• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于透明度的车载机器人主动交互设计。

Design of Proactive Interaction for In-Vehicle Robots Based on Transparency.

机构信息

Car Interaction Design Lab, College of Arts and Media, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.

Shenzhen Research Institute, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518057, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 20;22(10):3875. doi: 10.3390/s22103875.

DOI:10.3390/s22103875
PMID:35632284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9146175/
Abstract

Based on the transparency theory, this study investigates the appropriate amount of transparency information expressed by the in-vehicle robot under two channels of voice and visual in a proactive interaction scenario. The experiments are to test and evaluate different transparency levels and combinations of information in different channels of the in-vehicle robot, based on a driving simulator to collect subjective and objective data, which focuses on users' safety, usability, trust, and emotion dimensions under driving conditions. The results show that appropriate transparency expression is able to improve drivers' driving control and subjective evaluation and that drivers need a different amount of transparency information in different types of tasks.

摘要

基于透明度理论,本研究在主动交互场景下,通过语音和视觉两种渠道,研究了车内机器人表达适当透明度信息的数量。实验通过驾驶模拟器收集主观和客观数据,测试和评估了车内机器人不同渠道下不同透明度水平和信息组合,重点关注驾驶员在驾驶条件下的安全、可用性、信任和情感维度。结果表明,适当的透明度表达能够提高驾驶员的驾驶控制和主观评价,并且驾驶员在不同类型的任务中需要不同数量的透明度信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/a8d3805b3f7e/sensors-22-03875-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/bc938a10ca47/sensors-22-03875-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/5e783b3a4e49/sensors-22-03875-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/c681fea7e8be/sensors-22-03875-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/7fffaf64b711/sensors-22-03875-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/43f89f7b6958/sensors-22-03875-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/a5b1f1413b90/sensors-22-03875-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/46b0ddcd0bde/sensors-22-03875-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/85690b774b5e/sensors-22-03875-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/5ca95a3da73d/sensors-22-03875-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/43f9c253570b/sensors-22-03875-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/3487dfbb4014/sensors-22-03875-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/344025fb7da6/sensors-22-03875-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/2798dbeef847/sensors-22-03875-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/22c774bc35a8/sensors-22-03875-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/a8d3805b3f7e/sensors-22-03875-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/bc938a10ca47/sensors-22-03875-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/5e783b3a4e49/sensors-22-03875-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/c681fea7e8be/sensors-22-03875-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/7fffaf64b711/sensors-22-03875-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/43f89f7b6958/sensors-22-03875-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/a5b1f1413b90/sensors-22-03875-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/46b0ddcd0bde/sensors-22-03875-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/85690b774b5e/sensors-22-03875-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/5ca95a3da73d/sensors-22-03875-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/43f9c253570b/sensors-22-03875-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/3487dfbb4014/sensors-22-03875-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/344025fb7da6/sensors-22-03875-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/2798dbeef847/sensors-22-03875-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/22c774bc35a8/sensors-22-03875-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23a0/9146175/a8d3805b3f7e/sensors-22-03875-g015.jpg

相似文献

1
Design of Proactive Interaction for In-Vehicle Robots Based on Transparency.基于透明度的车载机器人主动交互设计。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 20;22(10):3875. doi: 10.3390/s22103875.
2
Multimodal Warnings Design for In-Vehicle Robots under Driving Safety Scenarios.面向驾驶安全场景的车载机器人的多模态预警设计。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 23;23(1):156. doi: 10.3390/s23010156.
3
Robot Transparency and Anthropomorphic Attribute Effects on Human-Robot Interactions.机器人透明度和拟人化属性对人机交互的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;21(17):5722. doi: 10.3390/s21175722.
4
Factors affecting drivers' off-road glance behavior while interacting with in-vehicle voice interfaces.与车载语音界面交互时影响驾驶员越野扫视行为的因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Jan;179:106883. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106883. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
5
Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.适用于雪地路况的自动紧急制动系统可提高驾驶员的感知安全性和信任度。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Apr 3;19(3):332-337. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1407411. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
6
Happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents.幸福感和高可靠性会培养对车载智能体的情感信任。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 14;14:1129294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129294. eCollection 2023.
7
Using voice recognition to measure trust during interactions with automated vehicles.利用语音识别技术衡量与自动驾驶车辆交互过程中的信任度。
Appl Ergon. 2024 Apr;116:104184. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104184. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
8
Reliable and transparent in-vehicle agents lead to higher behavioral trust in conditionally automated driving systems.可靠且透明的车内代理会提高对有条件自动驾驶系统的行为信任度。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 18;14:1121622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1121622. eCollection 2023.
9
The effect of different navigation voices on trust and attention while using in-vehicle navigation systems.不同导航语音对使用车载导航系统时信任和注意力的影响。
J Safety Res. 2014 Jun;49:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
10
Exploring drivers' mental workload and visual demand while using an in-vehicle HMI for eco-safe driving.探究驾驶员在使用车载人机界面进行生态安全驾驶时的心理负荷和视觉需求。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Oct;146:105756. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105756. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Robot Transparency and Anthropomorphic Attribute Effects on Human-Robot Interactions.机器人透明度和拟人化属性对人机交互的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;21(17):5722. doi: 10.3390/s21175722.
2
The impact of multisensory integration and perceptual load in virtual reality settings on performance, workload and presence.虚拟现实环境中多感官整合和知觉负载对表现、工作量及临场感的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 1;11(1):4831. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84196-8.
3
Assessment of Augmented Reality in Manual Wiring Production Process with Use of Mobile AR Glasses.
使用移动增强现实眼镜评估手动布线生产过程中的增强现实技术。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 22;20(17):4755. doi: 10.3390/s20174755.
4
EEG-Based Mental Workload Neurometric to Evaluate the Impact of Different Traffic and Road Conditions in Real Driving Settings.基于脑电图的心理负荷神经测量法评估实际驾驶场景中不同交通和道路状况的影响
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Dec 18;12:509. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00509. eCollection 2018.
5
Intelligent Agent Transparency in Human-Agent Teaming for Multi-UxV Management.多无人机/无人车管理中人类-智能体协作的智能体透明度
Hum Factors. 2016 May;58(3):401-15. doi: 10.1177/0018720815621206. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
6
Human performance consequences of automated decision aids in states of sleep loss.睡眠缺失状态下自动化决策辅助对人类表现的影响。
Hum Factors. 2011 Dec;53(6):717-28. doi: 10.1177/0018720811418222.
7
Multiple resources and mental workload.多种资源与心理负荷。
Hum Factors. 2008 Jun;50(3):449-55. doi: 10.1518/001872008X288394.
8
Augmenting team cognition in human-automation teams performing in complex operational environments.在复杂操作环境中执行任务的人机协作团队中增强团队认知。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007 May;78(5 Suppl):B63-70.
9
Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.对自动化的信任:设计适度的依赖。
Hum Factors. 2004 Spring;46(1):50-80. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.
10
The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.神奇的数字七,加二或减二:我们信息处理能力的某些局限。
Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81-97.