College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Nutrients. 2022 May 14;14(10):2064. doi: 10.3390/nu14102064.
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate cross-sectional differences in functional connectivity across cognitive networks at rest among age and sex matched college students with very low food security [food insecurity (FI); n = 20] and with high food security (n = 20). The participants completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-2 (BRIEF-2) and Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) questionnaires. Seven-minute resting-state fMRI scans were collected. Independent Component Analysis assessed group connectivity differences in three large-scale networks: the default-mode network (DMN), the frontoparietal network (FPN), and the salience network (SN). FI was associated with poorer Global BRIEF scores (adjusted β = 8.36; 95% CI: 2.32, 14.40) and five BRIEF subscales: Inhibit, Initiate, Working Memory, Plan, and Organize (p-values < 0.05). The students with FI had greater functional connectivity between the FPN and left middle temporal gyrus (cluster size p-FWE = 0.029), the SN and precuneus (cluster size p-FWE < 0.001), and the SN and right middle frontal gyrus (cluster size p-FWE = 0.016) compared to the students with high food security. Exploratory correlations revealed that greater connectivity between the SN and right middle frontal gyrus was associated with poorer BRIEF Inhibit scores (p = 0.038), and greater connectivity between the FPN and left middle temporal gyrus was associated with poorer BRIEF Organize scores (p = 0.024) for the students with FI. Greater functional connectivity between the FPN, DMN, and SN at rest may contribute to executive function difficulties for college students with FI.
我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来研究在年龄和性别匹配的大学生中,极低食品安全(食品不安全(FI);n=20)和高食品安全(n=20)的被试在静息状态下认知网络功能连接的横断面差异。参与者完成了行为评定量表的执行功能-2(BRIEF-2)和童年不良经历(ACEs)问卷。采集了 7 分钟的静息态 fMRI 扫描。独立成分分析评估了三个大尺度网络的组连接差异:默认模式网络(DMN)、额顶网络(FPN)和突显网络(SN)。FI 与较差的全局 BRIEF 评分(调整β=8.36;95%CI:2.32,14.40)和五个 BRIEF 分量表相关:抑制、启动、工作记忆、计划和组织(p 值<0.05)。FI 组的 FPN 与左侧颞中回之间的功能连接更强(簇大小 p-FWE=0.029)、SN 与楔前叶之间的功能连接更强(簇大小 p-FWE<0.001)以及 SN 与右侧额中回之间的功能连接更强(簇大小 p-FWE=0.016)。探索性相关性表明,SN 与右侧额中回之间的连接越强,BRIEF 抑制得分越低(p=0.038),FI 组的 FPN 与左侧颞中回之间的连接越强,BRIEF 组织得分越低(p=0.024)。FI 大学生静息状态下 FPN、DMN 和 SN 之间的功能连接增加可能导致执行功能困难。