Suppr超能文献

改进疟疾的分子诊断:以唾液为DNA来源的基于液滴数字PCR的方法

Improving the Molecular Diagnosis of Malaria: Droplet Digital PCR-Based Method Using Saliva as a DNA Source.

作者信息

Costa Gabriel Luíz, Alvarenga Denise Anete Madureira, Aguiar Anna Caroline Campos, Louzada Jaime, Pereira Dhélio Batista, de Oliveira Tatiana Flávia, Fonseca Júnior Antônio Augusto, Carvalho Luzia Helena, Ferreira Alves de Brito Cristiana, Nóbrega de Sousa Taís

机构信息

Molecular Biology and Malaria Immunology Research Group, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Department of Bioscience, Federal University of São Paulo, Santos, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2022 May 13;13:882530. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.882530. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Malaria is an acute febrile disease caused by a protozoan of the genus . Light microscopy (LM) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of malaria. Despite this method being rapid and inexpensive, it has a low limit of detection, which hampers the identification of low parasitemia infections. By using multicopy targets and highly sensitive molecular techniques, it is possible to change this scenario. In this study, we evaluated the performance of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to detect DNA obtained from saliva samples (whole saliva and buccal swab) of 157 individuals exposed to malaria transmission from the Brazilian Amazon region. We used the highly sensitive ddPCR method with non-ribosomal multicopy targets for (Pvr47) and (Pfr364). There was good concordance between the quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) results from the saliva and blood, except for mixed-species infections. The sensitivity of qPCR was 93% for blood, 77% for saliva, and 47% for swabs. Parasite DNA was not detected in saliva samples in low-density infections compared with the detection in blood samples. ddPCR showed increased sensitivity for detecting in the blood and swabs (99% in blood, 73% in saliva, and 59% in swabs). Notably, ddPCR detected more mixed infections in the blood (15%), saliva (9%), and swabs (18%) than qPCR. Our data showed that the differences between ddPCR and qPCR were the result of a higher number of infections detected by ddPCR. Overall, there was a moderate correlation between parasite densities estimated by the different methods in the blood. Our findings highlight the possibility of using non-invasive sample collection methods for malaria diagnosis by targeting multicopy sequences combined with highly sensitive molecular methods.

摘要

疟疾是由疟原虫属的原生动物引起的急性发热性疾病。光学显微镜检查(LM)是疟疾诊断的金标准。尽管这种方法快速且成本低廉,但其检测下限较低,这妨碍了低疟原虫血症感染的识别。通过使用多拷贝靶点和高灵敏度分子技术,有可能改变这种情况。在本研究中,我们评估了液滴数字PCR(ddPCR)检测从巴西亚马逊地区157名暴露于疟疾传播的个体的唾液样本(全唾液和口腔拭子)中获得的疟原虫DNA的性能。我们使用了针对疟原虫(Pvr47)和(Pfr364)的非核糖体多拷贝靶点的高灵敏度ddPCR方法。除混合物种感染外,唾液和血液的定量实时PCR(qPCR)结果之间具有良好的一致性。qPCR对血液的灵敏度为93%,对唾液为77%,对拭子为47%。与血液样本检测相比,在低密度感染的唾液样本中未检测到疟原虫DNA。ddPCR显示在血液和拭子中检测疟原虫的灵敏度有所提高(血液中为99%,唾液中为73%,拭子中为59%)。值得注意的是,ddPCR在血液(15%)、唾液(9%)和拭子(18%)中检测到的混合感染比qPCR更多。我们的数据表明,ddPCR和qPCR之间的差异是由于ddPCR检测到的疟原虫感染数量更多。总体而言,不同方法估计的血液中疟原虫密度之间存在中等相关性。我们的研究结果突出了通过靶向多拷贝序列并结合高灵敏度分子方法使用非侵入性样本采集方法进行疟疾诊断的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e9b/9136408/e7344ca56390/fmicb-13-882530-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验