Bardini Giulia, Cotti Elisabetta, Congiu Terenzio, Caria Claudia, Aru Davide, Mercadè Montse
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.
Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 13;15(10):3501. doi: 10.3390/ma15103501.
This study investigated the possibility of re-treating a calcium silicate-based sealer (CSBS), compared to an epoxy-resin sealer (RBS), using rotary instrumentation at different times from obturation (1 month/1 year). Thirty-six human mandibular premolars, extracted as a result of orthodontic or periodontal problems, were instrumented and randomly divided into three groups of 12: BR and BR*, which were filled with CSBS and re-treated after one month and one year of storage, respectively, and AH, which was filled with RBS and re-treated after one month. The same re-treatment protocol was used for all teeth, and the times required for the procedure was recorded. The re-treated specimens were longitudinally sectioned and examined at the stereomicroscope (SM) at 20× magnification. Image J Software was used to process the microphotographs. The percentage of residual filling materials in the root canal and the apical third, the ability to reach working length WL and patency, and the time taken to complete the re-treatment were recorded and analyzed by ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni test ( = 0.05). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and coupled energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were applied to representative samples to evaluate canal cleanliness and chemical elements. Patency and WL were re-established in all of the teeth. Residual filling materials were retained in all specimens of the three groups. The mean percentage of residual materials was significantly different between BR and BR* (-value = 0.048), with BR* showing the highest values. The mean time to complete re-treatment was significantly lower for AH, followed by BR ( = 0.0001) and BR* ( = 0.0078). Conclusions: After both medium and long storage periods, the CSBS can be concluded to have been successfully removed from canals with simple anatomy.
本研究调查了与环氧树脂封闭剂(RBS)相比,在根管充填后不同时间(1个月/1年)使用旋转器械对硅酸钙基封闭剂(CSBS)进行再治疗的可能性。36颗因正畸或牙周问题拔除的人类下颌前磨牙,经过预备后随机分为三组,每组12颗:BR组和BR组,分别用CSBS充填,并在储存1个月和1年后进行再治疗;AH组用RBS充填,并在1个月后进行再治疗。所有牙齿采用相同的再治疗方案,并记录该过程所需的时间。将再治疗后的标本纵向切片,在体视显微镜(SM)下以20倍放大倍数进行检查。使用Image J软件处理显微照片。记录根管和根尖三分之一处残留充填材料的百分比、达到工作长度WL和通畅的能力以及完成再治疗所需的时间,并通过方差分析和事后Bonferroni检验(α = 0.05)进行分析。对代表性样本应用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和能谱仪(EDS)来评估根管清洁度和化学元素。所有牙齿均重新建立了通畅和工作长度。三组所有标本中均保留有残留充填材料。BR组和BR组之间残留材料的平均百分比有显著差异(P值 = 0.048),BR组显示出最高值。AH组完成再治疗的平均时间显著低于BR组(P = 0.0001)和BR组(P = 0.0078)。结论:在中长期储存期后,可以得出结论,对于解剖结构简单的根管,CSBS能够成功地从根管中去除。