• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于车载多模态传感器的自动事故检测机器学习框架。

A Machine Learning Framework for Automated Accident Detection Based on Multimodal Sensors in Cars.

机构信息

Research Group of Operating Systems and Distributed Systems, University of Siegen, Hölderlinstr. 3, 57076 Siegen, Germany.

Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 10;22(10):3634. doi: 10.3390/s22103634.

DOI:10.3390/s22103634
PMID:35632039
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9146681/
Abstract

Identifying accident patterns is one of the most vital research foci of driving analysis. Environmental or safety applications and the growing area of fleet management all benefit from accident detection contributions by minimizing the risk vehicles and drivers are subject to, improving their service and reducing overhead costs. Some solutions have been proposed in the past literature for automated accident detection that are mainly based on traffic data or external sensors. However, traffic data can be difficult to access, while external sensors can end up being difficult to set up and unreliable, depending on how they are used. Additionally, the scarcity of accident detection data has limited the type of approaches used in the past, leaving in particular, machine learning (ML) relatively unexplored. Thus, in this paper, we propose a ML framework for automated car accident detection based on mutimodal in-car sensors. Our work is a unique and innovative study on detecting real-world driving accidents by applying state-of-the-art feature extraction methods using basic sensors in cars. In total, five different feature extraction approaches, including techniques based on feature engineering and feature learning with deep learning are evaluated on the strategic highway research program (SHRP2) naturalistic driving study (NDS) crash data set. The main observations of this study are as follows: (1) CNN features with a SVM classifier obtain very promising results, outperforming all other tested approaches. (2) Feature engineering and feature learning approaches were finding different best performing features. Therefore, our fusion experiment indicates that these two feature sets can be efficiently combined. (3) Unsupervised feature extraction remarkably achieves a notable performance score.

摘要

识别事故模式是驾驶分析中最重要的研究焦点之一。环境或安全应用以及车队管理领域的不断发展都受益于事故检测的贡献,通过最大限度地降低车辆和驾驶员面临的风险,提高他们的服务质量并降低运营成本。过去的文献中已经提出了一些用于自动化事故检测的解决方案,这些解决方案主要基于交通数据或外部传感器。然而,交通数据可能难以获取,而外部传感器可能由于使用方式的不同而难以设置和不可靠。此外,事故检测数据的稀缺性限制了过去使用的方法类型,特别是机器学习 (ML) 方法相对较少被探索。因此,在本文中,我们提出了一种基于车内多模态传感器的自动化汽车事故检测的 ML 框架。我们的工作是一项独特而创新的研究,通过在汽车中使用基本传感器应用最先进的特征提取方法来检测现实世界中的驾驶事故。总共评估了五种不同的特征提取方法,包括基于特征工程和深度学习的特征学习技术,应用于战略公路研究计划 (SHRP2) 自然驾驶研究 (NDS) 事故数据集。本研究的主要观察结果如下:(1) 基于 SVM 分类器的 CNN 特征获得了非常有前景的结果,优于所有其他测试方法。(2) 特征工程和特征学习方法找到了不同的最佳表现特征。因此,我们的融合实验表明,这两个特征集可以有效地结合。(3) 无监督特征提取显著达到了显著的性能得分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/240b50cf6a74/sensors-22-03634-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/04a73c440fc6/sensors-22-03634-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/a867449fe614/sensors-22-03634-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/8b1a870a6abc/sensors-22-03634-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/b22cf60708da/sensors-22-03634-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/7be783decd7a/sensors-22-03634-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/9e9648ffc85b/sensors-22-03634-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/73c58ba9a120/sensors-22-03634-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/240b50cf6a74/sensors-22-03634-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/04a73c440fc6/sensors-22-03634-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/a867449fe614/sensors-22-03634-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/8b1a870a6abc/sensors-22-03634-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/b22cf60708da/sensors-22-03634-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/7be783decd7a/sensors-22-03634-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/9e9648ffc85b/sensors-22-03634-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/73c58ba9a120/sensors-22-03634-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/9146681/240b50cf6a74/sensors-22-03634-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
A Machine Learning Framework for Automated Accident Detection Based on Multimodal Sensors in Cars.基于车载多模态传感器的自动事故检测机器学习框架。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 10;22(10):3634. doi: 10.3390/s22103634.
2
Detecting lane change maneuvers using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data: A comparative study machine learning techniques.利用 SHRP2 自然驾驶数据检测变道行为:机器学习技术的比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jul;142:105578. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105578. Epub 2020 May 11.
3
A data-driven feature learning approach based on Copula-Bayesian Network and its application in comparative investigation on risky lane-changing and car-following maneuvers.基于 Copula-Bayesian 网络的数据驱动特征学习方法及其在风险换道和跟驰行为比较研究中的应用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 May;154:106061. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106061. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
4
Efficient mapping of crash risk at intersections with connected vehicle data and deep learning models.利用车联网数据和深度学习模型实现交叉口碰撞风险的高效映射。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105665. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105665. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
5
Real-time driving risk assessment using deep learning with XGBoost.基于 XGBoost 的深度学习实时驾驶风险评估
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Dec;178:106836. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106836. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
6
Trajectory-level fog detection based on in-vehicle video camera with TensorFlow deep learning utilizing SHRP2 naturalistic driving data.基于 TensorFlow 深度学习利用 SHRP2 自然驾驶数据的车载视频摄像机的轨迹级雾检测。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jul;142:105521. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105521. Epub 2020 May 11.
7
Driver Fatigue Detection Systems Using Multi-Sensors, Smartphone, and Cloud-Based Computing Platforms: A Comparative Analysis.基于多传感器、智能手机和云平台的驾驶员疲劳检测系统:比较分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;21(1):56. doi: 10.3390/s21010056.
8
Recognising safety critical events: can automatic video processing improve naturalistic data analyses?识别安全关键事件:自动视频处理能否改进自然主义数据分析?
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Nov;60:298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
9
Real-time snowy weather detection based on machine vision and vehicle kinematics: A non-parametric data fusion analysis protocol.基于机器视觉和车辆运动学的实时雪天检测:一种非参数数据融合分析协议
J Safety Res. 2022 Dec;83:163-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.08.013. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
10
Insights into Factors Affecting Traffic Accident Severity of Novice and Experienced Drivers: A Machine Learning Approach.新手和经验丰富司机的交通事故严重程度影响因素的洞察:一种机器学习方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 2;18(23):12725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312725.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensor-Based Classification of Primary and Secondary Car Driver Activities Using Convolutional Neural Networks.基于卷积神经网络的主、副驾驶行为的传感器分类。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 13;23(12):5551. doi: 10.3390/s23125551.
2
Analysis of the Impact of Invisible Road Icing on Selected Parameters of a Minibus Vehicle.分析隐形道路结冰对小型客车某些参数的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 12;22(24):9726. doi: 10.3390/s22249726.
3
A deep neural framework for real-time vehicular accident detection based on motion temporal templates.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods for Physiological Signals for Heat-Based Pain Recognition.基于热的疼痛识别的生理信号特征提取方法比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 15;21(14):4838. doi: 10.3390/s21144838.
2
Injury risk assessment based on pre-crash variables: The role of closing velocity and impact eccentricity.基于碰撞前变量的损伤风险评估:闭合速度和碰撞偏心度的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Feb;150:105864. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105864. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
3
Deep Transfer Learning for Time Series Data Based on Sensor Modality Classification.
一种基于运动时间模板的实时车辆事故检测深度神经框架。
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 3;8(11):e11397. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11397. eCollection 2022 Nov.
基于传感器模态分类的时间序列数据深度迁移学习。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 31;20(15):4271. doi: 10.3390/s20154271.
4
Relief-based feature selection: Introduction and review.基于缓解的特征选择:介绍与综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Sep;85:189-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
5
Comparison of Feature Learning Methods for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors.基于可穿戴传感器的人体活动识别中特征学习方法的比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Feb 24;18(2):679. doi: 10.3390/s18020679.
6
Driver behavior profiling: An investigation with different smartphone sensors and machine learning.驾驶员行为分析:基于不同智能手机传感器和机器学习的调查
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 10;12(4):e0174959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174959. eCollection 2017.
7
Serious injury prediction algorithm based on large-scale data and under-triage control.基于大规模数据和低分流控制的严重损伤预测算法
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jan;98:266-276. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.028. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
8
A Review of Intelligent Driving Style Analysis Systems and Related Artificial Intelligence Algorithms.智能驾驶风格分析系统及相关人工智能算法综述
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Dec 4;15(12):30653-82. doi: 10.3390/s151229822.
9
Deep learning.深度学习。
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.
10
Comparison and validation of injury risk classifiers for advanced automated crash notification systems.先进自动碰撞通知系统损伤风险分类器的比较与验证
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S126-33. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.927577.