017_4375_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b796/5445407/777c47da21d2/12889_2017_4375_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b796/5445407/dd9f6f43a0e7/12889_2017_4375_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Awareness, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes towards genetic testing for cancer risk among ethnic minority groups: a systematic review.少数民族群体对癌症风险基因检测的认知、知识、看法及态度:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 25;17(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4375-8.
2
Targeted mass media interventions promoting healthy behaviours to reduce risk of non-communicable diseases in adult, ethnic minorities.针对成年少数民族群体,通过有针对性的大众媒体干预措施来促进健康行为,以降低非传染性疾病风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 17;2(2):CD011683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011683.pub2.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
5
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响低收入和中等收入国家熟练助产士提供产时和产后护理的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11(11):CD011558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011558.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Employee perspectives on genetic testing in the workplace: Results from a national survey.员工对职场基因检测的看法:一项全国性调查的结果。
Public Health Genomics. 2025 Aug 22:1-15. doi: 10.1159/000548116.
2
The Experiences of Patients With Rare Diseases in Pennsylvania: A Community-Based Study.宾夕法尼亚州罕见病患者的经历:一项基于社区的研究。
Public Health Rep. 2025 Sep 7:333549251362711. doi: 10.1177/00333549251362711.
3
Awareness and knowledge of familial breast and ovarian cancer among German general practice patients.德国全科医疗患者对家族性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的知晓情况与认知程度。

本文引用的文献

1
Public attitudes toward genetic risk testing and its role in healthcare.公众对基因风险检测及其在医疗保健中的作用的态度。
Per Med. 2014 Jul;11(5):509-522. doi: 10.2217/pme.14.35.
2
Cancer fear and fatalism among ethnic minority women in the United Kingdom.英国少数族裔女性中的癌症恐惧与宿命论
Br J Cancer. 2016 Mar 1;114(5):597-604. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.15. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
3
Cancer statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2015.2015 年西班牙裔/拉丁裔癌症统计数据。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70105. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70105.
4
Obstacles in genetic testing for germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations in patients with primary breast and ovarian cancer in Switzerland.瑞士原发性乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者种系BRCA1/2致病突变基因检测中的障碍。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Aug 9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08138-9.
5
How participation in deliberative engagement affects awareness of, and attitudes towards, genomics research and data sharing: evidence from rural Ghana.参与协商性参与如何影响对基因组学研究和数据共享的认识及态度:来自加纳农村的证据。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01251-z.
6
Clinician Recommendation for Hereditary Genetic Testing in Participants at Increased Risk for Hereditary Cancer.针对遗传性癌症风险增加的参与者进行遗传性基因检测的临床医生建议。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 14;17(12):1994. doi: 10.3390/cancers17121994.
7
Patient, caregiver experiences in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: insights from a multi-national survey.转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者及照料者的经历:一项多国调查的见解
Future Oncol. 2025 Jul;21(16):2053-2066. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2510890. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
8
Perspectives of people with cystic fibrosis considering parenthood surrounding preconception and prenatal genetic counseling and testing.囊性纤维化患者对于孕前和产前遗传咨询及检测相关为人父母问题的看法。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17534666251340334. doi: 10.1177/17534666251340334. Epub 2025 May 28.
9
Neighborhood Disadvantage and Genetic Testing Use Among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Adults.美国成年人全国代表性样本中的邻里劣势与基因检测使用情况
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251342102. doi: 10.1177/21501319251342102. Epub 2025 May 25.
10
Awareness and utilization of genetic testing for hereditary cancers in cancer survivors: a cross-sectional 2021 HINTS-SEER study.癌症幸存者对遗传性癌症基因检测的认知与应用:一项2021年横断面的健康信息全国趋势调查(HINTS)-监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)研究
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01823-3.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Nov-Dec;65(6):457-80. doi: 10.3322/caac.21314. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
4
BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing-pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance.BRCA1和BRCA2基因检测——处理临床意义不确定变异的陷阱与建议
Ann Oncol. 2015 Oct;26(10):2057-65. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv278. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
5
Does lung cancer attract greater stigma than other cancer types?肺癌比其他癌症类型更容易招致污名化吗?
Lung Cancer. 2015 Apr;88(1):104-7. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.01.024. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
6
Cancer statistics, 2015.癌症统计数据,2015 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
7
What Black Women Know and Want to Know About Counseling and Testing for BRCA1/2.黑人女性对BRCA1/2基因咨询与检测的了解及想了解的内容
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Jun;30(2):344-52. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0740-9.
8
BRCA genetic counseling among at-risk Latinas in New York City: new beliefs shape new generation.纽约市高危拉丁裔群体中的BRCA基因咨询:新观念塑造新一代。
J Genet Couns. 2015 Feb;24(1):134-48. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9746-z. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
9
Awareness of cancer susceptibility genetic testing: the 2000, 2005, and 2010 National Health Interview Surveys.癌症易感性基因检测认知情况:2000年、2005年及2010年国家健康访谈调查
Am J Prev Med. 2014 May;46(5):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.002.
10
What hinders minority ethnic access to cancer genetics services and what may help?是什么阻碍了少数族裔获得癌症基因检测服务,又有什么可能会有帮助呢?
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Jul;22(7):866-74. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.257. Epub 2013 Nov 20.